The BLU G6 and BLU Vivo Go represent two distinct approaches to the ultra-budget smartphone market. The G6, with its newer Hummingbird chipset, aims for a performance edge, while the Vivo Go relies on the established, if older, Mediatek MT6739. This comparison dissects their key differences to determine which device delivers the best value for your money.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the BLU G6 emerges as the better choice. Its octa-core Hummingbird processor, based on the more modern Cortex-A55 architecture, provides a noticeable performance uplift over the Vivo Go’s quad-core Cortex-A53, making it more suitable for everyday tasks and light multitasking.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 - G0210UU | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 28 - G0210LL | 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 12, 17, 28 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/11.5 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps | HSPA 42.2/11.5 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | 2, 4, 5, 12, 17 - G0210UU | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2019, July. Released 2019, July | 2018, December. Released 2018, December |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 153 x 73.4 x 9.1 mm (6.02 x 2.89 x 0.36 in) | 156.7 x 75.2 x 8.4 mm (6.17 x 2.96 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 160 g (5.64 oz) | 155 g (5.47 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass | - |
| Resolution | 720 x 1440 pixels, 18:9 ratio (~282 ppi density) | 720 x 1440 pixels, 18:9 ratio (~268 ppi density) |
| Size | 5.7 inches, 83.8 cm2 (~74.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.0 inches, 92.9 cm2 (~78.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core 1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 | Quad-core 1.5 GHz Cortex-A53 |
| Chipset | Hummingbird | Mediatek MT6739 (28 nm) |
| GPU | IMG8322 | PowerVR GE8100 |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie) | Android 9.0 Pie (Go edition) |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC |
| Internal | 64GB 3GB RAM | 16GB 1GB RAM |
| | - | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 8 MP, AF
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash | LED flash |
| Single | 13 MP, AF | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash | LED flash |
| Single | 8 MP | 5 MP |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 720p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.1, A2DP | 4.1, A2DP |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | microUSB 2.0 | microUSB 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Browser | HTML, Adobe Flash | - |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Stand-by | Up to 550 h (2G) / Up to 500 h (3G) | Up to 600 h (2G) / Up to 550 h (3G) |
| Talk time | Up to 20 h (2G) / Up to 15 h (3G) | Up to 21 h (2G) / Up to 16 h (3G) |
| Type | Li-Po 2800 mAh, removable | Li-Po 2600 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Red | Black |
| Price | About 280 EUR | About 70 EUR |
| SAR | 0.61 W/kg (head) 0.49 W/kg (body) | - |
| SAR EU | 0.51 W/kg (head) | - |
| Tests |
|---|
| Audio quality |
Noise -90.6dB / Crosstalk -92.5dB | - |
| Camera |
Photo | - |
| Loudspeaker |
Voice 64dB / Noise 66dB / Ring 75dB | - |
BLU G6
- More modern octa-core processor for better performance.
- Cortex-A55 architecture offers improved efficiency.
- Likely smoother multitasking experience.
- Camera specifications are unknown.
- Display details are unavailable.
BLU Vivo Go
- Potentially lower price point.
- MT6739 is known for low power consumption.
- Sufficient for very basic smartphone tasks.
- Older quad-core processor with less performance.
- Cortex-A53 architecture is less efficient.
- Likely slower app loading and multitasking.
Display Comparison
Display specifications are not provided, so a direct comparison is impossible. However, given the price bracket, both devices likely utilize LCD panels with 720p resolution. The absence of information regarding refresh rates suggests both are limited to standard 60Hz. Bezels are likely substantial on both models, prioritizing cost reduction over premium aesthetics.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are listed as having a 'Photo' camera, which is insufficient for a meaningful comparison. Without sensor size, aperture, or megapixel counts, it’s difficult to assess image quality. However, given the budget nature of these phones, image quality will likely be similar – adequate for casual snapshots in good lighting conditions, but struggling in low light. The lack of detail suggests neither phone will excel in photography.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The BLU G6’s Hummingbird, featuring an octa-core 1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 CPU, offers a significant architectural advantage over the BLU Vivo Go’s Mediatek MT6739. The Cortex-A55 is more efficient and delivers better performance per clock cycle than the older Cortex-A53 found in the Vivo Go. While the MT6739 is fabricated on a 28nm process, the Hummingbird’s manufacturing process is unknown, but newer processes generally equate to better power efficiency. This translates to a snappier user experience on the G6, particularly when multitasking or launching applications.
Battery Life
Battery capacity and charging wattage are not specified. However, the more efficient Cortex-A55 architecture in the BLU G6 suggests it may offer slightly better battery life despite potentially having a similar capacity to the Vivo Go. The MT6739, while older, is known for its relatively low power consumption, but the performance deficit means it will likely spend less time actively processing tasks, potentially offsetting some of the efficiency gains.
Buying Guide
Buy the BLU G6 if you prioritize responsiveness and smoother performance for apps and basic gaming. Its newer chipset will handle daily tasks with less lag. Buy the BLU Vivo Go if your primary needs are extremely basic – calls, texts, and very light app usage – and you’re looking for the absolute lowest possible price point. The Vivo Go’s MT6739 is sufficient for these minimal demands.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the BLU G6 handle popular social media apps like Facebook and Instagram without significant lag?
Yes, the BLU G6’s octa-core Hummingbird processor and Cortex-A55 architecture are well-suited for running social media applications smoothly. While it won’t offer a flagship-level experience, it should provide a responsive and enjoyable user experience for these common tasks.
❓ Is the Mediatek MT6739 in the BLU Vivo Go sufficient for making calls and sending text messages?
Absolutely. The Mediatek MT6739 is perfectly capable of handling basic communication functions like making calls and sending text messages. Its power efficiency also contributes to longer standby times, making it a reliable device for these core smartphone features.
❓ Can either of these phones play modern mobile games like PUBG Mobile or Call of Duty Mobile?
While technically possible, neither phone is ideal for gaming. The Hummingbird in the G6 will offer a slightly better experience, but expect low graphics settings and potential frame rate drops. The MT6739 in the Vivo Go will struggle significantly with these demanding titles.
