The BLU Studio C 8+8 and Samsung Galaxy On5 Pro represent a segment of the market where affordability is paramount. Both devices aim to provide a functional smartphone experience without breaking the bank, but they achieve this with different approaches to hardware. This comparison dissects their core components to determine which offers the best value for budget-conscious consumers.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing a slightly more established brand and potentially better software support, the Samsung Galaxy On5 Pro edges out the BLU Studio C 8+8. While both utilize the same 1.3GHz Cortex-A7 quad-core CPUs, the Exynos 3475 offers a marginally more refined architecture, potentially leading to smoother multitasking.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - S270Q | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 - G550FY |
| 4G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 20, 40 - G550FY |
| Speed | HSPA 21.1/5.76 Mbps | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2016, August. Released 2016, August | 2016, July. Released 2016, July |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 144.4 x 72.5 x 8.5 mm (5.69 x 2.85 x 0.33 in) | 142.3 x 72.1 x 8.5 mm (5.60 x 2.84 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Dual SIM (Micro-SIM, dual stand-by) | Dual SIM (Micro-SIM, dual stand-by) |
| Weight | 152 g (5.36 oz) | 149 g (5.26 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1280 pixels, 16:9 ratio (~294 ppi density) | 720 x 1280 pixels, 16:9 ratio (~294 ppi density) |
| Size | 5.0 inches, 68.9 cm2 (~65.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 5.0 inches, 68.9 cm2 (~67.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | LCD | TFT |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Quad-core 1.3 GHz Cortex-A7 | Quad-core 1.3 GHz Cortex-A7 |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6580 (28 nm) | Exynos 3475 Quad (28 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-400MP2 | Mali-T720 |
| OS | Android 6.0 (Marshmallow) | Android 6.0 (Marshmallow) |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 8GB 1GB RAM | 16GB 2GB RAM |
| | - | eMMC 4.5 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash | LED flash |
| Single | 8 MP, AF | 8 MP, f/2.2, AF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP | 5 MP, f/2.2 |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.0, A2DP | 4.1, A2DP |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS |
| Radio | Stereo FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | microUSB 2.0 | microUSB 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity | Accelerometer, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Stand-by | Up to 775 h (2G) / Up to 650 h (3G) | - |
| Talk time | Up to 32 h (2G) / Up to 24 h (3G) | - |
| Type | Li-Po 3000 mAh, removable | Li-Ion 2600 mAh, removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Blue, Rose Gold, Bronze | White, Black |
| Models | - | SM-G5500, SM-G550F, SM-G550FY |
| Price | - | About 120 EUR |
| SAR | - | 1.40 W/kg (head) 1.09 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.40 W/kg (head) 0.31 W/kg (body) |
BLU Studio C 8+8
- Potentially lower price point
- May offer more storage for the price
- BLU offers a variety of color options
- Less brand recognition
- Potentially slower software updates
- May have limited customer support
Samsung Galaxy On5 Pro
- Established Samsung brand
- Potentially better software support
- Slightly more optimized chipset (Exynos 3475)
- May be slightly more expensive
- Could have less storage for the price
- Samsung's software can be bloated
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. Given the context data lacks display specifics, we can infer both likely utilize similar low-cost LCD panels. The 28nm fabrication process of both chipsets suggests limited GPU power, meaning neither will drive high-resolution or high-refresh-rate displays effectively. Expect basic viewing angles and color reproduction on both.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is likely to be similar and underwhelming on both devices. Without sensor size or aperture information, it's safe to assume both rely on basic, low-resolution sensors. The inclusion of a 2MP macro camera on either device is largely a marketing tactic, as image quality will be significantly limited. Expect acceptable photos in well-lit conditions, but poor performance in low light.
Performance
Both the BLU Studio C 8+8 and Samsung Galaxy On5 Pro are powered by quad-core 1.3 GHz Cortex-A7 CPUs, fabricated on a 28nm process. However, the chipset differs: Mediatek MT6580 in the BLU versus the Exynos 3475 in the Samsung. While clock speeds are identical, the Exynos 3475 generally exhibits slightly better multi-core performance due to architectural refinements within the core design. This translates to potentially smoother app switching and slightly faster loading times, though the difference will be subtle in everyday use. Both will struggle with demanding games.
Battery Life
Battery life will heavily depend on usage patterns. Without mAh specifications, it's difficult to make a definitive statement. However, the power efficiency of the 28nm chipsets is relatively low. Expect a full charge to last a day with moderate use (calls, texts, light browsing). Charging speeds are also likely to be slow, given the budget nature of both devices.
Buying Guide
Buy the BLU Studio C 8+8 if you need the absolute lowest price point and are comfortable with a less-known brand. It's a viable option for basic communication and light app usage. Buy the Samsung Galaxy On5 Pro if you prefer the reliability of a well-known brand like Samsung, potentially better software updates, and a slightly more optimized user experience, even if it comes at a small price premium.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Exynos 3475 in the Samsung Galaxy On5 Pro overheat during prolonged use?
Given the 28nm fabrication process and the relatively low clock speed of 1.3GHz, overheating is unlikely to be a significant issue with the Exynos 3475. It's designed for basic tasks and won't generate substantial heat under normal usage conditions. However, demanding games or prolonged video recording could lead to some thermal throttling.
❓ Is the performance difference between the Mediatek MT6580 and Exynos 3475 noticeable in everyday tasks?
The performance difference is subtle but present. The Exynos 3475 generally offers slightly better multi-core performance due to architectural improvements. This might translate to marginally faster app loading times and smoother multitasking, but the difference won't be dramatic for typical use cases like calling, texting, and browsing.
❓ Can either of these phones run popular games like PUBG Mobile?
While technically possible to *launch* PUBG Mobile on either device, the experience will likely be poor. The limited GPU power of both chipsets, combined with the low RAM configurations typically found in these phones, will result in low frame rates, significant lag, and a generally unplayable experience. Stick to less demanding games.
