The BLU View Mega and Samsung Galaxy A02s represent the extreme end of the smartphone price spectrum. Both aim to deliver essential functionality at a minimal cost, but they take different approaches. This comparison dissects their core components to determine which device offers the best value for users prioritizing affordability.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Samsung Galaxy A02s is the better choice. While the BLU View Mega is cheaper, the A02s’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 chipset provides a noticeable performance advantage, and its 15W charging is a significant benefit over the View Mega’s lack of charging information.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 2, 4, 5, 12, 13, 25, 26, 41, 66, 71 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat6 300/50 Mbps | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, April. Released 2020, April | 2020, November 24. Released 2021, January 04 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 167.5 x 78 x 9.4 mm (6.59 x 3.07 x 0.37 in) | 164.2 x 75.9 x 9.1 mm (6.46 x 2.99 x 0.36 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 189 g (6.67 oz) | 196 g (6.91 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Scratch-resistant glass |
| Resolution | 720 x 1440 pixels, 18:9 ratio (~268 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.0 inches, 92.9 cm2 (~71.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~81.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | PLS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Quad-core 2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 | Octa-core 1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6761 Helio A22 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SDM450 Snapdragon 450 (14 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE6300 | Adreno 506 |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie) | Android 10, upgradable to Android 12, One UI 4.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 32GB 2GB RAM | 16GB 1GB RAM, 32GB 2GB RAM, 32GB 3GB RAM, 32GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash | LED flash |
| Single | 13 MP | 3.15 MP |
| Triple | - | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), AF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP | 5 MP, f/2.2 |
| Video | 720p@30fps | - |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.1, A2DP, LE | 4.2, A2DP |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | Unspecified |
| USB | microUSB 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity | Accelerometer, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 0 | 15W wired |
| Stand-by | - | Up to 530 h (2G) / Up to 530 h (3G) |
| Talk time | - | Up to 6 h 12 min (2G) / Up to 6 h 18 min (3G) |
| Type | Li-Po 3000 mAh, removable | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black | Black, White, Red, Blue |
| Models | - | SM-A025F, SM-A025F/DS, SM-A025G, SM-A025G/DS, SM-A025M, SM-A025M/DS, SM-A025U, SM-A025V, SM-A025A, SM-A025U1, SM-A025AZ, SM-S124DL |
| Price | - | About 110 EUR |
| SAR | - | 1.15 W/kg (head) 0.79 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.40 W/kg (head) 1.37 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Audio quality | - |
Noise -81.4dB / Crosstalk -80.5dB |
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 114h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1765:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-29.8 LUFS (Average)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 90811 (v8)
GeekBench: 495 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 6.1fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
BLU View Mega
- Potentially lower price point
- Basic smartphone functionality
- May suit users with extremely limited needs
- Significantly weaker processor
- Lack of charging information suggests slow charging
- Likely inferior display quality
- Limited software support
Samsung Galaxy A02s
- More powerful Snapdragon 450 processor
- 15W fast charging
- Brighter and higher contrast display
- Samsung’s software and support ecosystem
- Slightly higher price
- Still an entry-level device with limitations
- Camera performance likely limited by sensor quality
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A02s boasts a measured peak brightness of 406 nits and a 1765:1 contrast ratio, offering a visibly more vibrant and readable experience, especially outdoors. While the contrast ratio is nominally the same as the A02s, the lack of display specifications for the BLU View Mega suggests a lower quality panel. The A02s’s brightness is a key advantage for users who frequently use their phones in sunlight.
Camera Comparison
Both devices feature 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are absent for both. However, given the price point, expectations should be tempered. The A02s likely benefits from Samsung’s image processing algorithms, potentially delivering more usable photos in various lighting conditions. The lack of information on the BLU View Mega’s camera makes a direct comparison impossible, but it’s reasonable to assume the A02s offers a more refined camera experience.
Performance
The Samsung Galaxy A02s’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, an octa-core processor built on a 14nm process, significantly outperforms the BLU View Mega’s MediaTek Helio A22. The A22 is a quad-core processor fabricated on a 12nm node. While both utilize Cortex-A53 cores, the higher core count and more mature manufacturing process of the Snapdragon 450 translate to smoother multitasking and faster app loading times. This difference is crucial for users who engage in anything beyond basic phone functions.
Battery Life
Both phones share an endurance rating of 114 hours, suggesting comparable battery life under similar usage patterns. However, the Samsung Galaxy A02s has a crucial advantage: 15W wired charging. The BLU View Mega lacks any charging information, implying a slower, potentially non-standard charging solution. This means the A02s can be topped up much faster, reducing downtime and increasing convenience.
Buying Guide
Buy the BLU View Mega if your absolute priority is the lowest possible price and you primarily need a device for basic communication – calls and texts. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A02s if you want a more responsive user experience, faster charging, and a slightly better display, even if it means spending a little more. The A02s is the better all-rounder for everyday tasks.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Snapdragon 450 in the Galaxy A02s capable of handling basic gaming?
Yes, the Snapdragon 450 can handle less demanding mobile games at lower settings. While it won't deliver a high-end gaming experience, it's significantly more capable than the Helio A22 in the BLU View Mega, allowing for smoother gameplay in titles like PUBG Mobile or Free Fire at reduced graphics settings.
❓ How does the lack of charging information for the BLU View Mega impact usability?
The absence of charging specifications for the BLU View Mega is concerning. It likely means the phone uses a slower, potentially older charging standard, resulting in significantly longer charging times. This can be a major inconvenience for users who rely on their phones throughout the day.
❓ Will the Samsung Galaxy A02s receive software updates?
Samsung typically provides a limited number of software updates for its entry-level devices. While it may not receive the same level of long-term support as flagship models, the A02s is more likely to receive security patches and minor Android version updates compared to the BLU View Mega, which often has limited software support.