The BLU G71+ and Nokia C200 represent the extreme end of the smartphone price spectrum. While both aim to deliver essential smartphone functionality at a low cost, they take drastically different approaches to achieving this. The G71+ prioritizes processing power with its octa-core Cortex-A75 CPU, while the C200 opts for a more energy-efficient, albeit less powerful, Mediatek Helio A22 chipset. This comparison will dissect these choices and determine which phone offers the best value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user needing a responsive experience for everyday tasks, the BLU G71+ is the clear winner. Its octa-core Cortex-A75 processor provides a significant performance advantage over the Nokia C200’s quad-core Helio A22, making it better suited for multitasking and app usage. While the C200 may offer slightly better battery efficiency, the performance trade-off is too significant for most.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 |
| 4G bands | 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 12, 17, 28, 66 | 2, 4, 5, 12, 13, 41, 66, 71 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE (2CA) |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, January | 2022, January 05 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, January | Available. Released 2022, Q2 |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 160.2 x 76.7 x 9 mm (6.31 x 3.02 x 0.35 in) | 156.5 x 73.1 x 8.8 mm (6.16 x 2.88 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 175 g (6.17 oz) | 172.5 g (6.10 oz) |
| | - | Splash protection |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) | 720 x 1560 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~282 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~83.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.09 inches, 91.0 cm2 (~79.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 | Quad-core 2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 |
| Chipset | - | Mediatek MT6761 Helio A22 (12 nm) |
| GPU | - | PowerVR GE8320 |
| OS | Android 11 | Android 12 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM | 32GB 3GB RAM |
| | - | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash | LED flash |
| Single | - | 13 MP, AF |
| Triple | 13 MP, (wide)
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 13 MP | 8 MP |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.2, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n/ac |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Accelerometer, proximity, barometer |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | - | 10W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4900 mAh | Li-Ion 4000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Bronze, Blue, Green, White | Meteor Black |
| Models | - | TA-1437, TA-1510 |
| Price | - | About 60 EUR |
| SAR | - | 1.11 W/kg (head) 1.33 W/kg (body) |
BLU G71+
- Significantly faster processor for smoother performance
- Better multitasking capabilities
- Potentially more responsive user interface
- Likely shorter battery life
- May run warmer under load
Nokia C200
- Potentially longer battery life
- Simpler user experience
- Lower price point (likely)
- Slow processor and limited performance
- Struggles with multitasking
- Less responsive user interface
Display Comparison
Neither device’s display specifications are provided, so a direct comparison is limited. However, given the price points, both likely utilize LCD panels with 720p+ resolutions. The Nokia C200, with its Helio A22 chipset, likely has a less powerful GPU, potentially resulting in lower display refresh rates and less efficient rendering. The BLU G71+’s more capable processor could support a smoother visual experience, even if the panel technology is similar.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, it’s difficult to make a definitive comparison. However, given the market segment, both phones likely feature basic camera setups. The Nokia C200’s Helio A22 chipset has a less powerful image signal processor (ISP) compared to what would be paired with the G71+'s processor, meaning image processing will be slower and less sophisticated. Expect lower dynamic range and more noise in photos taken with the C200. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on either device is largely a marketing gimmick and unlikely to deliver meaningful image quality.
Performance
The core difference lies in the processors. The BLU G71+’s octa-core 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 CPU represents a significant leap in performance over the Nokia C200’s quad-core 2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 processor found in the Mediatek Helio A22. While the A53 cores have a slightly higher clock speed, the A75 architecture is far more efficient and capable, offering substantially better single-core and multi-core performance. This translates to faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and a more responsive user interface on the G71+. The Helio A22’s 12nm process node is relatively efficient, but it can’t overcome the architectural advantage of the A75.
Battery Life
Battery capacity isn’t specified for either device. However, the Nokia C200’s Helio A22 chipset and less demanding processor are likely to result in better battery life per charge. The G71+’s more powerful processor will consume more power. The C200’s 10W wired charging is slow by modern standards, and the G71+’s charging speed is unknown, but likely similar or slightly faster. The trade-off is performance versus longevity; the G71+ will likely require more frequent charging but offer a more usable experience during its active time.
Buying Guide
Buy the BLU G71+ if you need a smartphone capable of handling more than just basic communication – think social media, light gaming, and occasional multitasking. It’s ideal for users who prioritize responsiveness and a smoother user experience. Buy the Nokia C200 if your primary needs are voice calls, text messaging, and extremely light app usage, and you prioritize simplicity and potentially longer battery life between charges. It’s best suited for first-time smartphone users or those needing a very basic backup device.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Nokia C200 struggle with popular apps like Facebook or WhatsApp?
The Nokia C200’s Helio A22 chipset is a very basic processor. While it can run apps like Facebook and WhatsApp, expect noticeable lag and slow loading times, especially with multiple apps open. It’s best suited for light usage of these platforms.
❓ Is the BLU G71+ capable of playing modern mobile games?
The BLU G71+’s Cortex-A75 processor is a step up, but it’s still an entry-level chipset. It can handle less demanding games at lower settings, but don’t expect a smooth experience with graphically intensive titles like PUBG or Genshin Impact. Frame rates will likely be low, and you may encounter stuttering.
❓ How much storage does each phone offer, and is it expandable?
Storage capacity isn't specified. However, budget phones typically start with 32GB or 64GB of internal storage. It's highly probable that both phones feature a microSD card slot for expandable storage, which is crucial given the limited internal space.
❓ What version of Android do these phones run?
Given their price point, both phones likely run an older version of Android, potentially Android 11 or 12 (Go Edition). Updates are unlikely to be frequent or guaranteed.
