Google Pixel 6a vs BLU G91: A Deep Dive into Performance and Value
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Google Pixel 6a is the superior choice. Its Google Tensor chipset delivers significantly faster performance and a smoother user experience, complemented by a brighter display and a far more capable camera system. While the BLU G91 offers a lower price, the compromises in performance and features are substantial.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | BLU G91 | Google Pixel 6a |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 12, 17, 28 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66, 71 - GX7AS, GB62Z (USA/Canada) |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GX7AS (USA/Canada) |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/11.5 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 28, 30, 40, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - G1AZG (International) | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, February 24. Released 2021, February 24 | 2022, May 11 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2022, July 21 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), aluminum frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 163 x 76 x 9 mm (6.42 x 2.99 x 0.35 in) | 152.2 x 71.8 x 8.9 mm (5.99 x 2.83 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 196 g (6.91 oz) | 178 g (6.28 oz) |
| - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~429 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~82.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.1 inches, 90.7 cm2 (~83.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | OLED, HDR |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core 1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 | Octa-core (2x2.80 GHz Cortex-X1 & 2x2.25 GHz Cortex-A76 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | - | Google Tensor (5 nm) |
| GPU | - | Mali-G78 MP20 |
| OS | Android 10 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 15, up to 5 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 12.2 MP, f/1.7, 27mm, (wide), 1/2.55", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, 17mm, 114˚ (ultrawide), 1.25µm |
| Features | LED flash | Dual-LED flash, Pixel Shift, Auto-HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 16 MP, (wide), AF 5 MP, (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | - |
| Single | 16 MP | 8 MP, f/2.0, 24mm (wide), 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps; gyro-EIS, OIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP | 8 MP, f/2.0, 24mm (wide), 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.0, A2DP | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 3.1 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 18W wired, PD3.0 |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 4410 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Blue, Green, Twilight | Chalk, Charcoal, Sage |
| Models | - | GX7AS, GB62Z, G1AZG, GB17L |
| Price | About 150 EUR | $ 138.99 / C$ 228.74 / ₹ 23,999 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 94h |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
BLU G91
- Significantly faster performance with Google Tensor
- Superior camera quality and image processing
- Faster charging with PD3.0 support
- Higher price point
- Older model, may receive fewer future updates compared to newer Pixels
Google Pixel 6a
- Extremely affordable price
- Decent battery endurance (94h rating)
- Functional for basic smartphone tasks
- Slow performance with Cortex-A53 processor
- Inferior display quality
- Limited camera capabilities
Display Comparison
The Pixel 6a’s display is a clear winner, boasting a measured peak brightness of 876 nits compared to the BLU G91’s unspecified brightness. This translates to significantly better visibility outdoors. While both phones offer an 'infinite' (nominal) contrast ratio, the Pixel 6a’s OLED panel provides richer colors and deeper blacks. The BLU G91’s display technology is not specified, suggesting a lower-quality LCD panel. Bezels are likely larger on the BLU G91, further diminishing the viewing experience.
Camera Comparison
The Pixel 6a’s camera system is a major advantage. While specific sensor details are missing for both, Google’s computational photography prowess, powered by the Tensor chip, elevates image quality significantly. The BLU G91 likely features a basic camera setup, lacking features like Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) found in many Pixel models. The Pixel 6a’s image processing will deliver superior dynamic range, detail, and low-light performance. Ignoring the likely low-resolution macro lens on the BLU G91, the Pixel 6a offers a far more versatile and capable camera experience.
Performance
The performance gap between these devices is substantial. The Google Pixel 6a’s Google Tensor (5nm) chipset, with its Cortex-X1, A76, and A55 core configuration clocked up to 2.80 GHz, is in a different league than the BLU G91’s Octa-core 1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 processor. The Tensor chip’s 5nm fabrication process also offers superior power efficiency. The Pixel 6a will handle demanding apps, multitasking, and gaming with ease, while the BLU G91 will struggle with anything beyond basic tasks. The Pixel 6a likely utilizes faster LPDDR5 RAM, further enhancing performance.
Battery Life
Both phones share an endurance rating of 94 hours, suggesting similar overall battery life despite the significant performance differences. However, the Pixel 6a’s 18W wired charging with PD3.0 support is considerably faster than the BLU G91’s 10W charging. This means the Pixel 6a can be topped up much more quickly, minimizing downtime. While the BLU G91 might offer comparable talk time, the Pixel 6a’s more efficient chipset will likely translate to better real-world usage with demanding apps.
Buying Guide
Buy the BLU G91 if you need a functional smartphone for basic tasks like calls, texts, and light web browsing, and your budget is extremely limited. You're willing to accept slower performance and a less refined experience. Buy the Google Pixel 6a if you prioritize performance, camera quality, software updates, and a generally more premium user experience, even if it means spending more upfront. You value long-term usability and a feature-rich device.