BLU consistently targets the ultra-budget smartphone market, and the View 2 and G53 represent two distinct approaches. The View 2 relies on a tried-and-true, if aging, MediaTek Helio A22, while the G53 opts for a more modern, though still entry-level, quad-core processor featuring Cortex-A75 architecture. This comparison dissects the implications of these chipset choices for everyday users.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing basic smartphone functionality like calling, texting, and light social media, the BLU G53 emerges as the better choice. Its Cortex-A75 core provides a noticeable performance uplift over the View 2’s Helio A22, resulting in a smoother, more responsive experience, despite both phones likely sharing similar RAM and storage configurations.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 2, 4, 5, 12, 13, 25, 26, 41, 66, 71 | 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 12, 17, 28, 66, 71 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat6 300/50 Mbps | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, November. Released 2020, November | 2023, June |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2023, July |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 153.7 x 71 x 9.5 mm (6.05 x 2.80 x 0.37 in) | 164.8 x 75.8 x 8.9 mm (6.49 x 2.98 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 162 g (5.71 oz) | 200 g (7.05 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1440 pixels, 18:9 ratio (~293 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) |
| Size | 5.5 inches, 78.1 cm2 (~71.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~81.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core 2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 | Quad-core (1x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 3x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6761 Helio A22 (12 nm) | - |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | IMG8322 |
| OS | Android 10 | Android 13 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC |
| Internal | 32GB 2GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 13 MP, f/2.0, (wide)
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 13 MP | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP | 8 MP, f/2.0 |
| Video | 720p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | - |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.1, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n/ac, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer |
| Battery |
|---|
| Type | Li-Po 3000 mAh, removable | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black | Pearl, Black, Green, Violet, White |
| Models | B130DL, B131DL | - |
| Price | - | About 100 EUR |
BLU View 2
- Potentially longer battery life with minimal usage
- Likely the more affordable option
- Simple and functional for basic tasks
- Noticeably slower performance compared to the G53
- Struggles with multitasking and demanding apps
- Outdated processor architecture
BLU G53
- Faster and more responsive performance
- More modern processor architecture (Cortex-A75)
- Smoother multitasking experience
- Potentially shorter battery life under heavy load
- May be slightly more expensive
- Still an entry-level processor
Display Comparison
Neither BLU provides detailed display specifications. However, given their price points, both likely utilize IPS LCD panels with 720p+ resolutions. The key difference lies under the hood. The G53’s processor has the potential to drive a slightly more responsive display experience, but without knowing refresh rates or brightness levels, it’s difficult to quantify. Expect similar color accuracy and viewing angles on both.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications beyond the presence of cameras, a meaningful comparison is difficult. Both phones likely feature basic camera setups geared towards casual photography. The G53’s processor *could* offer slightly faster image processing speeds, but the quality will ultimately depend on the sensor and lens used – information not provided. It’s safe to assume neither phone will excel in low-light conditions.
Performance
The core of the difference lies in the chipsets. The BLU View 2’s MediaTek MT6761 Helio A22 is an octa-core processor built on a 12nm process, utilizing eight Cortex-A53 cores clocked at 2.0 GHz. This is a relatively old architecture, focused on efficiency over raw power. The BLU G53, conversely, features a quad-core CPU with a more modern configuration: one Cortex-A75 core at 2.0 GHz and three Cortex-A55 cores at 1.8 GHz. The Cortex-A75 represents a significant architectural improvement over the A53, offering substantially higher IPC (Instructions Per Clock). While the G53 has fewer cores, the A75’s superior performance per core will translate to faster app loading times and smoother multitasking. The A55 cores handle background tasks efficiently, contributing to overall system responsiveness.
Battery Life
Again, specific battery capacities are missing. However, given the processors, the Helio A22 in the View 2 is likely more power-efficient. However, the G53’s more efficient processor architecture and potentially optimized software could mitigate this difference. Without knowing charging wattage, it’s impossible to compare charging speeds. Real-world battery life will depend heavily on usage patterns, but the View 2 might offer slightly longer runtimes for extremely light use.
Buying Guide
Buy the BLU View 2 if you absolutely need the lowest possible price and your usage is limited to the most basic tasks – think calls, texts, and very light web browsing. It’s a functional device for those on an extremely tight budget. Buy the BLU G53 if you value a more responsive user experience, even for simple tasks, and anticipate occasional multitasking or light gaming. The G53’s processor offers a tangible improvement in overall performance.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the BLU G53 handle popular social media apps like TikTok and Instagram smoothly?
Yes, the BLU G53’s Cortex-A75 core provides a significant performance boost over the View 2, making it much better suited for running social media apps without noticeable lag or stuttering. While it won’t offer a flagship-level experience, it will be considerably more enjoyable than the View 2.
❓ Is the difference in performance between the Helio A22 and the Cortex-A75 noticeable for everyday tasks like making calls and sending texts?
While both phones can handle basic tasks like calls and texts, the G53 will feel more responsive when navigating the user interface and opening apps. The A75 core’s higher IPC means even simple actions will be executed faster, resulting in a smoother overall experience.
❓ Can the BLU G53 run any games, and if so, what kind of performance can I expect?
The BLU G53 can run some less demanding mobile games, but don't expect high frame rates or graphics settings. Games like older titles or simpler puzzle games should be playable, but more graphically intensive games like PUBG or Call of Duty Mobile will likely require significant compromises in settings and may still experience lag.
