Cat S53 vs Cat S62: Which Rugged Phone Reigns Supreme?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Cat S62 generally edges out the S53 thanks to its more powerful Snapdragon 660 chipset and Quick Charge 4.0. While the S53 boasts 5G connectivity, the S62's overall performance and faster charging make it the better choice for most users needing a truly rugged device.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Cat S53 | Cat S62 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66, 71 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 41, 66, 77, 78 | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat12 600/150 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE |
| - | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, July 19 | 2021, June 18 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, July 19 | Available. Released 2021, June 18 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 6), plastic back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 171 x 81 x 16 mm (6.73 x 3.19 x 0.63 in) | 157.5 x 76.2 x 12.7 mm (6.20 x 3.00 x 0.5 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 320 g (11.29 oz) | 260 g (9.17 oz) |
| IP68/IP69K dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 35 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.8m MIL-STD-810H compliant Dedicated flashlight | IP68/IP69 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 35 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.8m MIL-STD-810H compliant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) | 1080 x 2160 pixels, 18:9 ratio (~424 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~73.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 5.7 inches, 83.8 cm2 (~69.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Kryo 460 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 460) | Octa-core (4x2.2 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM4350 Snapdragon 480 5G (8 nm) | Qualcomm SDM660 Snapdragon 660 (14 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Adreno 512 |
| OS | Android 11 | Android 10, upgradable to Android 11 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide) 2 MP (macro) | 48 MP, (wide), PDAF 2 MP |
| Features | LED flash | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0 | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0 | 8 MP |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | Wireless | Wireless QC4 |
| Type | Li-Po 5500 mAh | Li-Ion 4000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black | Black |
| Price | About 530 EUR | About 440 EUR |
Cat S53
- 5G Connectivity
- Compact Design
- Wireless Charging
- Rugged Build Quality
- Lower Performance
- Slower Charging
- Less Bright Display
- Limited Camera Capabilities
Cat S62
- Stronger Performance (Snapdragon 660)
- Quick Charge 4.0
- Larger Display (Typically)
- Rugged Build Quality
- No 5G
- Larger Size
- Similar Camera Performance to S53
- Can be more expensive
Display Comparison
Both phones feature durable displays, though the S62 typically has a slightly larger screen. The S62's display often offers better color accuracy and brightness, contributing to a more enjoyable viewing experience. Both are designed to withstand drops and scratches.
Camera Comparison
Camera quality is generally comparable between the two, with both offering decent image capture in good lighting conditions. Low-light performance is a weakness for both, typical of rugged phones prioritizing durability over camera excellence. The S62 might have slightly better image processing.
Performance
The Snapdragon 660 in the Cat S62 provides a noticeable performance advantage over the Snapdragon 480 5G in the S53. Expect smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and better gaming performance on the S62. The S53's 5G capability is its main performance differentiator.
Battery Life
Both phones offer solid battery life, easily lasting a full day with moderate use. The Cat S62's Quick Charge 4.0 support allows for significantly faster charging compared to the S53's wireless charging, which is slower.
Buying Guide
The Cat S53 is ideal for users prioritizing 5G connectivity and a slightly more compact design, while still needing a rugged phone. The Cat S62 is better suited for those who demand stronger performance, faster charging, and a more robust overall experience, even without 5G.