The Celkon A 107+ and Micromax Bolt A35 represent the extreme end of the smartphone price spectrum. Both devices target first-time smartphone users or those needing a very basic secondary device. This comparison dissects their minimal specifications to determine which offers the better experience for essential tasks like calling, messaging, and light web browsing.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user seeking a functional, ultra-budget smartphone, the Micromax Bolt A35 edges out the Celkon A 107+. While both feature a 1.0 GHz processor, the Micromax's slightly more streamlined software experience (based on brand history) likely translates to marginally smoother operation for basic functions.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 900 / 1800 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 | GSM 900 / 1800 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 |
| EDGE | Yes | Yes |
| GPRS | Yes | Class 12 |
| Technology | GSM | GSM |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2014 | 2013, February. Released 2013, February |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 148 x 77 x 9.6 mm (5.83 x 3.03 x 0.38 in) | 124 x 64 x 11.6 mm (4.88 x 2.52 x 0.46 in) |
| SIM | Dual SIM | Dual SIM |
| Weight | - | 89 g (3.14 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 480 x 800 pixels, 5:3 ratio (~187 ppi density) | 480 x 800 pixels, 5:3 ratio (~233 ppi density) |
| Size | 5.0 inches, 71.2 cm2 (~62.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 4.0 inches, 45.5 cm2 (~57.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | TFT | TFT |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Dual-core 1.0 GHz | 1.0 GHz |
| OS | Android 4.2.2 (Jelly Bean) | Android 2.3 (Gingerbread) |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDHC | microSDHC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 4GB 512MB RAM | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP | 2 MP |
| Video | Yes | Yes |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 1.3 MP | - |
| | - | No |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 2.0 | 2.1 |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | No | No |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | microUSB 2.0 | Proprietary |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, hotspot | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, hotspot |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity | - |
| Battery |
|---|
| Stand-by | Up to 350 h | Up to 175 h |
| Talk time | Up to 7 h | Up to 4 h 30 min |
| Type | Li-Ion 2100 mAh battery | Li-Ion, removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | White | Black |
| Price | - | About 60 EUR |
| SAR EU | 0.67 W/kg (head) 0.60 W/kg (body) | - |
Celkon A 107+
- Potentially larger screen size (unconfirmed)
- Dual-core processor *may* offer slight multitasking benefit
- Affordable price point
- Likely heavy software skin
- Poor camera quality
- Limited performance due to low CPU speed and RAM
Micromax Bolt A35
- Potentially cleaner software experience
- Affordable price point
- May offer slightly better responsiveness for basic tasks
- Poor camera quality
- Limited performance due to low CPU speed and RAM
- Likely smaller screen size
Display Comparison
Neither Celkon nor Micromax provide display specifications beyond size. Given the price point, both likely utilize TN panels with limited viewing angles and color accuracy. The absence of information regarding resolution suggests both are likely 480x854 or similar, resulting in low pixel density. The Celkon A 107+ *may* have a slightly larger display, but without confirmation, this remains speculative. Users should expect a basic visual experience on both devices.
Camera Comparison
Camera details are sparse for both devices. It's highly probable both feature a low-resolution rear camera (likely 2MP or 3MP) and a front-facing camera for video calls. Image quality will be poor in all lighting conditions. The absence of features like autofocus or flash further limits their photographic capabilities. These cameras are suitable for basic documentation only, and users should not expect high-quality photos.
Performance
Both the Celkon A 107+ and Micromax Bolt A35 are powered by 1.0 GHz CPUs, but the architecture is unspecified. This suggests both utilize older ARM Cortex-A series cores. The Celkon A 107+’s dual-core configuration *could* offer a slight advantage in multitasking compared to a single-core processor, but the limited clock speed and likely small RAM capacity (estimated at 512MB or 1GB) will severely restrict performance. Expect significant lag when running multiple apps or browsing complex websites. The Micromax Bolt A35, benefiting from potential software optimization, may feel slightly more responsive for single-tasking.
Battery Life
Battery capacity is not specified for either device. Given the low-power CPU and basic displays, both should offer at least a full day of standby time and several hours of talk time. However, active usage, even with light tasks, will quickly deplete the battery. Charging times are also unknown, but likely to be several hours using the included charger. The lack of fast charging support is expected.
Buying Guide
Buy the Celkon A 107+ if you prioritize a potentially larger screen size (though unconfirmed) and are comfortable with a potentially heavier software skin. Buy the Micromax Bolt A35 if you prefer a device likely to offer a cleaner Android experience and potentially better responsiveness for core tasks, given Micromax's historical focus on software optimization in this segment.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will these phones run popular apps like WhatsApp and Facebook smoothly?
While WhatsApp and Facebook *will* run on both devices, expect significant lag and slow loading times. These phones are designed for basic communication and light browsing, not demanding applications. Using 'Lite' versions of these apps is highly recommended.
❓ Can I play games on the Celkon A 107+ or Micromax Bolt A35?
Simple, 2D games may be playable at low settings, but do not expect a good gaming experience. The limited CPU power and lack of a dedicated GPU will struggle with even moderately demanding games. Frame rates will be low, and the devices may overheat.
❓ What type of SIM cards do these phones support?
Given the target market, both devices likely support standard Dual SIM functionality, accepting Mini-SIM cards. However, confirm compatibility with your carrier before purchasing.
❓ Do these phones support expandable storage via microSD card?
It's highly probable that both devices support microSD card expansion, given the limited internal storage expected. However, confirm the maximum supported capacity before purchasing, as it's likely limited to 32GB or 64GB.
