Celkon A 107+ vs Samsung Galaxy Star 2 Plus: A Deep Dive into Budget Android

The Celkon A 107+ and Samsung Galaxy Star 2 Plus represent the extreme end of the smartphone market, catering to users prioritizing affordability above all else. Both devices aim to provide essential smartphone functionality without breaking the bank, but significant differences in their processing power and brand reputation warrant a detailed comparison.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For the average user seeking a basic, reliable smartphone, the Samsung Galaxy Star 2 Plus edges out the Celkon A 107+. While both offer limited performance, the Star 2 Plus’s Cortex-A7 architecture provides a noticeable performance boost for smoother multitasking and app loading, backed by Samsung’s more established software support.

PHONES
Phone Names Celkon A 107+ Samsung Galaxy Star 2 Plus
Network
2G bandsGSM 900 / 1800 - SIM 1 & SIM 2GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 (dual-SIM model only)
EDGEYesYes
GPRSYesYes
TechnologyGSMGSM
Launch
Announced20142014, July. Released 2014, August
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued
Body
Dimensions148 x 77 x 9.6 mm (5.83 x 3.03 x 0.38 in)129.7 x 65.9 x 9.4 mm (5.11 x 2.59 x 0.37 in)
SIMDual SIMSingle SIM (Micro-SIM) or Dual SIM (Micro-SIM, dual stand-by)
Weight-129 g (4.55 oz)
Display
Resolution480 x 800 pixels, 5:3 ratio (~187 ppi density)480 x 800 pixels, 5:3 ratio (~217 ppi density)
Size5.0 inches, 71.2 cm2 (~62.4% screen-to-body ratio)4.3 inches, 52.6 cm2 (~61.6% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeTFTTFT
Platform
CPUDual-core 1.0 GHz1.2 GHz Cortex-A7
OSAndroid 4.2.2 (Jelly Bean)Android 4.4.2 (KitKat)
Memory
Card slotmicroSDHCmicroSDHC (dedicated slot)
Internal4GB 512MB RAM4GB 512MB RAM
Main Camera
Features-LED flash
Single8 MP3.15 MP
VideoYes320p
Selfie camera
Single1.3 MP-
 -No
Sound
3.5mm jack -Yes
35mm jackYesYes
Loudspeaker YesYes
Comms
Bluetooth2.04.0, A2DP
NFCNoNo
PositioningNoNo
RadioFM radioFM radio
USBmicroUSB 2.0microUSB 2.0
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, hotspotWi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct, hotspot
Features
SensorsAccelerometer, proximityAccelerometer
Battery
Music play-Up to 32 h
Stand-byUp to 350 h-
Talk timeUp to 7 hUp to 17 h
TypeLi-Ion 2100 mAh batteryLi-Ion 1800 mAh, removable
Misc
ColorsWhiteBlack, White
Models-SM-G350E, SM-G350
Price-About 90 EUR
SAR-0.75 W/kg (head)     1.12 W/kg (body)
SAR EU0.67 W/kg (head)     0.60 W/kg (body)0.48 W/kg (head)     0.49 W/kg (body)

Celkon A 107+

  • Potentially the lowest price point available.
  • Functional for basic calling and texting.
  • Compact and lightweight design (assumed).

  • Significantly slower processor compared to the competition.
  • Limited software support and updates.
  • Low-quality camera performance.

Samsung Galaxy Star 2 Plus

  • More efficient Cortex-A7 processor for smoother performance.
  • Samsung brand recognition and potential for better software support.
  • Likely slightly better display quality.

  • Still limited performance for demanding tasks.
  • Low-resolution camera.
  • May be slightly more expensive than the Celkon A 107+.

Display Comparison

Neither device’s display specifications are available, but given their market segment, both likely feature low-resolution LCD panels. Expect limited viewing angles and color accuracy. The Samsung Galaxy Star 2 Plus likely benefits from Samsung’s display expertise, potentially offering slightly better color reproduction and brightness, even at a similar resolution. Bezels are expected to be substantial on both devices, maximizing screen real estate within a compact form factor.

Camera Comparison

Camera details are sparse for both devices. It’s safe to assume both feature basic rear cameras, likely with resolutions around 2-5 megapixels. Image quality will be limited, particularly in low-light conditions. The absence of Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) is guaranteed on both. Any front-facing camera will likely be of very low resolution, suitable only for basic video calls. Focusing on megapixel counts would be misleading; image processing capabilities, which are unknown, will be the primary determinant of image quality.

Performance

The core difference lies in the CPU. The Celkon A 107+ utilizes a dual-core 1.0 GHz processor, while the Samsung Galaxy Star 2 Plus boasts a 1.2 GHz Cortex-A7. The Cortex-A7 architecture is significantly more efficient and capable than the older architecture likely found in the Celkon. This translates to faster app launch times, smoother scrolling, and a more responsive user experience on the Star 2 Plus. While neither phone is suited for demanding tasks, the Star 2 Plus will handle basic multitasking more effectively. RAM specifications are unknown for both, but are likely limited to 512MB or 1GB, further restricting performance.

Battery Life

Battery capacity is not specified for either device. However, given their low-power processors and basic displays, both should offer at least a full day of standby time and moderate usage. Charging wattage is also unknown, but likely limited to 5W or less, resulting in relatively slow charging times. The slightly more efficient Cortex-A7 processor in the Samsung Galaxy Star 2 Plus may contribute to marginally better battery life under similar usage conditions.

Buying Guide

Buy the Celkon A 107+ if you absolutely need the lowest possible price point and are comfortable with a potentially less refined software experience. It’s suitable for users who primarily need a device for calls and texts. Buy the Samsung Galaxy Star 2 Plus if you prioritize slightly better performance, a more recognizable brand, and potentially longer software support, even if it means spending a little more.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Will the Samsung Galaxy Star 2 Plus be able to run WhatsApp smoothly?
Yes, the 1.2 GHz Cortex-A7 processor in the Samsung Galaxy Star 2 Plus should be sufficient to run WhatsApp without significant lag, even with multiple chats. However, expect slower loading times compared to more powerful devices.
❓ Is the Celkon A 107+ a good choice for a first smartphone for an elderly person?
The Celkon A 107+ could be suitable for a first smartphone for an elderly person if simplicity and affordability are the primary concerns. However, the slower processor and potentially less intuitive software may present a learning curve. The larger brand recognition of Samsung might be preferable for ease of support.
❓ Can either of these phones play basic Android games?
Both phones can play very basic Android games, such as simple puzzle games or older titles. However, they will struggle with more demanding 3D games, experiencing significant lag and low frame rates. Don't expect a good gaming experience.