The BLU Studio C 8+8 LTE and Samsung Galaxy On5 Pro represent a segment of the market where affordability is paramount. Both devices aim to deliver a smartphone experience without breaking the bank, but they achieve this with different hardware approaches. This comparison dissects their core components to determine which offers the best value for users prioritizing essential smartphone functions.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user seeking a reliable, if not blazing-fast, smartphone experience, the Samsung Galaxy On5 Pro edges out the BLU Studio C 8+8 LTE. The slightly faster 1.3 GHz Cortex-A7 CPU and Exynos 3475 chipset provide a marginally smoother experience for everyday tasks, despite both phones utilizing a 28nm process.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 - G550FY |
| 4G bands | 2, 4, 7, 12, 17 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 20, 40 - G550FY |
| Speed | HSPA 21.1/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2016, August. Released 2016, August | 2016, July. Released 2016, July |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 144.4 x 72.5 x 8.5 mm (5.69 x 2.85 x 0.33 in) | 142.3 x 72.1 x 8.5 mm (5.60 x 2.84 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Dual SIM (Micro-SIM, dual stand-by) | Dual SIM (Micro-SIM, dual stand-by) |
| Weight | 143 g (5.04 oz) | 149 g (5.26 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1280 pixels, 16:9 ratio (~294 ppi density) | 720 x 1280 pixels, 16:9 ratio (~294 ppi density) |
| Size | 5.0 inches, 68.9 cm2 (~65.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 5.0 inches, 68.9 cm2 (~67.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | LCD | TFT |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Quad-core 1.0 GHz Cortex-A53 | Quad-core 1.3 GHz Cortex-A7 |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6735 (28 nm) | Exynos 3475 Quad (28 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-T720 | Mali-T720 |
| OS | Android 6.0 (Marshmallow) | Android 6.0 (Marshmallow) |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 8GB 1GB RAM | 16GB 2GB RAM |
| | - | eMMC 4.5 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash | LED flash |
| Single | 8 MP, AF | 8 MP, f/2.2, AF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP | 5 MP, f/2.2 |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.0, A2DP | 4.1, A2DP |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS |
| Radio | Stereo FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | microUSB 2.0 | microUSB 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity | Accelerometer, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Stand-by | Up to 750 h (2G) / Up to 650 h (3G) | - |
| Talk time | Up to 30 h (2G) / Up to 20 h (3G) | - |
| Type | Li-Po 3000 mAh, removable | Li-Ion 2600 mAh, removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black | White, Black |
| Models | - | SM-G5500, SM-G550F, SM-G550FY |
| Price | - | About 120 EUR |
| SAR | - | 1.40 W/kg (head) 1.09 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.40 W/kg (head) 0.31 W/kg (body) |
BLU Studio C 8+8 LTE
- Potentially lower price point
- LTE connectivity for data access
- Functional smartphone experience
- Slower processor compared to the On5 Pro
- Likely less refined software experience
- Potentially limited software updates
Samsung Galaxy On5 Pro
- Slightly faster processor for smoother performance
- Samsung brand reputation for reliability
- Potentially better software support
- May be slightly more expensive than the BLU Studio C 8+8 LTE
- Still an entry-level device with performance limitations
- Likely similar battery life to the BLU Studio C 8+8 LTE
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. Given the context data, we can assume both likely feature 720p panels, typical for this price bracket. The focus here isn't on resolution, but on responsiveness. The chipset's GPU will dictate UI smoothness, and the Exynos 3475 likely has a slight edge in this regard. Bezels are expected to be substantial on both, reflecting their budget nature. Color accuracy is unlikely to be a priority, and both will likely rely on LCD technology.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, it's difficult to make a definitive judgment. However, given the market segment, both phones likely feature basic camera setups. We can assume a primary sensor around 8MP, and potentially a front-facing camera for selfies. The image processing capabilities of the Exynos 3475 might offer slightly better results in terms of color reproduction and dynamic range, but the difference will be minimal. Any secondary cameras (likely 2MP) are unlikely to provide significant value.
Performance
The core difference lies in the CPU and chipset. The Samsung Galaxy On5 Pro’s Exynos 3475, with its 1.3 GHz Cortex-A7 cores, offers a clock speed advantage over the BLU Studio C 8+8 LTE’s 1.0 GHz Cortex-A53 cores within the Mediatek MT6735. While both are quad-core and built on a 28nm process, the Cortex-A7 architecture is generally more efficient than the A53, translating to slightly better performance per clock cycle. This means the On5 Pro will likely handle multitasking and app loading a bit more smoothly. However, both are entry-level chips and will struggle with demanding games or intensive applications.
Battery Life
Battery capacity is not specified, but both devices likely house batteries in the 2000-2500 mAh range, typical for their class. Charging wattage is also unknown, but likely falls within the 5W-10W range. Real-world battery life will depend heavily on usage patterns, but the slightly more efficient Exynos 3475 in the On5 Pro might translate to a marginally longer runtime on a single charge. Neither phone is expected to offer fast charging capabilities.
Buying Guide
Buy the BLU Studio C 8+8 LTE if you need a functional smartphone with LTE connectivity at the absolute lowest possible price point and are willing to accept compromises in performance. Buy the Samsung Galaxy On5 Pro if you prefer a slightly more refined user experience, even if the performance gains are modest, and value the Samsung brand reputation for software support and reliability.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Mediatek MT6735 in the BLU Studio C 8+8 LTE struggle with popular apps like Facebook or WhatsApp?
While the MT6735 can run these apps, expect occasional lag and slower loading times, especially with multiple apps open simultaneously. It's a capable chip for basic tasks, but it's not designed for demanding applications.
❓ Does the Samsung Galaxy On5 Pro overheat during prolonged use, like when watching videos or using navigation?
The Exynos 3475 is a relatively low-power chip, and overheating is unlikely to be a significant issue during typical use. However, extended periods of intensive tasks could lead to some warmth, but not to the point of discomfort or performance throttling.
❓ Can either of these phones handle basic mobile gaming, like Candy Crush or Angry Birds?
Yes, both phones can handle casual mobile games like Candy Crush or Angry Birds. However, don't expect high frame rates or detailed graphics. More demanding games will likely be unplayable or require significant compromises in settings.
❓ What kind of software updates can I expect from BLU on the Studio C 8+8 LTE?
BLU is not known for extensive software support. Expect limited updates, primarily security patches, and don't anticipate major Android version upgrades. The Samsung Galaxy On5 Pro will likely receive more consistent updates, though still limited for a device in this price range.
