Cat S53 vs Cat S75: Which Rugged Phone Reigns Supreme?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Cat S75 emerges as the clear winner thanks to its significantly more powerful Dimensity 930 chipset, offering superior performance and smoother multitasking. While the S53 provides solid ruggedness and wireless charging, the S75's enhanced capabilities justify its higher price point for users needing more power.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Cat S53 | Cat S75 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 41, 66, 77, 78 | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 23, 28, 38, 40, 41, 75, 77, 78, 255, 256 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, July 19 | 2023, February 24 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, July 19 | Available. Released 2023, July |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), plastic back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 171 x 81 x 16 mm (6.73 x 3.19 x 0.63 in) | 171 x 80 x 11.9 mm (6.73 x 3.15 x 0.47 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 320 g (11.29 oz) | 268 g (9.45 oz) |
| IP68/IP69K dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 35 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.8m MIL-STD-810H compliant Dedicated flashlight | IP68/IP69 dust/water resistant (up to 5m for 35 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.8m MIL-STD-810H compliant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~73.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 104.9 cm2 (~76.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD, 120Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Kryo 460 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 460) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM4350 Snapdragon 480 5G (8 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 930 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | IMG BXM-8-256 |
| OS | Android 11 | Android 12 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide) 2 MP (macro) | - |
| Features | LED flash | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0 | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0 | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS (L1+L5), GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS |
| Radio | No | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| - | Emergency SOS via satellite (Bullitt Satellite Connect service) | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | Wireless | 15W wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 5500 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black | Black |
| Models | - | BM1S1B |
| Price | About 530 EUR | About 600 EUR |
Cat S53
- More affordable
- Wireless charging
- Rugged design
- 5G connectivity
- Lower performance
- Less powerful chipset
- Potentially less vibrant display
- Limited camera capabilities
Cat S75
- Superior performance
- More powerful chipset (Dimensity 930)
- Likely better display quality
- Improved camera performance
- Wireless charging
- Higher price
- Potentially larger and heavier
- May be overkill for basic users
Display Comparison
Both phones feature durable displays, though the S75 likely has a slightly brighter and more vibrant screen due to its more modern chipset. The S53 likely uses a standard LCD panel, while the S75 may incorporate an AMOLED or OLED display for improved color accuracy and contrast. Resolution is likely similar, around 1080p.
Camera Comparison
While both phones offer decent camera capabilities for their class, the S75's more powerful processor likely translates to better image processing and overall photo quality. Expect improved low-light performance and more detailed images from the S75. Specific megapixel counts are likely similar, around 48MP for the main sensor.
Performance
The S75's Mediatek Dimensity 930 chipset is a substantial upgrade over the S53's Snapdragon 480 5G. Expect significantly faster app loading times, smoother gaming, and better overall responsiveness on the S75. The S53 is adequate for everyday tasks but will struggle with demanding applications.
Battery Life
Both phones offer robust battery life, typical of rugged devices. The S75 likely has a slightly larger battery capacity and more efficient chipset, potentially leading to slightly longer battery life under heavy use. Both support wireless charging, with the S75 offering 15W wireless charging.
Buying Guide
The Cat S53 is ideal for users prioritizing affordability and basic ruggedness, needing a reliable phone for light tasks and occasional outdoor use. The Cat S75 is best suited for professionals and enthusiasts who demand high performance, advanced features, and the ultimate in durability for demanding work environments.