Cat S53 vs Ulefone Armor 10 5G: The Ultimate Rugged 5G Battle
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Ulefone Armor 10 5G generally edges out the Cat S53 thanks to its more powerful Dimensity 800 chipset and slightly better overall specs. However, the Cat S53's wireless charging and potentially more robust build quality might appeal to specific users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Cat S53 | Ulefone Armor 10 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 41, 66, 77, 78 | 1, 3, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| - | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, July 19 | 2020, November 17. Released 2020, December 07 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, July 19 | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Front glass, aluminum back with rubber, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 171 x 81 x 16 mm (6.73 x 3.19 x 0.63 in) | 176.5 x 82.8 x 14.6 mm (6.95 x 3.26 x 0.57 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 320 g (11.29 oz) | 328 g (11.57 oz) |
| IP68/IP69K dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 35 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.8m MIL-STD-810H compliant Dedicated flashlight | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.2m MIL-STD-810G compliant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Scratch-resistant glass, oleophobic coating |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~73.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~73.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Kryo 460 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 460) | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A76 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM4350 Snapdragon 480 5G (8 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 800 (7 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Mali-G57 MP4 |
| OS | Android 11 | Android 10, planned upgrade to Android 11 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide) 2 MP (macro) | - |
| Features | LED flash | LED flash, Panorama, HDR |
| Quad | - | 64 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide) 5 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0 | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0 | 16 MP, f/2.2 |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | FM radio, RDS, recording |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, baroceptor, coulombmeter |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | Wireless | 15W wired 15W wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 5500 mAh | Li-Po 5800 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black | Black |
| Price | About 530 EUR | About 420 EUR |
Cat S53
- Wireless Charging
- Potentially more compact design
- Rugged build quality (Cat brand reputation)
- Less powerful chipset
- Limited camera specs
- Potentially shorter battery life
Ulefone Armor 10 5G
- More powerful Dimensity 800 chipset
- Larger battery capacity
- Wired and Wireless Charging
- Potentially better camera performance
- Bulkier design
- Ulefone brand reputation (less established than Cat)
Display Comparison
Both phones likely feature durable displays, though specifics on screen technology (LCD vs AMOLED) and resolution are not readily available. Expect similar viewing experiences, prioritizing durability over premium display quality. The Armor 10 5G may have a slightly larger screen size.
Camera Comparison
Camera specs are limited for both devices. Expect decent image quality in good lighting conditions, but don't anticipate flagship-level photography. The Armor 10 5G might have a slight edge due to potentially better image processing capabilities of the Dimensity 800.
Performance
The Ulefone Armor 10 5G's MediaTek Dimensity 800 chipset (7nm) offers a significant performance advantage over the Cat S53's Snapdragon 480 5G (8nm). Expect smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and better gaming performance on the Armor 10 5G. The Cortex-A76 cores in the Dimensity 800 are particularly beneficial for demanding tasks.
Battery Life
The Ulefone Armor 10 5G likely has a larger battery capacity, providing longer battery life than the Cat S53. While both offer wireless charging, the Armor 10 5G also supports 15W wired charging, offering faster charging options.
Buying Guide
The Cat S53 is ideal for users prioritizing wireless charging and a potentially more compact design within the rugged phone category. The Ulefone Armor 10 5G is a better choice for those needing raw processing power, a larger battery, and a more feature-rich experience, even if it means a slightly bulkier device.