BLU offers a range of affordable smartphones, but the Studio C 5+5 and Vivo XI+ represent distinct approaches. The C 5+5 aims for ultimate affordability, while the Vivo XI+ attempts to inject modern features like wireless charging and a more powerful processor into a budget package. This comparison dissects the core differences to determine which device delivers the best value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the BLU Vivo XI+ is the superior choice. Its Helio P60 chipset provides a significantly faster and more responsive experience than the Studio C 5+5’s Mediatek MT6582. The addition of wireless charging is a compelling convenience feature, justifying the price difference for those seeking a more modern smartphone experience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 - D890U | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | - | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 28, 66 |
| Speed | HSPA 21.1/5.76 Mbps | HSPA 42.2/11.5 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat6 300/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2015, July. Released 2015, July | 2018, August. Released 2018, August |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 143 x 71.8 x 9 mm (5.63 x 2.83 x 0.35 in) | 155 x 75.5 x 7.8 mm (6.10 x 2.97 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Dual SIM (Mini-SIM/ Micro-SIM, dual stand-by) | Nano-SIM + Micro-SIM |
| Weight | 157 g (5.54 oz) | 199 g (7.02 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 480 x 854 pixels, 16:9 ratio (~196 ppi density) | 1080 x 2246 pixels, 18.7:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 5.0 inches, 68.9 cm2 (~67.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.2 inches, 96.9 cm2 (~82.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Quad-core 1.3 GHz Cortex-A7 | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6582 (28 nm) | Mediatek MT6771 Helio P60 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-400MP2 | Mali-G72 MP3 |
| OS | Android 5.0 (Lollipop) | Android 8.1 (Oreo), upgradable to Android 9.0 (Pie) |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC |
| Internal | 8GB 1GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| | - | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 16 MP, f/2.0, 1/3.0", 1.10µm, PDAF
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash | LED flash, HDR |
| Single | 5 MP, AF | - |
| Video | 720p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | LED flash |
| Single | 5 MP | 16 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | - | 720p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.0, A2DP | 4.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS |
| Radio | Stereo FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | microUSB 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct, hotspot | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity | Iris scanner, fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | - | Wireless (Qi) |
| Stand-by | Up to 900 h (2G) / Up to 750 h (3G) | Up to 625 h (3G) |
| Talk time | Up to 24 h (2G) / Up to 12 h (3G) | Up to 21 h (3G) |
| Type | Li-Po 2000 mAh, removable | Li-Po 3050 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Gold, Green, Orange, Pink, White | Black, Silver |
| Models | - | XI |
| Price | - | About 290 EUR |
BLU Studio C 5 + 5
- Extremely affordable price point
- Functional for basic smartphone tasks
- Reliable for calls and texts
- Outdated processor and limited performance
- Likely poor multitasking capabilities
- No wireless charging
BLU Vivo XI+
- Significantly faster processor (Helio P60)
- Wireless charging (Qi)
- Improved multitasking and app performance
- Higher price than the Studio C 5+5
- Battery capacity not specified
- May still lack advanced camera features
Display Comparison
Neither BLU provides detailed display specifications. However, given the price points, both likely utilize IPS LCD panels. The Vivo XI+ benefits from the more modern chipset, potentially allowing for better image processing and color reproduction. The Studio C 5+5, with its older processor, may exhibit slower response times and less vibrant colors. Bezels are likely substantial on both devices, typical for this market segment. Without specific nit brightness data, it’s difficult to assess outdoor visibility, but the newer chipset in the Vivo XI+ *could* support a slightly brighter panel.
Camera Comparison
Detailed camera specs are unavailable. However, it’s safe to assume both phones feature basic camera setups. The Vivo XI+’s more powerful processor likely enables better image processing, resulting in sharper images and improved low-light performance. While both may include multiple rear cameras, the image quality will heavily depend on the sensor size and lens aperture, which are unknown. The presence of a more capable ISP (Image Signal Processor) within the Helio P60 gives the Vivo XI+ a clear advantage in computational photography.
Performance
The performance gap is the most significant differentiator. The BLU Vivo XI+’s Mediatek Helio P60, built on a 12nm process, is a substantial upgrade over the Studio C 5+5’s 28nm Mediatek MT6582. The Helio P60’s octa-core configuration (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A53) provides significantly more processing power and efficiency compared to the Studio C 5+5’s quad-core 1.3 GHz Cortex-A7. This translates to faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and a more responsive user interface. The Vivo XI+ is better suited for running demanding applications and handling multiple tasks simultaneously. The older MT6582 in the Studio C 5+5 will struggle with resource-intensive apps and may exhibit noticeable lag.
Battery Life
Battery capacity is not specified for either device. However, the Helio P60’s 12nm process is more power-efficient than the MT6582’s 28nm process. This means the Vivo XI+ will likely offer longer battery life despite potentially having a similar or even smaller battery capacity. Furthermore, the Vivo XI+ supports wireless charging (Qi standard), providing a convenient alternative to traditional wired charging. The Studio C 5+5 is limited to wired charging, which is slower and less convenient.
Buying Guide
Buy the BLU Studio C 5+5 if you need a functional smartphone for basic tasks like calls, texts, and light social media, and your budget is extremely limited. It’s a viable option for first-time smartphone users or as a reliable backup device. Buy the BLU Vivo XI+ if you prioritize performance for multitasking, streaming, and occasional gaming, and appreciate the convenience of wireless charging. It’s the better choice for users who want a more capable and future-proof device.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the BLU Vivo XI+'s Helio P60 capable of playing modern mobile games?
The Helio P60 is a capable mid-range processor that can handle many modern mobile games at medium settings. While it won't deliver the same performance as flagship chipsets, it provides a significantly better gaming experience than the Studio C 5+5’s MT6582. Expect playable frame rates in titles like PUBG Mobile and Call of Duty Mobile, but you may need to lower graphics settings for optimal performance.
❓ Does the BLU Vivo XI+ support fast wired charging, and how long does it take to charge fully?
While the exact wired charging wattage isn't specified, the Vivo XI+ supports standard wired charging via USB-C. Charging time from 0-100% will likely take around 2-3 hours. The primary benefit is the addition of Qi wireless charging, offering a convenient alternative, though wireless charging is typically slower than wired.
❓ How much RAM does the BLU Vivo XI+ have, and is it sufficient for multitasking?
RAM specifications are not provided. However, given the Helio P60 chipset, it likely includes at least 3GB of RAM, and potentially 4GB. This is sufficient for moderate multitasking, allowing you to switch between several apps without significant slowdown. The Studio C 5+5, with its older processor, will struggle with even basic multitasking.
