The BLU S91 and Nokia G100 represent two approaches to the ultra-budget smartphone market. The BLU S91 focuses on delivering a functional experience at the lowest possible price, while the Nokia G100 aims for a slightly more refined experience with a Qualcomm chipset and a focus on software support. This comparison dissects their core components to determine which device offers the best value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing consistent performance and a more efficient chipset, the Nokia G100 is the better choice. While the BLU S91 offers a lower entry price, the Snapdragon 662 in the G100 provides a smoother experience, especially with multitasking and moderately demanding apps, despite the slower 15W charging.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 12, 13, 17, 28, 66 | 2, 4, 5, 7, 12, 13, 17, 44, 66, 71 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, June 24 | 2022, September 22 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, June 24 | Available. Released 2022, October |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 164.8 x 76.3 x 8.9 mm (6.49 x 3.00 x 0.35 in) | 166.6 x 76.7 x 8.9 mm (6.56 x 3.02 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 202 g (7.13 oz) | 195.1 g (6.88 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~81.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.52 inches, 102.6 cm2 (~80.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.5 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6762G Helio G25 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM6115 Snapdragon 662 (11 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | Adreno 610 |
| OS | Android 11 | Android 12 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM | 32GB 3GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 13 MP | - |
| Triple | 13 MP, (wide), PDAF
0.3 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 13 MP, f/1.8, (wide), AF
5 MP, f/2.2, 115˚ (ultrawide), 1/5.0"
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 13 MP | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | - |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, barometer |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | - | 15W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Green | Nordic Blue |
| Price | About 170 EUR | About 60 EUR |
BLU S91
- Potentially lower price point
- Functional for basic smartphone tasks
- Likely larger battery capacity (speculation)
- Inferior chipset performance (Helio G25)
- Less efficient processor (12nm node)
- Potentially slower software updates
Nokia G100
- More powerful and efficient chipset (Snapdragon 662)
- Better multitasking and app performance
- Qualcomm’s ISP for potentially improved image processing
- Slower 15W charging
- Potentially higher price
- May have a smaller battery capacity (speculation)
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. Given the context data focuses on processing power, we can infer both likely utilize LCD panels common in this price bracket. The absence of specifications like resolution or refresh rate suggests a focus on cost reduction. Bezels are likely substantial on both, and color accuracy will be standard for budget devices. The user experience will be similar in terms of visual fidelity.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a direct comparison is difficult. However, it’s safe to assume both devices feature basic camera setups geared towards casual photography. The absence of information regarding sensor size or optical image stabilization (OIS) suggests neither phone will excel in low-light conditions. Image processing will likely be more aggressive on the Nokia G100, leveraging Qualcomm’s image signal processor (ISP) for potentially better dynamic range and noise reduction, but this is speculative. The inclusion of a 2MP macro camera on either device is largely a marketing tactic and unlikely to deliver significant image quality improvements.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Nokia G100’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (11nm) is architecturally superior to the BLU S91’s MediaTek Helio G25 (12nm). The Snapdragon 662 utilizes Qualcomm’s Kryo 260 cores – 4x2.0 GHz Gold and 4x1.8 GHz Silver – a design optimized for a balance of performance and efficiency. The Helio G25, with its 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 and 4x1.5 GHz Cortex-A53 cores, relies on older ARM architecture. The 11nm process node of the Snapdragon 662 is more efficient than the 12nm node of the Helio G25, translating to better thermal management and potentially longer sustained performance. This means the G100 will likely handle multitasking and moderately demanding apps more smoothly, while the S91 may exhibit more noticeable slowdowns under load.
Battery Life
Battery capacity isn't specified for either device, but given the target market, both likely feature batteries in the 4000-5000 mAh range. The Nokia G100’s 15W wired charging is a notable drawback. The BLU S91’s charging speed is unknown, but the lack of mention suggests it may be similar or even slower. The Snapdragon 662’s superior efficiency could offset the slower charging, potentially providing comparable or even better real-world battery life despite the G100’s charging limitations.
Buying Guide
Buy the BLU S91 if you need a functional smartphone for basic tasks like calls, texts, and light social media, and your budget is extremely limited. You're accepting compromises in performance and long-term software support. Buy the Nokia G100 if you prefer a more responsive user experience, better multitasking capabilities, and the assurance of Qualcomm's chipset efficiency, even if it means spending a bit more and accepting slower charging speeds.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the BLU S91 struggle with popular apps like Facebook or WhatsApp?
The MediaTek Helio G25 in the BLU S91 is a basic chipset. While it can run apps like Facebook and WhatsApp, you may experience noticeable lag or slowdowns when multitasking or using these apps extensively. The Nokia G100’s Snapdragon 662 will provide a smoother experience.
❓ Is the 15W charging on the Nokia G100 a significant drawback?
15W charging is relatively slow by today’s standards. Expect a full charge to take around 2-3 hours. However, the Snapdragon 662’s power efficiency means you may not need to charge as frequently, mitigating the impact of the slower charging speed.
❓ Can either of these phones handle basic mobile gaming?
Both phones can handle basic 2D games. However, for more demanding 3D titles, the BLU S91’s Helio G25 will likely struggle with frame rates and graphical settings. The Nokia G100’s Snapdragon 662 will offer a more playable experience, but don’t expect high-end gaming performance.
