BLU offers compelling options in the ultra-budget smartphone space, but choosing between models like the Vivo X5 and Studio C 5 + 5 LTE requires understanding their core differences. The Vivo X5 boasts an octa-core processor, while the Studio C 5 + 5 LTE relies on Qualcomm’s older Snapdragon 210. This comparison dissects these key components to determine which device delivers the best user experience for the price.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the BLU Vivo X5 is the superior choice. Its octa-core Cortex-A55 CPU provides a significantly more responsive experience for multitasking and app loading compared to the quad-core Cortex-A7 in the Studio C 5 + 5 LTE. While both phones target the budget segment, the Vivo X5 offers a noticeable performance uplift.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 |
| 4G bands | 2, 4, 7, 17 | 2, 4, 5, 12, 17 |
| Speed | HSPA 21.1/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps | HSPA 42.2/11.5 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2015, July. Released 2015, August | 2019, September. Released 2019, September |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 143 x 71.8 x 9 mm (5.63 x 2.83 x 0.35 in) | 153 x 73.4 x 9.1 mm (6.02 x 2.89 x 0.36 in) |
| SIM | Dual SIM (Mini-SIM/ Micro-SIM, dual stand-by) | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 157 g (5.54 oz) | 160 g (5.64 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 480 x 854 pixels, 16:9 ratio (~196 ppi density) | 720 x 1440 pixels, 18:9 ratio (~282 ppi density) |
| Size | 5.0 inches, 68.9 cm2 (~67.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 5.7 inches, 83.8 cm2 (~74.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Quad-core 1.1 GHz Cortex-A7 | Octa-core 1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 |
| Chipset | Qualcomm MSM8909 Snapdragon 210 (28 nm) | - |
| GPU | Adreno 304 | IMG8322 |
| OS | Android 5.0 (Lollipop) | Android 9.0 (Pie) |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC |
| Internal | 8GB 1GB RAM | 64GB 3GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash | LED flash |
| Single | 5 MP, AF | 13 MP, AF |
| Video | 720p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | LED flash |
| Single | 5 MP | 8 MP |
| Video | - | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.0, A2DP | 4.1, A2DP |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS |
| Radio | Stereo FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | microUSB 2.0 | microUSB 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct, hotspot | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity, gravity | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Stand-by | Up to 800 h (2G) / Up to 700 h (3G) | Up to 550 h (2G) / Up to 500 h (3G) |
| Talk time | Up to 22 h (2G) / Up to 12 h (3G) | Up to 20 h (2G) / Up to 15 h (3G) |
| Type | Li-Po 2000 mAh, removable | Li-Po 2800 mAh, removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, White, Gold | Black |
BLU Studio C 5 + 5 LTE
- Potentially longer battery life due to the efficient Snapdragon 210.
- Lower price point (likely).
- Simple and reliable for basic tasks.
- Significantly slower performance compared to the Vivo X5.
- Limited multitasking capabilities.
- Outdated processor architecture.
BLU Vivo X5
- Faster and more responsive performance with the octa-core Cortex-A55.
- Smoother multitasking and app loading.
- Better suited for casual gaming and web browsing.
- Potentially shorter battery life.
- May be slightly more expensive.
- Performance still limited by the budget segment.
Display Comparison
Unfortunately, display specifications beyond the model names are unavailable. However, given the price points, both devices likely utilize LCD panels with 720p resolution. The Vivo X5, being a slightly newer model, *may* benefit from improved color calibration or viewing angles, but this is speculative. Bezels are expected to be substantial on both, reflecting their budget nature. Without specific data, it's difficult to assess brightness or color accuracy.
Camera Comparison
Camera specifications are limited. Both phones likely feature basic camera setups geared towards casual photography. Without sensor size or aperture information, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment. However, the Vivo X5’s more powerful processor *could* enable slightly better image processing, resulting in marginally improved image quality. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on either device is unlikely to provide significant benefit due to the small sensor size and limited detail capture.
Performance
The core difference lies in the CPUs. The BLU Vivo X5’s octa-core 1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 processor represents a significant architectural leap over the BLU Studio C 5 + 5 LTE’s quad-core 1.1 GHz Cortex-A7. The Cortex-A55 is built on a more efficient architecture, delivering more instructions per clock cycle. This translates to faster app launch times, smoother multitasking, and a more responsive overall experience. The Snapdragon 210, while power-efficient due to its 28nm process, is simply outmatched in raw processing power. The Vivo X5 will handle more demanding apps and light gaming with greater ease.
Battery Life
Battery capacity data is unavailable for both devices. However, the Snapdragon 210 in the Studio C 5 + 5 LTE is known for its power efficiency. This suggests it *may* offer longer battery life than the Vivo X5, despite the latter’s more powerful processor. The Vivo X5’s faster processor will consume more power under load. Charging wattage is also unknown, making it impossible to compare 0-100% charging times.
Buying Guide
Buy the BLU Studio C 5 + 5 LTE if your primary need is a basic, reliable phone for calls, texts, and light app usage, and battery life is paramount. You're willing to accept slower performance for extended uptime. Buy the BLU Vivo X5 if you prioritize a smoother, more responsive user experience, even if it means slightly reduced battery life. This is the better option for those who occasionally browse the web, use social media, or play casual games.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the BLU Vivo X5 struggle with popular social media apps like Facebook and Instagram?
While the Vivo X5 isn't a powerhouse, its octa-core processor and Cortex-A55 architecture should handle Facebook and Instagram without significant lag. Expect acceptable performance for scrolling through feeds and viewing photos, but intensive features like video editing within the apps may be slow.
❓ Is the Snapdragon 210 in the Studio C 5 + 5 LTE sufficient for basic WhatsApp and calling?
Yes, the Snapdragon 210 is perfectly adequate for basic tasks like WhatsApp messaging and phone calls. It's designed for efficiency, so it will provide reliable performance for these core functions. However, expect delays when opening the app or switching between conversations.
❓ Can either of these phones handle light gaming, like Candy Crush or Subway Surfers?
The BLU Vivo X5 is the better choice for light gaming. The Cortex-A55 processor will provide a smoother experience with games like Candy Crush and Subway Surfers. The Studio C 5 + 5 LTE may struggle with even these simple games, experiencing noticeable lag and frame drops.
