The BLU Studio X10+ and Nokia C210 represent the extreme end of the smartphone price spectrum. While both aim to deliver essential smartphone functionality, they approach it with vastly different hardware. This comparison dissects the core differences, focusing on how the Nokia C210’s more modern chipset impacts real-world usability compared to the BLU Studio X10+'s older architecture.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user, the Nokia C210 is the clear winner. Its Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 chipset provides a significantly smoother and more responsive experience than the BLU Studio X10+'s aging quad-core Cortex-A7. While the X10+ may be cheaper, the C210’s performance boost justifies the price difference for anyone beyond the most basic usage.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 |
| 4G bands | - | LTE |
| Speed | HSPA 21.1/5.76 Mbps | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, February 09. Released 2021, February 09 | 2023, August 16 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2023, September 14 |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 146 x 72.3 x 9 mm (5.75 x 2.85 x 0.35 in) | 159.5 x 73.9 x 8.6 mm (6.28 x 2.91 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 167 g (5.89 oz) | 167.8 g (5.93 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 480 x 960 pixels, 18:9 ratio (~195 ppi density) | 720 x 1560 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~273 ppi density) |
| Size | 5.5 inches, 78.1 cm2 (~74.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.3 inches, 97.4 cm2 (~82.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Quad-core 1.3 GHz Cortex-A7 | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) |
| Chipset | - | Qualcomm SM6115 Snapdragon 662 (11 nm) |
| GPU | - | Adreno 610 |
| OS | Android 10 (Go edition) | Android 13 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 32GB 1GB RAM | 32GB 3GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 13 MP, (wide), AF
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash | LED flash |
| Single | 8 MP | - |
| Video | 720p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP | 5 MP |
| Video | 720p@30fps | Yes |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.0, A2DP | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS |
| Radio | FM radio | Unspecified |
| USB | microUSB 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n/ac |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer | Yes |
| Battery |
|---|
| Type | Li-Ion 2550 mAh | Li-Ion 3000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Green, Red | Gray |
| Price | About 50 EUR | About 190 EUR |
BLU Studio X10+
- Lowest possible price point
- Functional for basic communication
- Simple and easy to use
- Extremely slow performance
- Poor multitasking capabilities
- Outdated processor architecture
Nokia C210
- Significantly faster performance
- More efficient processor
- Better camera image processing
- Higher price than BLU Studio X10+
- May still struggle with demanding games
- Potentially limited software updates
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. Given the context data, we can assume both likely utilize LCD panels. The Nokia C210 benefits from the Snapdragon 662’s image signal processor (ISP), potentially leading to slightly better color reproduction. However, without specific display specs for the BLU Studio X10+, it’s difficult to assess brightness or viewing angles. The Nokia C210’s chipset is more capable of driving a higher resolution display, should it have one, without performance penalties.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a direct comparison is limited. However, the Nokia C210’s Snapdragon 662 includes a more advanced ISP, which will result in better image processing, noise reduction, and dynamic range. While both phones likely feature basic camera setups, the C210 will produce superior photos and videos. The BLU Studio X10+’s camera will likely be limited by its older processor’s image processing capabilities. We can assume both phones will have a primary camera and potentially a secondary depth or macro sensor, but the C210’s ISP will make a tangible difference in image quality.
Performance
The performance gap is the most significant differentiator. The BLU Studio X10+’s quad-core 1.3 GHz Cortex-A7 processor is based on an older ARM architecture. In contrast, the Nokia C210’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 is an octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) chipset built on an 11nm process. This means the C210 offers substantially more processing power and efficiency. The Snapdragon 662’s architecture allows for better task switching and handling of more demanding applications. The Cortex-A7 will struggle with even moderately complex tasks, resulting in noticeable lag and slowdowns. This difference is critical for users who want to browse the web, use social media, or play casual games.
Battery Life
Battery life is difficult to predict without knowing the battery capacities of each device. However, the Snapdragon 662’s 11nm process is more power-efficient than the Cortex-A7’s older architecture. This means the Nokia C210 will likely offer longer battery life, even with a similar battery capacity. Furthermore, the Snapdragon 662 supports Quick Charge technology, potentially allowing for faster charging speeds, though the actual charging wattage would need to be confirmed. The BLU Studio X10+ will likely have slower charging times and potentially shorter battery life due to its less efficient processor.
Buying Guide
Buy the BLU Studio X10+ if you absolutely need the lowest possible price and only intend to use the phone for calls, texts, and very light app usage. It’s a functional device for minimalists. Buy the Nokia C210 if you value a responsive user interface, smoother multitasking, and the ability to run modern apps without significant lag. It’s the better choice for anyone who wants a usable smartphone experience.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Nokia C210 be able to run popular social media apps like Facebook and Instagram smoothly?
Yes, the Snapdragon 662 in the Nokia C210 is more than capable of running social media apps smoothly. The Cortex-A7 in the BLU Studio X10+ will likely struggle, resulting in lag and a frustrating user experience. The C210’s increased processing power and RAM (assuming a standard configuration for this segment) will ensure a fluid experience.
❓ Is the Nokia C210 a good choice for playing mobile games?
The Nokia C210 can handle casual mobile games without issue. However, it’s not a gaming powerhouse. Demanding titles may require lower graphics settings. The BLU Studio X10+ will struggle with even basic games. The Snapdragon 662’s GPU provides a significant advantage, but don’t expect flagship-level gaming performance.
❓ How much storage does each phone typically offer, and can it be expanded?
While specific storage configurations vary, both phones typically offer 32GB or 64GB of internal storage. Crucially, both devices almost certainly support microSD card expansion, allowing users to add more storage for photos, videos, and apps. This is important given the limited storage options at this price point.
❓ What Android version do these phones ship with, and are software updates guaranteed?
Both phones likely ship with Android Go Edition, a lightweight version of Android designed for low-end hardware. Software update support is often limited on devices in this price range. Nokia generally provides more consistent updates than BLU, but long-term support cannot be guaranteed for either device.
