The BLU G91 Max and Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive budget 5G smartphone market. While both aim to deliver a feature-rich experience without breaking the bank, they take distinctly different approaches to achieving this goal – one prioritizing raw processing power, the other focusing on efficient performance and rapid charging. This comparison dissects their key specifications to determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing long-term battery life and incredibly fast charging, the Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G is the clear winner. Its 67W charging capability and efficient Snapdragon 695 chipset outweigh the G91 Max’s slightly more powerful, but less efficient, Helio G95.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - Global |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 28, 38 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41 - Global |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - Global |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 78 SA/NSA - India |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, February 23 | 2022, February 28 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, February 23 | Available. Released 2022, March 23 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 168.6 x 77 x 8.9 mm (6.64 x 3.03 x 0.35 in) | 164.2 x 76.1 x 8.1 mm (6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 213 g (7.51 oz) | 205 g (7.23 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.8 inches, 109.8 cm2 (~84.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 700 nits, 1200 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6785V/CD Helio G95 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G76 MC4 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 11 | Android 11, MIUI 13 for POCO |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 108 MP, f/1.8, (wide) 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF
5 MP, f/2.2, 115˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0 | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Triple | - | 108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF - Global version
64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 0.7µm, PDAF - India version
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0 | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.1, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired
10W wireless | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 70% in 22 min, 100% in 41 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Gray, Sky Blue | Laser Black, Laser Blue, Poco Yellow |
| Models | - | 2201116PG |
| Price | About 200 EUR | € 160.40 / $ 419.99 / £ 255.00 / ₹ 12,940 |
| SAR | - | 1.06 W/kg (head) 1.09 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.60 W/kg (head) 0.96 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 119h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-26.8 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 335353 (v8), 384646 (v9)
GeekBench: 2063 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 17fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
BLU G91 Max
- Potentially higher peak CPU performance for short tasks.
- Includes wireless charging.
- May offer a lower price point (depending on retailer).
- Less efficient 12nm chipset.
- Slower 18W wired charging.
- Limited information on display quality.
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G
- Significantly faster 67W wired charging.
- More efficient 6nm Snapdragon 695 chipset.
- Integrated 5G modem for future-proofing.
- No wireless charging.
- Camera performance relies heavily on software processing.
- May be slightly more expensive.
Display Comparison
Both devices share an 'Infinite' (nominal) contrast ratio, suggesting typical IPS LCD characteristics. However, detailed display specs like peak brightness, color gamut coverage, and refresh rate are missing for the BLU G91 Max. The Poco X4 Pro 5G’s display, while lacking high-end features like LTPO, benefits from Xiaomi’s typically well-tuned color science. Without further data on the G91 Max, the Poco X4 Pro 5G likely offers a more refined visual experience.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but lack specific details. The absence of sensor size or aperture information makes a direct comparison difficult. However, given the market positioning, it’s reasonable to assume both utilize budget-friendly sensors. The Poco X4 Pro 5G’s camera system likely benefits from Xiaomi’s established image processing algorithms, potentially delivering more consistent and pleasing results. The G91 Max’s camera performance is harder to predict without further data.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The BLU G91 Max utilizes the Mediatek Helio G95, a 12nm process node chip with a focus on raw CPU power, boasting 2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 cores. Conversely, the Poco X4 Pro 5G employs the Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, fabricated on a more efficient 6nm process. While the Snapdragon 695’s Cortex-A76 cores clock slightly lower at 2.2 GHz, the smaller node and Qualcomm’s optimizations generally translate to better sustained performance and thermal management. The G95 will likely excel in short bursts, but the 695 will maintain performance longer during extended gaming sessions. The Snapdragon 695 also integrates a 5G modem, a key advantage for future-proofing.
Battery Life
Both devices achieve an endurance rating of 119 hours, suggesting similar battery life under identical usage scenarios. However, the charging capabilities are drastically different. The BLU G91 Max offers 18W wired and 10W wireless charging, a slower charging experience. The Poco X4 Pro 5G, on the other hand, boasts a remarkable 67W wired charging, capable of reaching 70% charge in just 22 minutes and 100% in 41 minutes. This charging speed is a significant advantage for users who prioritize convenience and minimal downtime.
Buying Guide
Buy the BLU G91 Max if you prioritize peak CPU performance for demanding applications and occasional gaming, and wireless charging is a must-have feature. Buy the Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G if you value all-day battery life, incredibly fast wired charging, and a more balanced, efficient overall experience, making it ideal for everyday use and moderate gaming.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Mediatek Helio G95 in the BLU G91 Max throttle under sustained gaming loads?
Given the 12nm process and the G95’s tendency to run warm, it’s highly likely the BLU G91 Max will experience thermal throttling during extended gaming sessions. While it may offer higher peak performance initially, the Snapdragon 695 in the Poco X4 Pro 5G is expected to maintain more consistent performance over time due to its more efficient 6nm fabrication.
❓ How does the 67W charging on the Poco X4 Pro 5G compare to standard fast charging?
67W charging is significantly faster than typical fast charging solutions. The Poco X4 Pro 5G can reach a 70% charge in approximately 22 minutes and a full charge in 41 minutes. This is a substantial time saving compared to 18W or 25W charging, allowing you to quickly top up your battery and minimize downtime.
❓ Is the lack of wireless charging on the Poco X4 Pro 5G a significant drawback?
For users who heavily rely on wireless charging, the absence of this feature on the Poco X4 Pro 5G is a notable omission. However, the incredibly fast 67W wired charging largely mitigates this drawback, as you’ll spend significantly less time tethered to a cable.
