The BLU M8L 2022 and ZTE Blade A52 Lite represent the fiercely competitive sub-$150 smartphone market. While both aim to deliver essential smartphone functionality at an accessible price, their core processing units differ significantly. This comparison dissects the architectural implications of the BLU’s quad-core 2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 versus the ZTE’s octa-core processor, revealing which device offers a smoother user experience.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing responsiveness in everyday tasks, the ZTE Blade A52 Lite likely holds an edge due to its octa-core configuration. While the BLU M8L 2022’s Cortex-A75 offers strong individual core performance, the ZTE’s greater core count provides superior multitasking capabilities and sustained performance under load.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 12, 17, 28, 66 | LTE |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, February | 2022, August 20 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, February | Available. Released 2022, August |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 209 x 126 x 10.6 mm (8.23 x 4.96 x 0.42 in) | 164.8 x 75.9 x 8.6 mm (6.49 x 2.99 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Micro-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 360 g (12.70 oz) | 188 g (6.63 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 800 x 1280 pixels, 16:10 ratio (~189 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) |
| Size | 8.0 inches, 185.6 cm2 (~70.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.52 inches, 102.6 cm2 (~82.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Quad-core 2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 | Octa-core |
| OS | Android 11 (Go edition) | Android 11 (Go edition) |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC |
| Internal | 32GB 3GB RAM | 32GB 2GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash | LED flash |
| Single | 8 MP | 13 MP, AF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 5 MP | 5 MP |
| Video | 720p@30fps | 720p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.1, A2DP, LE | Yes |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS |
| Radio | FM radio | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | Yes |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct | Yes |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer | Accelerometer, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Type | Li-Po 4000 mAh | Li-Ion 4000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Bronze | Gray, Green |
| Price | About 60 EUR | - |
BLU M8L 2022
- Potentially stronger single-core performance with the Cortex-A75.
- May offer better power efficiency in light usage scenarios.
- Simpler CPU architecture could lead to fewer software conflicts.
- Limited multitasking capabilities due to only four cores.
- Potential for performance throttling under sustained load.
- Lack of information on RAM capacity hinders performance assessment.
ZTE Blade A52 Lite
- Superior multitasking and app switching with an octa-core processor.
- Better sustained performance under load.
- Potentially smoother experience with multiple apps running concurrently.
- Individual core performance may be lower than the BLU M8L 2022.
- Octa-core architecture could lead to higher power consumption.
- Specific core architecture is unknown, impacting performance prediction.
Display Comparison
Display specifications are absent from the provided data, making a direct comparison impossible. However, given the price bracket, both devices likely utilize LCD panels with 720p+ resolution. The absence of information regarding refresh rates or panel technology suggests neither device will excel in visual fidelity or smoothness. Users should expect standard viewing experiences.
Camera Comparison
Camera details are unavailable. In this price segment, expect basic camera systems focused on capturing acceptable images in good lighting conditions. Image processing will likely be minimal, and low-light performance will be limited. Without sensor size or aperture information, it’s impossible to determine which device offers superior image quality.
Performance
The core difference lies in the CPUs. The BLU M8L 2022 features a quad-core 2.0 GHz Cortex-A75. The Cortex-A75 is a performance-focused core, offering significantly more power than the Cortex-A53 commonly found in this price range. However, it’s limited to four cores. The ZTE Blade A52 Lite boasts an octa-core processor, but the specific architecture (e.g., Cortex-A55, A53) is unknown. An octa-core setup generally excels in multitasking and handling background processes, even if individual core performance is lower than the A75. The BLU’s A75 will likely feel snappier for single-threaded tasks, while the ZTE will maintain smoother operation when juggling multiple apps. RAM specifications are also missing, but are crucial for overall performance.
Battery Life
Battery capacity and charging wattage are not specified. Given the budget nature of these phones, expect battery life to be sufficient for a full day of moderate use. Charging speeds will likely be slow, potentially taking several hours to fully charge from 0%. The efficiency of the respective CPUs will play a role in battery endurance, with the ZTE’s octa-core potentially consuming more power under sustained load.
Buying Guide
Buy the BLU M8L 2022 if you primarily need a phone for basic communication – calls, texts, and light social media – and value a potentially more efficient single-core experience. Buy the ZTE Blade A52 Lite if you frequently switch between apps, play casual games, or anticipate needing to run multiple processes simultaneously, benefiting from the advantages of an octa-core processor.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the ZTE Blade A52 Lite struggle with demanding games like PUBG Mobile?
While the ZTE Blade A52 Lite’s octa-core processor is capable of running PUBG Mobile, expect to play at lower graphics settings and potentially experience frame rate drops during intense action. The specific GPU is unknown, further limiting performance expectations. The BLU M8L 2022 may offer slightly better frame rates at lower settings due to its stronger single-core performance, but will likely suffer from similar limitations.
❓ Is the difference between the BLU M8L 2022's Cortex-A75 and the ZTE Blade A52 Lite's octa-core noticeable in everyday use?
The difference will be most apparent when multitasking or running multiple apps simultaneously. The ZTE Blade A52 Lite’s octa-core processor will handle these scenarios more smoothly, preventing lag and slowdowns. For basic tasks like browsing the web or checking email, the difference may be less noticeable, but the Cortex-A75 in the BLU M8L 2022 should still provide a responsive experience.
❓ How important is RAM in these devices, and does the lack of information affect the comparison?
RAM is critically important for performance, especially on budget devices. Without knowing the RAM capacity of either phone, it's difficult to make a definitive judgment. More RAM allows the phone to keep more apps open in the background, reducing reload times and improving multitasking. A device with 4GB of RAM will perform significantly better than one with 2GB, regardless of the CPU.
