Google Pixel 6a vs BLU G91 Max: A Detailed Comparison of Performance and Value
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Google Pixel 6a is the superior choice. Its Google Tensor chip delivers significantly faster performance and superior image processing, justifying the price difference. However, the BLU G91 Max presents a compelling option for those prioritizing absolute affordability and wireless charging.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | BLU G91 Max | Google Pixel 6a |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 28, 38 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66, 71 - GX7AS, GB62Z (USA/Canada) |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GX7AS (USA/Canada) |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 28, 30, 40, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - G1AZG (International) | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, February 23 | 2022, May 11 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, February 23 | Available. Released 2022, July 21 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), aluminum frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 168.6 x 77 x 8.9 mm (6.64 x 3.03 x 0.35 in) | 152.2 x 71.8 x 8.9 mm (5.99 x 2.83 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 213 g (7.51 oz) | 178 g (6.28 oz) |
| - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~429 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.8 inches, 109.8 cm2 (~84.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.1 inches, 90.7 cm2 (~83.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | OLED, HDR |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.80 GHz Cortex-X1 & 2x2.25 GHz Cortex-A76 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6785V/CD Helio G95 (12 nm) | Google Tensor (5 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G76 MC4 | Mali-G78 MP20 |
| OS | Android 11 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 15, up to 5 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 12.2 MP, f/1.7, 27mm, (wide), 1/2.55", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, 17mm, 114˚ (ultrawide), 1.25µm |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, Pixel Shift, Auto-HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 108 MP, f/1.8, (wide) 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF 5 MP, f/2.2, 115˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | - |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0 | 8 MP, f/2.0, 24mm (wide), 1.12µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps; gyro-EIS, OIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0 | 8 MP, f/2.0, 24mm (wide), 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.1, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired 10W wireless | 18W wired, PD3.0 |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 4410 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Gray, Sky Blue | Chalk, Charcoal, Sage |
| Models | - | GX7AS, GB62Z, G1AZG, GB17L |
| Price | About 200 EUR | $ 138.99 / C$ 228.74 / ₹ 23,999 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 94h |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
BLU G91 Max
- Significantly faster performance with Google Tensor chip
- Superior camera quality and image processing
- Long-term software support from Google
- Higher price point
- No wireless charging
Google Pixel 6a
- More affordable price
- Includes 10W wireless charging
- Acceptable performance for basic tasks
- Slower processor and less responsive performance
- Inferior camera quality
- Limited software updates
Display Comparison
The Pixel 6a boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching 876 nits measured, compared to the BLU G91 Max’s unspecified brightness. This translates to better visibility outdoors. While both likely utilize OLED panels (based on the Pixel 6a’s ‘infinite’ contrast ratio), the Pixel 6a’s superior brightness and Google’s color calibration offer a more vibrant and accurate viewing experience. The G91 Max’s display specs are minimal, suggesting a focus on cost reduction rather than visual fidelity.
Camera Comparison
While both phones likely feature multi-camera systems, the Pixel 6a’s image processing capabilities, powered by the Tensor chip, are a major advantage. Google’s computational photography excels in dynamic range, low-light performance, and overall image quality. The G91 Max’s camera specs are not detailed enough to make a direct comparison, but given its price point, it’s unlikely to match the Pixel 6a’s consistently excellent results. The Pixel 6a’s software features like Magic Eraser and Photo Unblur further enhance its camera experience.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Google Pixel 6a’s Google Tensor (5nm) is a substantial leap ahead of the BLU G91 Max’s MediaTek Helio G95 (12nm). The Tensor’s Cortex-X1 prime core, clocked at 2.80 GHz, provides a significant performance boost over the G95’s Cortex-A76 cores at 2.05 GHz. This difference is particularly noticeable in demanding tasks like video editing and gaming. The 5nm fabrication process of the Tensor also contributes to better thermal efficiency, reducing throttling under sustained load. While the G95 is adequate for basic tasks, the Tensor offers a far more responsive and future-proof experience.
Battery Life
Both devices share an endurance rating of 94 hours, suggesting similar real-world battery life despite potentially different battery capacities. However, the Pixel 6a supports PD3.0 fast charging, offering potentially faster and more efficient charging compared to the BLU G91 Max’s 18W wired charging. The G91 Max also includes 10W wireless charging, a feature absent on the Pixel 6a, which may appeal to users who prefer cable-free charging.
Buying Guide
Buy the BLU G91 Max if you need a functional smartphone with wireless charging on a very tight budget and aren't demanding in terms of performance or camera quality. Buy the Google Pixel 6a if you prioritize a smooth user experience, excellent camera capabilities, and long-term software support, even if it means spending more upfront.