Cat S62 vs. Blackview BV9900E: A Deep Dive into Rugged Smartphone Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing a proven, stable experience with wireless charging and quick charging support, the Cat S62 is the better choice. While the Blackview BV9900E boasts a more modern 12nm process and potentially higher peak performance, the Cat S62’s optimized software and charging features offer a more refined user experience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Cat S62 | Blackview BV9900E |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66, 71 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat12 600/150 Mbps | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE |
| CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, June 18 | 2020, September 10. Released 2020, September |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, June 18 | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 6), plastic back, aluminum frame | - |
| Dimensions | 157.5 x 76.2 x 12.7 mm (6.20 x 3.00 x 0.5 in) | 156.5 x 78.3 x 14.2 mm (6.16 x 3.08 x 0.56 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 260 g (9.17 oz) | 273 g (9.63 oz) |
| IP68/IP69 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 35 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.8m MIL-STD-810H compliant | - | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2160 pixels, 18:9 ratio (~424 ppi density) | 1080 x 2280 pixels, 19:9 ratio (~432 ppi density) |
| Size | 5.7 inches, 83.8 cm2 (~69.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 5.84 inches, 85.1 cm2 (~69.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.2 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SDM660 Snapdragon 660 (14 nm) | Mediatek MT6779V/CE Helio P90 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 512 | PowerVR GM9446 |
| OS | Android 10, upgradable to Android 11 | Android 10 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 48 MP, (wide), PDAF 2 MP | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF 16 MP, 120˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@60fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 8 MP | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | - |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | Wireless QC4 | 15W wired 18W wireless |
| Type | Li-Ion 4000 mAh | 4380 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black | Black, Silver |
| Price | About 440 EUR | About 260 EUR |
Cat S62
- Proven Snapdragon 660 platform offers stability.
- Wireless charging with QC4 support provides convenience.
- Mature software optimization for a smoother experience.
- Older 14nm process may result in slightly lower efficiency.
- Potentially less raw processing power compared to the Helio P90.
Blackview BV9900E
- More modern 12nm Helio P90 offers potential performance gains.
- Faster 18W wireless charging.
- Potentially better image processing with the Helio P90 ISP.
- MediaTek’s software optimization may not match Qualcomm’s.
- Reliance on wired charging for faster speeds.
Display Comparison
Neither device is known for display excellence, focusing instead on ruggedness. Specific display specs are unavailable, but the Cat S62’s Qualcomm chipset likely drives a standard LCD panel. The Blackview BV9900E, while lacking detailed specs, benefits from a more modern manufacturing process, potentially allowing for a slightly more efficient display. However, without knowing panel type, resolution, or brightness, a definitive winner is impossible to declare. Both will likely prioritize visibility in direct sunlight over color accuracy.
Camera Comparison
Detailed camera specs are missing for both devices. However, given the target market, image quality is likely secondary to durability. Both phones will likely feature a primary sensor, potentially accompanied by auxiliary lenses of limited utility (like a 2MP macro). The Helio P90’s image signal processor (ISP) *could* offer slightly better image processing capabilities, but this is heavily dependent on software implementation. Without knowing sensor sizes or apertures, it’s difficult to assess the true camera performance.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Cat S62’s Snapdragon 660 (14nm) is a well-established SoC known for its efficiency and stability. Its octa-core configuration, split between 2.2 GHz Kryo 260 Gold and 1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver cores, provides a balanced experience. The Blackview BV9900E’s Helio P90 (12nm) utilizes a dual-cluster setup with 2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A75 and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. The 12nm process *should* translate to better power efficiency and potentially higher sustained performance under load compared to the 14nm Snapdragon 660. However, MediaTek’s software optimization historically hasn’t matched Qualcomm’s, potentially limiting the P90’s real-world advantage. The Snapdragon 660’s mature drivers and optimization will likely provide a smoother, more consistent experience for everyday tasks.
Battery Life
Battery capacity is not specified for either device. However, the Blackview BV9900E offers both 15W wired and 18W wireless charging, while the Cat S62 supports wireless charging with QC4 quick charging. The faster wired charging of the Blackview, combined with the potentially more efficient Helio P90, could lead to quicker top-ups. However, the Cat S62’s QC4 support ensures compatibility with a wider range of fast chargers and potentially faster overall charging speeds with compatible adapters. The presence of wireless charging on the Cat S62 is a significant convenience factor.
Buying Guide
Buy the Cat S62 if you need a reliable, well-supported rugged phone with convenient wireless charging and a mature software experience. It’s ideal for professionals in field work or anyone who values long-term stability. Buy the Blackview BV9900E if you prioritize raw processing power for tasks like video editing or demanding mobile games, and are comfortable with a potentially less polished software experience and relying solely on wired charging.