Cat S53 vs Doogee S98 Pro: A Deep Dive into Rugged Smartphone Performance

The rugged smartphone market caters to a specific user – those needing durability and reliability in challenging environments. Both the Cat S53 and Doogee S98 Pro aim to deliver this, but they take different approaches to performance and features. The Cat S53 leverages a Qualcomm 5G chipset, while the Doogee S98 Pro opts for a MediaTek Helio G96, creating a key distinction in processing power and efficiency.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For the average user prioritizing consistent performance and 5G connectivity, the Cat S53 emerges as the better choice. Its Snapdragon 480 offers a more modern architecture and better long-term software support, despite the Doogee S98 Pro’s faster wired charging.

PHONES
Phone Names Cat S53 Doogee S98 Pro
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsHSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100
4G bands1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 661, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66
5G bands1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 41, 66, 77, 78-
SpeedHSPA, LTEHSPA, LTE
TechnologyGSM / HSPA / LTE / 5GGSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE
Launch
Announced2022, July 192022, May 27
StatusAvailable. Released 2022, July 19Available. Released 2022, June 06
Body
Dimensions171 x 81 x 16 mm (6.73 x 3.19 x 0.63 in)172 x 82 x 15.5 mm (6.77 x 3.23 x 0.61 in)
SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight320 g (11.29 oz)320 g (11.29 oz)
 IP68/IP69K dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 35 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.8m MIL-STD-810H compliant Dedicated flashlight-
Display
Protection-Corning Gorilla Glass
Resolution720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density)1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~409 ppi density)
Size6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~73.6% screen-to-body ratio)6.3 inches, 97.4 cm2 (~69.1% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeIPS LCDIPS LCD, 500 nits (peak)
Platform
CPUOcta-core (2x2.0 GHz Kryo 460 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 460)Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
ChipsetQualcomm SM4350 Snapdragon 480 5G (8 nm)Mediatek MT6781 Helio G96 (12 nm)
GPUAdreno 619Mali-G57 MC2
OSAndroid 11Android 12
Memory
Card slotmicroSDXC (uses shared SIM slot)microSDXC (dedicated slot)
Internal128GB 6GB RAM256GB 8GB RAM
Main Camera
Dual48 MP, f/1.8, (wide) 2 MP (macro)-
FeaturesLED flashDual-LED flash, HDR, panorama
Single16 MP, f/2.0-
Triple-48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF 20 MP, f/1.8, (night vision), 2 infrared night vision lights Thermal imaging camera
Video1080p@30fps1440p, 1080p
Selfie camera
Single16 MP, f/2.016 MP, f/2.0, (wide)
Video1080p@30fps1080p
Sound
3.5mm jack Yes-
35mm jackYesUnspecified
Loudspeaker YesYes
Comms
Bluetooth5.1, A2DP, LE5.1, A2DP, LE
NFCYesYes
PositioningGPSGPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO
RadioNoFM radio
USBUSB Type-C 3.0, OTGUSB Type-C 2.0, OTG
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-bandWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band
Features
SensorsFingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometerFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Battery
ChargingWireless33W wired 15W wireless
TypeLi-Po 5500 mAh6000 mAh
Misc
ColorsBlackBlack
PriceAbout 530 EURAbout 470 EUR

Cat S53

  • Modern 5G chipset (Snapdragon 480)
  • More efficient 8nm process
  • Potentially longer battery life due to chipset efficiency

  • Wireless charging only
  • Potentially lower peak performance compared to Helio G96 in short bursts

Doogee S98 Pro

  • Faster 33W wired charging
  • 15W wireless charging
  • Higher clocked CPU cores (slightly)

  • Less efficient 12nm process
  • Older chipset architecture (Helio G96)
  • Potentially shorter battery life

Display Comparison

Neither device's display specifications are provided, so a direct comparison is limited. However, given the market segment, both likely utilize IPS LCD panels optimized for outdoor visibility. The absence of details like refresh rate or resolution suggests a focus on durability and battery life over premium display features. Expect both to prioritize brightness and viewing angles over color accuracy.

Camera Comparison

Without specific camera sensor details, a detailed comparison is challenging. However, the market positioning suggests both phones will prioritize practicality over photographic excellence. The absence of high-resolution sensor details implies a focus on durability and cost-effectiveness. Expect both to offer acceptable image quality in good lighting conditions, but struggle in low-light scenarios. The Doogee S98 Pro's potential for faster image processing due to the Helio G96 might offer a slight edge in post-processing speed, but the Snapdragon 480's ISP is generally more refined.

Performance

The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Cat S53’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G (8nm) utilizes Kryo 460 cores, offering a more efficient architecture than the Doogee S98 Pro’s MediaTek Helio G96 (12nm). While the Helio G96 boasts slightly higher clock speeds on its Cortex-A76 cores (2.05 GHz vs 2.0 GHz), the Snapdragon 480’s 8nm process and modern architecture provide better thermal management and sustained performance. This translates to smoother multitasking and a more responsive user experience, especially in demanding applications. The Snapdragon 480 also benefits from Qualcomm’s integrated 5G modem, offering broader network compatibility.

Battery Life

The Doogee S98 Pro has a clear advantage in charging speed with its 33W wired charging and 15W wireless charging, compared to the Cat S53’s wireless charging only. While the Cat S53’s battery capacity isn’t specified, the Snapdragon 480’s efficiency should contribute to longer battery life. The Doogee S98 Pro’s faster charging is beneficial for users who need quick power boosts, but the Cat S53’s potentially longer runtime could be preferable for extended outdoor use.

Buying Guide

Buy the Cat S53 if you need a reliable, 5G-connected device for work or outdoor activities where consistent performance and software updates are crucial. It’s ideal for users who value a balance of durability and modern features. Buy the Doogee S98 Pro if you prioritize faster charging speeds and are willing to trade some processing power for quicker top-ups, and if you are less concerned about long-term software support.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Will the Snapdragon 480 in the Cat S53 handle demanding apps like mapping or offline navigation without significant slowdown?
The Snapdragon 480 is designed for efficient performance in everyday tasks and moderate multitasking. While it won't match flagship-level performance, it should handle mapping and offline navigation apps without significant slowdown, especially considering the likely lower screen resolution and refresh rate on this device. The 8nm process also aids in sustained performance.
❓ How much faster is the 33W charging on the Doogee S98 Pro compared to typical wireless charging speeds?
33W wired charging is considerably faster than 15W wireless charging. Expect the Doogee S98 Pro to charge from 0-100% in approximately 1.5-2 hours with the 33W charger, while the Cat S53’s wireless charging will likely take 3-4 hours or longer. This makes the Doogee S98 Pro a better choice for users who frequently need to quickly top up their battery.
❓ Does the Helio G96 in the Doogee S98 Pro get noticeably hot during extended gaming sessions?
The MediaTek Helio G96, built on a 12nm process, is known to generate more heat than newer chipsets. While it can handle gaming, extended sessions with graphically intensive games may lead to noticeable heat buildup and potential thermal throttling, impacting performance over time. The Cat S53's Snapdragon 480, with its 8nm process, is likely to manage heat more effectively.