The BLU Studio X10+ and Nokia C20 Plus represent the extreme end of the budget smartphone market. Both aim to deliver essential smartphone functionality at the lowest possible price point, but they take drastically different approaches to achieving this. This comparison will dissect their core components to determine which device offers the best value for users prioritizing performance and longevity.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user, the Nokia C20 Plus is the superior choice. While the BLU Studio X10+ may be slightly cheaper, the Nokia’s Unisoc SC9863A octa-core processor provides a substantial performance uplift over the BLU’s quad-core Cortex-A7, resulting in a smoother and more responsive user experience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 34, 38, 29, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA 21.1/5.76 Mbps | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, February 09 | 2021, June 11 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, February 09 | Available. Released 2021, June 16 |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 146 x 72.3 x 9 mm (5.75 x 2.85 x 0.35 in) | 165.4 x 75.9 x 9.4 mm (6.51 x 2.99 x 0.37 in) |
| SIM | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 167 g (5.89 oz) | 204.7 g (7.23 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 480 x 960 pixels, 18:9 ratio (~195 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) |
| Size | 5.5 inches, 78.1 cm2 (~74.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~81.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Quad-core 1.3 GHz Cortex-A7 | Octa-core (4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x1.2 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | - | Unisoc SC9863A (28 nm) |
| GPU | - | IMG8322 |
| OS | Android 10 (Go edition) | Android 11 (Go edition) |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC |
| Internal | 32GB 1GB RAM | 32GB 3GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 8 MP
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash | LED flash |
| Single | 8 MP | 5 MP |
| Video | 720p@30fps | 720p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP | 5 MP |
| Video | 720p@30fps | 720p |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | - | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.0, A2DP | 4.2, A2DP |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | microUSB 2.0 | microUSB 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer | Accelerometer, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | - | 10W wired |
| Type | Li-Ion 2550 mAh | Li-Ion 4950 mAh, removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Green, Red | Ocean Blue, Graphite black |
| Models | - | TA-1388, TA-1380 |
| Price | About 50 EUR | About 90 EUR |
BLU Studio X10+
- Potentially lower price point
- Compact form factor (likely)
- Basic smartphone functionality
- Outdated Cortex-A7 processor
- Likely poor performance
- Unknown charging speed
Nokia C20 Plus
- Octa-core Unisoc SC9863A processor
- More efficient Cortex-A55 architecture
- 10W wired charging
- Still a budget device with limitations
- Display quality likely to be basic
- Camera performance will be limited
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. Specifics regarding panel type, resolution, or brightness are unavailable for the BLU Studio X10+. The Nokia C20 Plus also lacks detailed display specifications. Given their price points, both likely utilize low-cost LCD panels with modest brightness and color accuracy. Bezels are expected to be substantial on both devices, maximizing screen real estate within a compact form factor. The absence of higher refresh rates or advanced features like LTPO is standard for this segment.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is likely to be similar on both devices, and generally poor. Detailed camera specifications are scarce for both. Given the market segment, both likely feature basic sensors with limited image processing capabilities. The absence of Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) is a given. Users should not expect high-quality photos or videos, particularly in low-light conditions. Any megapixel count claims should be viewed with skepticism, as sensor size and image processing are far more important than resolution alone.
Performance
The Nokia C20 Plus holds a significant advantage in processing power. Its Unisoc SC9863A chipset features an octa-core configuration (4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x1.2 GHz Cortex-A55), while the BLU Studio X10+ is equipped with a quad-core 1.3 GHz Cortex-A7. The Cortex-A55 architecture is considerably more efficient and powerful than the older Cortex-A7. This translates to faster app loading times, smoother scrolling, and improved multitasking capabilities on the Nokia. The 28nm process node of the Unisoc chip, while not cutting-edge, is still more efficient than what the BLU likely uses, potentially leading to better battery life under load. The Nokia’s CPU configuration will benefit users who engage in light gaming or use multiple apps simultaneously.
Battery Life
Battery capacity is not specified for either device. However, the Nokia C20 Plus includes 10W wired charging, while the BLU Studio X10+’s charging capabilities are unknown. The more efficient Unisoc SC9863A processor in the Nokia C20 Plus may contribute to longer battery life despite potentially similar battery capacities. The 10W charging, while slow by modern standards, will allow users to replenish the battery overnight. The BLU Studio X10+’s charging speed is a significant unknown, potentially impacting usability.
Buying Guide
Buy the BLU Studio X10+ if you absolutely need the lowest possible upfront cost and your smartphone usage is limited to basic tasks like calls and texts. Buy the Nokia C20 Plus if you prioritize a more fluid user experience, occasional multitasking, and a device that will feel less sluggish over time, even with moderate use. The Nokia’s processor architecture is a generation ahead, offering better long-term usability.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Nokia C20 Plus handle popular social media apps like Facebook and WhatsApp smoothly?
Yes, the Nokia C20 Plus’s octa-core Unisoc SC9863A processor and Cortex-A55 cores are sufficient to run social media apps like Facebook and WhatsApp without significant lag. While it won’t offer a flagship-level experience, it will provide a usable and responsive experience for these common tasks.
❓ Is the performance difference between the BLU Studio X10+ and Nokia C20 Plus noticeable for everyday tasks?
Absolutely. The Nokia C20 Plus’s processor is significantly more powerful. Users will notice faster app loading times, smoother scrolling, and a more responsive interface compared to the BLU Studio X10+. This difference will be particularly apparent when switching between apps or performing multiple tasks simultaneously.
❓ Can the Nokia C20 Plus play basic Android games?
The Nokia C20 Plus can handle basic Android games, but don't expect high frame rates or detailed graphics. Games like Candy Crush or simple puzzle games will run adequately. More demanding titles may experience significant lag or be unplayable.
❓ What type of SIM card does the Nokia C20 Plus support?
The Nokia C20 Plus supports Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by), allowing you to use two SIM cards simultaneously. This is a useful feature for separating work and personal calls or for using a local SIM card when traveling.
