The sub-$150 smartphone market is fiercely competitive. Both the BLU Studio X10+ and the Infinix Smart 5 Pro aim to deliver essential smartphone functionality at an incredibly accessible price point. However, they take different approaches to achieving this, with the Infinix leveraging a newer, more complex chipset while the BLU opts for a simpler, older design. This comparison will dissect the key differences to help you choose the right device.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing responsiveness and multitasking, the Infinix Smart 5 Pro is the clear winner. Its Unisoc SC9863A octa-core processor provides a significant performance advantage over the BLU Studio X10+'s quad-core Cortex-A7, making everyday tasks smoother and more enjoyable. While the BLU may have a slight edge in simplicity, the Infinix offers better value.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA 21.1/5.76 Mbps | HSPA 21.1/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | - | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 41, 40, 66 |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, February 09 | 2021, November 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, February 09 | Available. Released 2021, November 17 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 146 x 72.3 x 9 mm (5.75 x 2.85 x 0.35 in) | 164.4 x 75.6 x 9.5 mm (6.47 x 2.98 x 0.37 in) |
| SIM | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 167 g (5.89 oz) | - |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 480 x 960 pixels, 18:9 ratio (~195 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) |
| Size | 5.5 inches, 78.1 cm2 (~74.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.52 inches, 102.6 cm2 (~82.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD, 500 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Quad-core 1.3 GHz Cortex-A7 | Octa-core (4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x1.2 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | - | Unisoc SC9863A (28 nm) |
| GPU | - | IMG8322 |
| OS | Android 10 (Go edition) | Android 11 (Go edition), XOS 7.6 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 32GB 1GB RAM | 32GB 2GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 13 MP, f/1.8, AF
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash | Quad-LED flash |
| Single | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| Video | 720p@30fps | 1440p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | Dual-LED flash |
| Single | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| Video | 720p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | - | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.0, A2DP | 4.2, A2DP |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | microUSB 2.0 | microUSB 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | - | 10W wired |
| Type | Li-Ion 2550 mAh | 6000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Green, Red | Morandi Green, Heart of Ocean |
| Price | About 50 EUR | About 70 EUR |
BLU Studio X10+
- Simpler software experience (potentially)
- Potentially lower price point
- Basic functionality for essential tasks
- Significantly slower processor
- Limited multitasking capabilities
- Likely poor performance with demanding apps
Infinix Smart 5 Pro
- Faster octa-core processor
- More efficient Cortex-A55 architecture
- 10W wired charging support
- Potentially better image processing
- Unisoc chipset may have limited software support
- 2MP macro camera is largely ineffective
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. Given the context data, we can assume both likely feature 720p LCD panels, typical for this price bracket. The key difference lies under the hood. The Infinix, benefiting from a more modern chipset, *may* have slightly better image processing capabilities, resulting in marginally improved color accuracy. However, without specific display specs, it's difficult to quantify. Bezels are likely substantial on both, and neither is expected to offer high brightness levels.
Camera Comparison
Both devices likely feature basic camera setups. Without detailed sensor information, it’s safe to assume both will struggle in low-light conditions. The Infinix, again, benefits from the image signal processor (ISP) within the SC9863A, which *could* offer slightly better image processing and noise reduction. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on the Infinix is largely a marketing gimmick; its limited resolution provides minimal practical benefit. Focusing on the main sensor’s quality (which is unknown for both) is more important.
Performance
This is where the Infinix Smart 5 Pro truly shines. The Unisoc SC9863A’s octa-core configuration (4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x1.2 GHz Cortex-A55) represents a substantial leap over the BLU Studio X10+'s quad-core 1.3 GHz Cortex-A7. The Cortex-A55 architecture is significantly more efficient than the older A7, offering better performance per watt. The Infinix’s chipset, fabricated on a 28nm process, allows for more complex tasks and smoother multitasking. The BLU’s older processor will struggle with multiple apps or demanding applications, leading to noticeable lag.
Battery Life
The Infinix Smart 5 Pro includes 10W wired charging, a feature absent from the BLU Studio X10+’s specifications. While 10W isn’t fast charging by modern standards, it’s a welcome addition. Without knowing the battery capacity of either device, it’s difficult to definitively declare a winner. However, the more efficient Unisoc chipset in the Infinix will likely translate to better battery life, even with a similarly sized battery, due to reduced power consumption.
Buying Guide
Buy the BLU Studio X10+ if you need a basic, no-frills smartphone for essential communication – calls, texts, and light app usage. It’s ideal for users who prioritize simplicity and minimal software overhead. Buy the Infinix Smart 5 Pro if you prefer a more responsive experience, enjoy occasional multitasking, or want a device capable of handling slightly more demanding apps. It’s the better choice for users who want a bit more from their budget smartphone.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Unisoc SC9863A chipset known for overheating under load?
The Unisoc SC9863A is a low-power chipset designed for entry-level smartphones. It's unlikely to generate significant heat, even during prolonged use. Its 28nm process is relatively mature, and the chipset isn't designed for demanding tasks that would cause overheating. However, sustained gaming at maximum settings may lead to some thermal throttling.
❓ How does the older Cortex-A7 processor in the BLU Studio X10+ impact app loading times?
The Cortex-A7 processor is significantly slower than the Cortex-A55 cores found in the Infinix Smart 5 Pro. This translates to noticeably longer app loading times, especially for larger applications. Expect delays when switching between apps or launching resource-intensive programs on the BLU Studio X10+.
❓ Will the Infinix Smart 5 Pro be able to run popular social media apps like TikTok and Instagram smoothly?
Yes, the Infinix Smart 5 Pro’s octa-core processor and more efficient architecture should handle popular social media apps like TikTok and Instagram without significant issues. While it won’t offer a flagship-level experience, it will provide a reasonably smooth and responsive user experience for these common tasks.
