Cat S62 vs Cat S53: Which Rugged Phone Reigns Supreme?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Cat S62 offers superior performance thanks to its Snapdragon 660 chipset and faster charging. However, the Cat S53 boasts 5G connectivity and a more modern, efficient 8nm processor. Ultimately, the S62 is better for power users, while the S53 is a solid choice for those needing 5G and improved efficiency.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Cat S62 | Cat S53 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66, 71 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 41, 66, 77, 78 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat12 600/150 Mbps | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, June 18 | 2022, July 19 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, June 18 | Available. Released 2022, July 19 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 6), plastic back, aluminum frame | - |
| Dimensions | 157.5 x 76.2 x 12.7 mm (6.20 x 3.00 x 0.5 in) | 171 x 81 x 16 mm (6.73 x 3.19 x 0.63 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 260 g (9.17 oz) | 320 g (11.29 oz) |
| IP68/IP69 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 35 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.8m MIL-STD-810H compliant | IP68/IP69K dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 35 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.8m MIL-STD-810H compliant Dedicated flashlight | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2160 pixels, 18:9 ratio (~424 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) |
| Size | 5.7 inches, 83.8 cm2 (~69.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~73.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.2 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Kryo 460 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 460) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SDM660 Snapdragon 660 (14 nm) | Qualcomm SM4350 Snapdragon 480 5G (8 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 512 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 10, upgradable to Android 11 | Android 11 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 48 MP, (wide), PDAF 2 MP | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide) 2 MP (macro) |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.0 |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 8 MP | 16 MP, f/2.0 |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | Wireless QC4 | Wireless |
| Type | Li-Ion 4000 mAh | Li-Po 5500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black | Black |
| Price | About 440 EUR | About 530 EUR |
Cat S62
- Superior Performance (Snapdragon 660)
- Faster Charging (QC4)
- Potentially Better Camera
- Larger Display (typically)
- Older Chipset (14nm)
- Potentially Shorter Battery Life
- May be more expensive
Cat S53
- 5G Connectivity
- More Efficient Chipset (8nm)
- Potentially Longer Battery Life
- Generally more affordable
- Lower Performance (Snapdragon 480 5G)
- Slower Charging (Wireless only)
- Smaller Display (typically)
Display Comparison
Both phones feature durable displays, but the S62 typically has a slightly larger screen size (5.7 inches vs. 5.3 inches on the S53). While both are designed for robustness, the S62's display often has better outdoor visibility due to potentially higher brightness levels. Resolution is generally similar, offering a decent viewing experience for both.
Camera Comparison
Camera specs are generally comparable, with both phones offering decent image quality in good lighting conditions. However, the S62 often has a slightly better camera sensor and image processing capabilities, resulting in marginally better photos and videos. Low-light performance is likely similar on both.
Performance
The Cat S62's Snapdragon 660 provides a noticeable performance advantage over the S53's Snapdragon 480 5G. Expect smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and better gaming performance on the S62. The S53's 8nm process offers improved power efficiency, but the raw processing power is lower.
Battery Life
The Cat S53 generally has a slightly larger battery capacity and benefits from the more efficient 8nm Snapdragon 480 5G chipset, potentially leading to longer battery life than the Cat S62. Both phones support wireless charging, but the S62 supports QC4 fast charging, which is faster than the S53's wireless charging.
Buying Guide
The Cat S62 is ideal for professionals in demanding industries like construction, mining, or fieldwork who prioritize performance and fast charging. The Cat S53 is a great option for users who need a rugged phone with 5G connectivity and a longer battery life, without breaking the bank.