The BLU View 2 and C5 Max represent two distinct approaches to the ultra-budget smartphone market. The View 2, with its newer Mediatek Helio A22 chipset, aims to offer a more responsive experience, while the C5 Max relies on a simpler, older Cortex-A7 processor. This comparison will dissect the key differences to help you determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing responsiveness and the ability to run modern apps smoothly, the BLU View 2 is the clear winner. Its Mediatek Helio A22 chipset provides a significant performance uplift over the C5 Max’s older Cortex-A7, making it a more future-proof choice despite potentially similar battery life.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 2, 4, 5, 12, 13, 25, 26, 41, 66, 71 | - |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat6 300/50 Mbps | HSPA 21.1/5.76 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, November. Released 2020, November | 2022, January |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2022, January |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 153.7 x 71 x 9.5 mm (6.05 x 2.80 x 0.37 in) | 159.2 x 76.5 x 9.8 mm (6.27 x 3.01 x 0.39 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 162 g (5.71 oz) | 164 g (5.78 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1440 pixels, 18:9 ratio (~293 ppi density) | 720 x 1440 pixels, 18:9 ratio (~282 ppi density) |
| Size | 5.5 inches, 78.1 cm2 (~71.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 5.7 inches, 83.8 cm2 (~68.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core 2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 | Quad-core 1.3 GHz Cortex-A7 |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6761 Helio A22 (12 nm) | - |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | - |
| OS | Android 10 | Android 11 (Go edition) |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC |
| Internal | 32GB 2GB RAM | 16GB 1GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 5 MP
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash | LED flash |
| Single | 13 MP | 5 MP |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 720p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP | 5 MP |
| Video | 720p@30fps | 720p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.1, A2DP, LE | 4.1, A2DP |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | microUSB 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity | Accelerometer |
| Battery |
|---|
| Type | Li-Po 3000 mAh, removable | Li-Po 2700 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black | Black, Blue, Red, Green, Bronze |
| Models | B130DL, B131DL | - |
| Price | - | About 60 EUR |
BLU View 2
- Significantly faster processor for smoother performance
- More modern architecture for better app compatibility
- Potentially better power efficiency with the 12nm process
- Display specifications are unknown
- Camera quality likely similar to C5 Max without further details
BLU C5 Max
- Simpler user experience for basic tasks
- Potentially longer standby time due to lower power consumption
- Likely more affordable
- Slow processor struggles with multitasking and modern apps
- Outdated Cortex-A7 architecture
- May exhibit noticeable lag even with basic tasks
Display Comparison
Unfortunately, detailed display specifications are unavailable for either device. However, given their price points, it’s safe to assume both utilize LCD panels with 720p resolutions. The lack of information prevents a direct comparison of brightness, color accuracy, or viewing angles. The C5 Max, being an older model, may have wider bezels, impacting the screen-to-body ratio.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a direct comparison is limited. It’s likely both phones feature basic camera setups geared towards casual photography. Given the market segment, image quality will likely be similar in good lighting conditions. The View 2’s more powerful processor *could* allow for slightly faster image processing, but this is speculative. The presence of any image stabilization or advanced features is unlikely on either device.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The BLU View 2’s Mediatek MT6761 Helio A22 (12nm) features an octa-core CPU clocked at 2.0 GHz, utilizing Cortex-A53 cores. This contrasts sharply with the BLU C5 Max’s quad-core 1.3 GHz Cortex-A7 processor. The Helio A22’s architecture is significantly more modern, offering improved instruction set efficiency and better multi-core performance. The 12nm manufacturing process also contributes to better power efficiency compared to the Cortex-A7. This translates to faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and a more responsive user interface on the View 2. The C5 Max will struggle with demanding applications and may exhibit noticeable lag even with basic tasks.
Battery Life
Battery capacity data is missing for both devices. However, the Helio A22’s 12nm process *could* offer a slight advantage in power efficiency, potentially offsetting a smaller battery capacity in the View 2. Charging wattage is also unknown, making it difficult to estimate 0-100% charging times. Real-world battery life will heavily depend on usage patterns, but the C5 Max might offer slightly longer standby times due to its less demanding processor.
Buying Guide
Buy the BLU View 2 if you need a phone capable of handling basic multitasking, social media, and light gaming without significant lag. It’s ideal for users who want a more fluid experience with modern applications. Buy the BLU C5 Max if your primary needs are basic communication – calls and texts – and you prioritize simplicity and potentially longer battery life with minimal app usage. It’s best suited for first-time smartphone users or those with extremely limited needs.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the BLU View 2 handle popular social media apps like Facebook and Instagram without lagging?
Yes, the Mediatek Helio A22 processor in the BLU View 2 is significantly more capable of handling social media apps than the Cortex-A7 in the C5 Max. You should experience a smoother and more responsive experience while browsing and using these apps.
❓ Is the BLU C5 Max suitable for someone who primarily uses their phone for making calls and sending texts?
Absolutely. The BLU C5 Max is perfectly adequate for basic communication tasks like calls and texts. Its simpler processor is sufficient for these functions, and it may offer longer standby time due to its lower power consumption.
❓ Can I play games on the BLU View 2?
The BLU View 2 can handle *light* gaming, but don't expect to play demanding titles at high settings. The Helio A22 is an entry-level processor, so it will struggle with graphically intensive games. Simpler games and older titles should be playable.
