BLU G51 vs Google Pixel 7a: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Google Pixel 7a is the clear winner, offering significantly superior performance, camera quality, and software experience. While the BLU G51 provides a very affordable entry point, the Pixel 7a's advanced features and Google's software support justify its higher price.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | BLU G51 | Google Pixel 7a |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 12, 17, 28, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71 - GWKK3, G0DZQ |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GWKK3 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GHL1X, G82U8 | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, June 03 | 2023, May 10 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, June 03 | Available. Released 2023, May 10 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), aluminum frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 155.3 x 73.5 x 9.5 mm (6.11 x 2.89 x 0.37 in) | 152 x 72.9 x 9 mm (5.98 x 2.87 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 166 g (5.86 oz) | 193.5 g (6.84 oz) |
| - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1520 pixels, 19:9 ratio (~276 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~429 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.1 inches, 92.9 cm2 (~81.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.1 inches, 90.7 cm2 (~81.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | OLED, HDR, 90Hz |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Quad-core 2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 | Octa-core (2x2.85 GHz Cortex-X1 & 2x2.35 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6761 Helio A22 (12 nm) | Google Tensor G2 (5 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | Mali-G710 MP7 |
| OS | Android 11 (Go edition) | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, up to 5 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | No |
| Internal | 32GB 2GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM |
| eMMC 5.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 8 MP Auxiliary lens | 64 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, Pixel Shift, Auto-HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, OIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP | 13 MP, f/2.2, 20mm (ultrawide), 1.12µm |
| Video | 720p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.2, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | microUSB 2.0 | USB Type-C 3.2 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | - | 18W wired, PD3.0 7.5W wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 3000 mAh | Li-Po 4385 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Green, Silver, Gold | Charcoal, Snow, Sea, Coral |
| Models | - | GWKK3, GHL1X, G0DZQ, G82U8 |
| Price | - | € 179.90 / $ 150.00 / £ 170.00 / ₹ 25,980 |
BLU G51
- Extremely affordable
- Decent battery life (potentially)
- Basic functionality
- Weak performance
- Low-quality camera
- Outdated chipset
- Limited software updates
Google Pixel 7a
- Excellent camera
- Smooth performance
- Bright and vibrant display
- Timely software updates
- Fast charging (wired & wireless)
- Higher price point
- Tensor G2 can get warm under heavy load
Display Comparison
The Pixel 7a boasts a significantly brighter display (1070 nits) compared to the BLU G51, offering better visibility outdoors and a more vibrant viewing experience. The Pixel 7a likely has a higher resolution and better color accuracy as well. The BLU G51's display is adequate for basic use but lacks the premium feel of the Pixel 7a.
Camera Comparison
The Pixel 7a's camera is a major selling point, known for its excellent image processing and computational photography capabilities. It consistently delivers impressive photos and videos in various lighting conditions. The BLU G51's camera is functional but lacks the detail, dynamic range, and overall quality of the Pixel 7a.
Performance
The Google Pixel 7a's Google Tensor G2 chipset and octa-core CPU utterly dominate the BLU G51's Helio A22. Expect noticeably faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and a more responsive overall experience on the Pixel 7a. The BLU G51 will struggle with demanding apps and games.
Battery Life
The Pixel 7a's endurance rating of 76h suggests excellent battery life. While the BLU G51's battery capacity might be similar, the Pixel 7a's efficient chipset contributes to longer usage times. The Pixel 7a also offers faster charging (wired and wireless) than the BLU G51.
Buying Guide
The BLU G51 is ideal for users on a very tight budget who primarily need a phone for basic communication and light tasks. The Google Pixel 7a is perfect for those who want a premium smartphone experience with a great camera, smooth performance, and timely software updates, without breaking the bank.