The BLU Vivo X5 and Studio X9 HD represent two ends of the entry-level smartphone spectrum. The Studio X9 HD prioritizes basic functionality at an extremely low price point, while the Vivo X5 attempts to offer a more modern experience with a newer processor. This comparison dissects the key differences to help you determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the BLU Vivo X5 is the superior choice. Its octa-core Cortex-A55 CPU provides a significantly smoother and more responsive experience than the quad-core Cortex-A7 in the Studio X9 HD. While both phones are budget-focused, the Vivo X5 offers a tangible performance upgrade justifying the likely price difference.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 |
| 4G bands | - | 2, 4, 5, 12, 17 |
| Speed | HSPA 21.1/5.76 Mbps | HSPA 42.2/11.5 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, March 25. Released 2020, March 25 | 2019, September. Released 2019, September |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 143 x 73 x 10.1 mm (5.63 x 2.87 x 0.40 in) | 153 x 73.4 x 9.1 mm (6.02 x 2.89 x 0.36 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 144 g (5.08 oz) | 160 g (5.64 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1280 pixels, 16:9 ratio (~294 ppi density) | 720 x 1440 pixels, 18:9 ratio (~282 ppi density) |
| Size | 5.0 inches, 68.9 cm2 (~66.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 5.7 inches, 83.8 cm2 (~74.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Quad-core 1.3 GHz Cortex-A7 | Octa-core 1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6580 (28 nm) | - |
| GPU | Mali-400MP2 | IMG8322 |
| OS | Android 8.1 Oreo (Go edition) | Android 9.0 (Pie) |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC |
| Internal | 8GB 1GB RAM | 64GB 3GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash | LED flash |
| Single | 8 MP | 13 MP, AF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | LED flash |
| Single | 5 MP | 8 MP |
| Video | 720p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.0, A2DP | 4.1, A2DP |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | microUSB 2.0 | microUSB 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Stand-by | Up to 500 h (3G) | Up to 550 h (2G) / Up to 500 h (3G) |
| Talk time | Up to 15 h (3G) | Up to 20 h (2G) / Up to 15 h (3G) |
| Type | Li-Ion 2000 mAh battery | Li-Po 2800 mAh, removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, White, Blue | Black |
| Price | About 50 EUR | - |
BLU Studio X9 HD
- Lowest possible price point
- Basic functionality for essential tasks
- Potentially more durable due to simpler design
- Significantly slower performance
- Poor multitasking capabilities
- Outdated chipset architecture
BLU Vivo X5
- Faster and more responsive performance
- Improved multitasking capabilities
- More efficient processor for better battery life
- Likely a higher price point
- May not offer significant camera improvements
- Still a budget device with inherent limitations
Display Comparison
Details regarding display technology (IPS, AMOLED, resolution, brightness) are absent from the provided data. However, given the price points, both devices likely utilize LCD panels with 720p resolution. The Studio X9 HD, being older, may have wider bezels. The Vivo X5's display, while likely similar in resolution, may benefit from slightly improved color calibration due to newer manufacturing processes.
Camera Comparison
Camera specifications are not provided beyond the device names. Given the target market, both phones likely feature basic camera setups. It's reasonable to assume the Vivo X5, being a newer model, may have a slightly better sensor and image processing algorithm, resulting in marginally improved image quality, especially in low-light conditions. However, expecting flagship-level camera performance from either device is unrealistic.
Performance
The core difference lies in the CPUs. The BLU Vivo X5’s octa-core 1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 processor represents a substantial architectural leap over the Studio X9 HD’s quad-core 1.3 GHz Cortex-A7. The Cortex-A55, built on a more efficient architecture, delivers significantly improved performance per clock cycle. The A55’s increased core count also allows for better multitasking. The Studio X9 HD’s MT6580 chipset, fabricated on a 28nm process, will struggle with modern applications and multitasking, leading to noticeable lag. The Vivo X5 will offer a far more responsive experience, particularly when switching between apps or browsing the web.
Battery Life
Battery capacity data is missing. However, the Vivo X5’s more efficient Cortex-A55 processor will likely translate to better battery life, even if both phones have similar battery capacities. The 28nm process of the MT6580 in the Studio X9 HD is less power-efficient, meaning it will drain the battery faster under similar usage conditions. Charging wattage is also unknown, but the Vivo X5 may support faster charging due to newer charging standards.
Buying Guide
Buy the BLU Studio X9 HD if you absolutely need the cheapest possible smartphone for basic calling, texting, and light app usage, and are willing to accept significant performance limitations. Buy the BLU Vivo X5 if you prioritize a more fluid user experience, faster app loading times, and the ability to handle multiple tasks without frustrating lag, even within the budget segment.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the BLU Vivo X5 be able to run popular social media apps like Facebook and Instagram smoothly?
Yes, the BLU Vivo X5’s octa-core Cortex-A55 processor should handle Facebook, Instagram, and similar social media apps without significant lag. The Cortex-A55 is a modern architecture designed for efficient performance in everyday tasks, unlike the older Cortex-A7 in the Studio X9 HD which would likely struggle.
❓ Is the BLU Studio X9 HD suitable for someone who primarily uses their phone for calls and texts?
Yes, the BLU Studio X9 HD is perfectly adequate for basic calling and texting. Its limitations primarily lie in its performance with more demanding applications. If your primary use case is communication, the Studio X9 HD will fulfill those needs at the lowest possible cost.
❓ Can I expect to play mobile games on either of these phones?
While both phones *can* technically run some mobile games, the experience will be limited. The Studio X9 HD will struggle with even less demanding titles. The Vivo X5 will handle simpler games better, but don't expect to play graphically intensive games like PUBG or Genshin Impact at high settings.
