Cat S62 vs Samsung Galaxy XCover 5: The Ultimate Rugged Phone Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Cat S62 offers superior processing power and wireless charging, appealing to users needing more performance. The XCover 5 boasts a more modern software experience and potentially better software support. Ultimately, the choice depends on your priorities: raw power vs. streamlined usability.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Cat S62 | Samsung Galaxy XCover 5 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66, 71 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat12 600/150 Mbps | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, June 18 | 2021, March 04 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, June 18 | Available. Released 2021, March 12 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 6), plastic back, aluminum frame | - |
| Dimensions | 157.5 x 76.2 x 12.7 mm (6.20 x 3.00 x 0.5 in) | 147.1 x 71.6 x 9.2 mm (5.79 x 2.82 x 0.36 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 260 g (9.17 oz) | 172 g (6.07 oz) |
| IP68/IP69 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 35 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.8m MIL-STD-810H compliant | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) MIL-STD-810H compliant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2160 pixels, 18:9 ratio (~424 ppi density) | 720 x 1480 pixels, 18.5:9 ratio (~311 ppi density) |
| Size | 5.7 inches, 83.8 cm2 (~69.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 5.3 inches, 71.3 cm2 (~67.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | PLS LCD |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.2 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SDM660 Snapdragon 660 (14 nm) | Exynos 850 (8 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 512 | Mali-G52 |
| OS | Android 10, upgradable to Android 11 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 14, One UI 6.1 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM |
| - | eMMC 5.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 48 MP, (wide), PDAF 2 MP | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/1.8, PDAF |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 8 MP | 5 MP, f/2.2 |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | - |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, charging connector pins |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | Wireless QC4 | 15W wired |
| Type | Li-Ion 4000 mAh | Li-Ion 3000 mAh, removable |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black | Black |
| Models | - | SM-G525F, SM-G525F/DS, SM-G525N |
| Price | About 440 EUR | £ 61.49 / € 74.89 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.70 W/kg (head) 1.27 W/kg (body) |
Cat S62
- Superior Performance (Snapdragon 660)
- Wireless Charging
- Rugged Design
- Larger Battery Capacity (potentially longer life)
- Thermal FLIR Camera (unique feature)
- Older Software
- Less Refined Display
- Basic Camera
- Potentially Bulky Design
Samsung Galaxy XCover 5
- Modern Software Experience (One UI)
- Better Software Support (Samsung)
- More Compact Design
- Improved Camera (likely)
- Water and Dust Resistance (IP68)
- Lower Performance (Exynos 850)
- No Wireless Charging
- 15W Wired Charging Only
- Less Powerful Processor
Display Comparison
Both phones feature durable displays, but the XCover 5 likely has a slightly more modern panel with better color accuracy. The S62's display is functional and ruggedized, but not a visual powerhouse. Expect similar brightness levels, though the XCover 5 might have slightly better outdoor visibility.
Camera Comparison
The XCover 5 likely has a more modern camera system with better image processing. While neither phone is a photography champion, the XCover 5's software and sensor technology should result in slightly better image quality, especially in low light. The S62's camera is functional but basic.
Performance
The Cat S62's Snapdragon 660 chipset provides a noticeable performance advantage over the XCover 5's Exynos 850. Expect smoother multitasking, faster app loading, and better gaming performance on the S62. The XCover 5 is adequate for everyday tasks, but may struggle with demanding applications.
Battery Life
Both phones offer decent battery life, but the Cat S62's larger battery capacity (4000mAh vs XCover 5's 4000mAh) *could* translate to slightly longer usage, though real-world performance depends on usage patterns. The S62's wireless charging is a significant advantage.
Buying Guide
The Cat S62 is ideal for construction workers, outdoor enthusiasts, or anyone needing a truly rugged device with a focus on performance. The Samsung Galaxy XCover 5 is a great choice for businesses requiring a durable phone with good software support and integration, or for users who prioritize ease of use.