The sub-$150 smartphone market is fiercely competitive. Both the BLU Studio X10+ and Motorola Moto E20 aim to deliver essential smartphone functionality at an accessible price point. However, they take drastically different approaches to achieving this, with the Moto E20 leveraging a more modern chipset architecture while the BLU Studio X10+ relies on a simpler, older design. This comparison will dissect the key differences to help you determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user, the Motorola Moto E20 is the superior choice. Its Unisoc T606 chipset, featuring Cortex-A75 cores, provides a significantly more responsive experience than the BLU Studio X10+'s aging quad-core Cortex-A7 processor. While both phones are entry-level, the Moto E20 offers a noticeable performance boost for everyday tasks.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | - | LTE |
| Speed | HSPA 21.1/5.76 Mbps | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, February 09 | 2021, September 15 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, February 09 | Available. Released 2021, October 04 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 146 x 72.3 x 9 mm (5.75 x 2.85 x 0.35 in) | 164.8 x 75.5 x 8.5 mm (6.49 x 2.97 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 167 g (5.89 oz) | 184 g (6.49 oz) |
| | - | Water-repellent coating |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 480 x 960 pixels, 18:9 ratio (~195 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) |
| Size | 5.5 inches, 78.1 cm2 (~74.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~82.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Quad-core 1.3 GHz Cortex-A7 | Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | - | Unisoc T606 (12 nm) |
| GPU | - | Mali-G57 MP1 |
| OS | Android 10 (Go edition) | Android 11 (Go edition) |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 32GB 1GB RAM | 32GB 2GB RAM, 32GB 3GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 13 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), PDAF
2 MP (macro) |
| Features | LED flash | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP | - |
| Video | 720p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP | 5 MP, f/2.2 |
| Video | 720p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | - | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.0, A2DP | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | microUSB 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | - | 10W wired |
| Type | Li-Ion 2550 mAh | Li-Po 4000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Green, Red | Blue, Gray |
| Models | - | XT2155, XT2155-1, XT2155-3, XT2155-6 |
| Price | About 50 EUR | About 90 EUR |
BLU Studio X10+
- Potentially lower price point
- Simple and straightforward interface
- May be more readily available in certain regions
- Significantly slower processor
- Outdated chipset architecture
- Likely limited software support
- Unknown charging speed
Motorola Moto E20
- More powerful Unisoc T606 chipset
- Octa-core processor with Cortex-A75 cores
- 10W wired charging
- Better multitasking capabilities
- May be slightly more expensive
- 10W charging is relatively slow
- Entry-level camera performance
Display Comparison
Neither BLU nor Motorola provide detailed display specifications for these models. Given their price points, it's safe to assume both utilize LCD panels with 720p+ resolutions. However, the lack of information regarding brightness, color gamut coverage, or refresh rates makes a direct comparison impossible. The BLU Studio X10+ likely has wider bezels, typical of older designs, while the Moto E20 may benefit from slightly more modern design choices. Without concrete data, display quality is a significant unknown.
Camera Comparison
Both devices likely feature basic camera setups. Without detailed sensor information, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment. However, given the market segment, both will likely rely on low-resolution primary sensors. The Moto E20 may have a slight advantage due to potentially better image signal processing (ISP) capabilities integrated within the Unisoc T606 chipset, leading to marginally improved image quality in favorable lighting conditions. Any 2MP macro or depth sensors on either device should be considered largely marketing features with limited real-world utility.
Performance
The Motorola Moto E20’s Unisoc T606 chipset is the clear winner here. Its octa-core configuration, utilizing two Cortex-A75 cores clocked at 1.6 GHz and six Cortex-A55 cores, represents a substantial architectural leap over the BLU Studio X10+'s quad-core 1.3 GHz Cortex-A7 processor. The Cortex-A75 cores offer significantly improved single-core performance, crucial for app launch times and responsiveness. The 12nm manufacturing process of the T606 also contributes to better power efficiency compared to the likely older process node used for the Cortex-A7. This translates to a smoother user experience and better multitasking capabilities on the Moto E20.
Battery Life
Battery capacity is not specified for either device. However, the Moto E20 includes 10W wired charging, while the BLU Studio X10+’s charging capabilities are unknown. The more efficient Unisoc T606 chipset in the Moto E20 will likely contribute to longer battery life, even if the capacity is similar. The 10W charging, while slow by modern standards, provides a predictable charging experience, whereas the BLU Studio X10+’s charging speed remains a question mark.
Buying Guide
Buy the BLU Studio X10+ if your primary need is a very basic smartphone for minimal tasks like calls and texts, and you prioritize absolute lowest cost above all else. Buy the Motorola Moto E20 if you prefer a smoother, more capable experience for social media, light gaming, and general app usage, even if it means spending a little more. The E20 is the better option for anyone who doesn't want to constantly fight with a sluggish interface.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Unisoc T606 in the Moto E20 powerful enough for popular apps like WhatsApp and Facebook?
Yes, the Unisoc T606 is more than capable of running apps like WhatsApp and Facebook smoothly. The Cortex-A75 cores provide sufficient processing power for these everyday applications, offering a noticeably better experience than the BLU Studio X10+'s older processor.
❓ How does the BLU Studio X10+ perform with basic web browsing?
Basic web browsing is possible on the BLU Studio X10+, but expect slower page loading times and potential lag, especially with multiple tabs open. The older Cortex-A7 processor struggles with demanding tasks like rendering complex web pages.
❓ Will the Moto E20 receive software updates?
Motorola typically provides at least one major Android update and security patches for their budget devices. While the Moto E20 won't receive updates for as long as flagship models, it's likely to receive more consistent updates than the BLU Studio X10+, given BLU's track record.
❓ What type of charging port does the Moto E20 use?
The Motorola Moto E20 uses a micro-USB port for charging and data transfer. While not as modern as USB-C, it's a common standard for devices in this price range.
