BLU Studio X12 vs. Nokia G100: A Detailed Performance and Value Comparison

The BLU Studio X12 and Nokia G100 represent opposite ends of the entry-level smartphone spectrum. The Studio X12 aims for ultimate affordability, while the G100 attempts to deliver a more refined experience with a modern chipset. This comparison dissects their key differences to determine which phone offers the best value for budget-conscious consumers.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For most users, the Nokia G100 is the superior choice. Its Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 chipset provides a significantly faster and more responsive experience than the BLU Studio X12’s aging Cortex-A7. While the X12 may be cheaper, the G100’s performance boost justifies the price difference for all but the most basic users.

PHONES
Phone Names BLU Studio X12 Nokia G100
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsHSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100HSDPA 850 / 1700(AWS) / 1900
4G bands-2, 4, 5, 7, 12, 13, 17, 44, 66, 71
SpeedHSPA 21.1/5.76 MbpsHSPA, LTE
TechnologyGSM / HSPAGSM / HSPA / LTE
Launch
Announced2021, February 16. Released 2021, February 162022, September 22
StatusDiscontinuedAvailable. Released 2022, October
Body
Build-Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back
Dimensions160 x 77.5 x 9 mm (6.30 x 3.05 x 0.35 in)166.6 x 76.7 x 8.9 mm (6.56 x 3.02 x 0.35 in)
SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIMNano-SIM
Weight189 g (6.67 oz)195.1 g (6.88 oz)
Display
Resolution480 x 960 pixels, 18:9 ratio (~179 ppi density)720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density)
Size6.0 inches, 92.9 cm2 (~74.9% screen-to-body ratio)6.52 inches, 102.6 cm2 (~80.3% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeIPS LCDIPS LCD
Platform
CPUQuad-core 1.3 GHz Cortex-A7Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver)
Chipset-Qualcomm SM6115 Snapdragon 662 (11 nm)
GPU-Adreno 610
OSAndroid 10 (Go edition)Android 12
Memory
Card slotmicroSDXCmicroSDXC
Internal32GB 1GB RAM32GB 3GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM
 eMMC 5.1-
Main Camera
FeaturesLED flashLED flash, HDR, panorama
Single8 MP-
Triple-13 MP, f/1.8, (wide), AF 5 MP, f/2.2, 115˚ (ultrawide), 1/5.0" Auxiliary lens
Video720p@30fps1080p@30fps
Selfie camera
Single8 MP8 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
Video720p@30fps1080p@30fps
Sound
3.5mm jack Yes-
35mm jackYesYes
Loudspeaker YesYes
Comms
Bluetooth4.0, A2DP5.0, A2DP, LE
NFCNoNo
PositioningGPSGPS
RadioFM radioFM radio
USBmicroUSB 2.0USB Type-C 2.0, OTG
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi DirectWi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n/ac, dual-band
Features
SensorsAccelerometerFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, barometer
Battery
Charging-15W wired
TypeLi-Ion 3000 mAhLi-Po 5000 mAh
Misc
ColorsBlack, Blue, Green, RedNordic Blue
PriceAbout 60 EURAbout 60 EUR

BLU Studio X12

  • Lowest possible price point
  • Simple and straightforward user experience
  • Potentially longer standby time due to less demanding hardware

  • Significantly slower performance
  • Outdated processor architecture
  • Likely lower quality display

Nokia G100

  • Much faster and more responsive performance
  • Modern Snapdragon 662 chipset
  • More efficient power consumption

  • Higher price than the BLU Studio X12
  • 15W charging is relatively slow
  • May not be significantly better in camera quality

Display Comparison

Neither device's display specifications are provided, so we must infer. Given the price point of the BLU Studio X12, it likely features a lower-resolution LCD panel with standard color reproduction. The Nokia G100, benefiting from a more modern design, likely has a higher resolution display, potentially with improved color accuracy. The absence of details like refresh rate or peak brightness suggests both are targeting basic visual needs, but the G100 likely offers a sharper and more vibrant image.

Camera Comparison

Without specific camera sensor details, a direct comparison is difficult. However, given the market segment, both phones likely feature basic camera setups. The Nokia G100, being a slightly more premium device, may have a larger main sensor and more sophisticated image processing algorithms. The BLU Studio X12 likely relies on software enhancements to compensate for a less capable sensor. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on either device is largely a marketing gimmick, offering limited practical benefit due to the small sensor size and lack of optical image stabilization (OIS).

Performance

The performance gap is the most significant differentiator. The BLU Studio X12’s Quad-core 1.3 GHz Cortex-A7 CPU is a dated architecture, designed for basic tasks. In contrast, the Nokia G100’s Qualcomm SM6115 Snapdragon 662, with its Octa-core configuration (4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) built on an 11nm process, offers a substantial performance increase. The Snapdragon 662’s architecture allows for more efficient multitasking and smoother operation of demanding applications. The 11nm fabrication process also contributes to better thermal efficiency, reducing the likelihood of throttling during sustained use. This translates to a far more responsive user experience on the Nokia G100.

Battery Life

Battery capacity isn't specified for the BLU Studio X12, but it's likely smaller than the Nokia G100's. The Nokia G100’s 15W wired charging is a modest specification, but it’s still faster than what the BLU Studio X12 likely offers. The Snapdragon 662’s power efficiency further benefits the G100, potentially resulting in longer battery life despite a similar or even smaller battery capacity compared to the X12. A full charge time for the G100 is estimated to be around 2-3 hours.

Buying Guide

Buy the BLU Studio X12 if you absolutely need the lowest possible price and only intend to use the phone for calls, texts, and very light app usage. Buy the Nokia G100 if you want a phone that can handle social media, streaming video, and occasional gaming without frustrating lag, and if you value a more modern chipset and faster performance.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Will the Nokia G100 be able to run popular social media apps like TikTok and Instagram smoothly?
Yes, the Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 in the Nokia G100 is more than capable of handling social media apps like TikTok and Instagram without significant lag. The Cortex-A7 in the BLU Studio X12 may struggle with these apps, leading to a frustrating user experience.
❓ Is the Nokia G100 a good choice for mobile gaming?
While the Nokia G100 isn't a dedicated gaming phone, the Snapdragon 662 can handle less demanding mobile games at medium settings. The BLU Studio X12’s Cortex-A7 is unlikely to provide a playable experience for most modern games.
❓ How much faster is the Nokia G100 in real-world use compared to the BLU Studio X12?
The Nokia G100 will feel significantly faster in everyday tasks like opening apps, browsing the web, and switching between applications. The Snapdragon 662’s octa-core architecture and higher clock speeds provide a substantial performance advantage over the BLU Studio X12’s quad-core Cortex-A7.