The BLU View 2 and ZTE Blade A52 Lite represent the ultra-budget end of the smartphone spectrum. Both aim to deliver essential smartphone functionality at the lowest possible price point, but they approach this goal with different hardware choices. This comparison dissects their specifications to determine which device offers the best value for users prioritizing affordability.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users needing a reliably performing device for basic tasks, the BLU View 2 edges out the ZTE Blade A52 Lite. Its Mediatek MT6761 Helio A22 chipset, while not powerful, is a known quantity offering predictable performance, a detail the ZTE Blade A52 Lite lacks in disclosed specs.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 2, 4, 5, 12, 13, 25, 26, 41, 66, 71 | LTE |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat6 300/50 Mbps | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, November. Released 2020, November | 2022, August 20 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2022, August |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 153.7 x 71 x 9.5 mm (6.05 x 2.80 x 0.37 in) | 164.8 x 75.9 x 8.6 mm (6.49 x 2.99 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 162 g (5.71 oz) | 188 g (6.63 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1440 pixels, 18:9 ratio (~293 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) |
| Size | 5.5 inches, 78.1 cm2 (~71.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.52 inches, 102.6 cm2 (~82.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core 2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 | Octa-core |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6761 Helio A22 (12 nm) | - |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | - |
| OS | Android 10 | Android 11 (Go edition) |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC |
| Internal | 32GB 2GB RAM | 32GB 2GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash | LED flash |
| Single | 13 MP | 13 MP, AF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP | 5 MP |
| Video | 720p@30fps | 720p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.1, A2DP, LE | Yes |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS |
| Radio | FM radio | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | Yes |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct | Yes |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity | Accelerometer, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Type | Li-Po 3000 mAh, removable | Li-Ion 4000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black | Gray, Green |
| Models | B130DL, B131DL | - |
BLU View 2
- Known chipset (Helio A22) provides predictable performance.
- 12nm process potentially offers better power efficiency.
- Octa-core CPU handles basic tasks adequately.
- Limited RAM likely restricts multitasking.
- Camera performance is expected to be basic.
ZTE Blade A52 Lite
- Potentially newer design or software experience.
- Octa-core CPU (though specifications are unknown).
- May offer a more modern aesthetic.
- Lack of CPU specifications makes performance assessment difficult.
- Uncertain power efficiency due to unknown CPU architecture.
Display Comparison
Neither BLU nor ZTE provide detailed display specifications. Given the price point, both likely utilize LCD panels with 720p+ resolutions. The absence of information regarding peak brightness, color gamut coverage, or refresh rates suggests both displays are geared towards basic visibility rather than media consumption. Bezels are expected to be substantial on both devices, maximizing screen real estate within a compact form factor.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance on both devices is expected to be basic. Neither manufacturer highlights advanced camera features like optical image stabilization (OIS) or large sensor sizes. The ZTE Blade A52 Lite, like many budget phones, likely includes a secondary depth sensor or macro lens, but these typically offer limited real-world benefit. The BLU View 2’s camera performance will be dictated by the image processing capabilities of the Mediatek Helio A22 chipset, which is unlikely to offer sophisticated features.
Performance
The BLU View 2’s Mediatek MT6761 Helio A22, built on a 12nm process, features an octa-core 2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 CPU. This provides a known performance baseline for everyday tasks like browsing and messaging. The ZTE Blade A52 Lite only lists an octa-core CPU without specifying the architecture or clock speed. This ambiguity makes it difficult to assess its performance relative to the Helio A22. The 12nm process of the Helio A22 suggests reasonable power efficiency, potentially translating to longer battery life compared to a less efficient, unknown CPU in the ZTE device. The lack of RAM specifications for both devices suggests they likely feature 2GB or 3GB, limiting multitasking capabilities.
Battery Life
Battery capacity is not specified for either device. However, given their budget positioning, both likely feature batteries in the 3000-4000 mAh range. Charging wattage is also unknown. Real-world battery life will depend heavily on usage patterns, but the more efficient 12nm process of the Helio A22 in the BLU View 2 could provide a slight advantage in longevity. Without fast charging support, expect 0-100% charge times to be in the 2-3 hour range for both devices.
Buying Guide
Buy the BLU View 2 if you need a smartphone for essential communication – calls, texts, and light social media – and value knowing the specific chipset powering your device. Its Mediatek Helio A22 provides a baseline level of performance. Buy the ZTE Blade A52 Lite if you prioritize a potentially newer design or software experience, accepting that its performance characteristics are less clearly defined due to the lack of detailed CPU specifications.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Mediatek Helio A22 in the BLU View 2 capable of running popular apps like WhatsApp and Facebook?
Yes, the Mediatek Helio A22 is sufficient for running lightweight apps like WhatsApp and Facebook. It's designed for basic smartphone functionality and handles these common applications without significant issues. However, expect some slowdown with multiple apps open simultaneously.
❓ Since the ZTE Blade A52 Lite doesn't specify the CPU, is there a risk of significantly lower performance compared to the BLU View 2?
Yes, there is a risk. The lack of CPU specifications for the ZTE Blade A52 Lite makes it difficult to gauge its performance. It could utilize a less powerful or less efficient CPU than the Mediatek Helio A22, resulting in slower app loading times and a less responsive user experience. The BLU View 2 offers more certainty in this regard.
❓ Will either of these phones receive regular software updates?
It's unlikely. Both the BLU View 2 and ZTE Blade A52 Lite operate in the ultra-budget segment, where manufacturers typically provide minimal software support. Expect limited or no major Android version updates, and security patches may be infrequent.
