The BLU G50 and G51 represent BLU's continued push into the ultra-budget smartphone market. While both aim to deliver affordability, they take different approaches to core components, particularly in their chipsets. This comparison dissects those differences to determine which device offers the best experience for the price-conscious consumer.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the BLU G51 offers a slight edge due to its more modern, albeit still entry-level, Mediatek Helio A22 chipset. The higher clock speed of the Cortex-A53 cores provides a more responsive experience for everyday tasks, despite the core count difference. However, the G50 remains a viable option if found at a significantly lower price.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 12, 17, 28 | 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 12, 17, 28, 66 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, September 18. Released 2020, September 18 | 2022, June 03 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2022, June 03 |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 147.8 x 70.9 x 10.1 mm (5.82 x 2.79 x 0.40 in) | 155.3 x 73.5 x 9.5 mm (6.11 x 2.89 x 0.37 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 190 g (6.70 oz) | 166 g (5.86 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1440 pixels, 18:9 ratio (~293 ppi density) | 720 x 1520 pixels, 19:9 ratio (~276 ppi density) |
| Size | 5.5 inches, 78.1 cm2 (~74.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.1 inches, 92.9 cm2 (~81.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core 1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 | Quad-core 2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 |
| Chipset | - | Mediatek MT6761 Helio A22 (12 nm) |
| GPU | IMG8322 | PowerVR GE8320 |
| OS | Android 10 | Android 11 (Go edition) |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC |
| Internal | 32GB 2GB RAM | 32GB 2GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 8 MP
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 13 MP, AF | 8 MP |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| Video | 720p@30fps | 720p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.1, A2DP, LE | 4.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | microUSB 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | - |
| Type | Li-Po 4000 mAh | Li-Po 3000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Red, Green | Black, Blue, Green, Silver, Gold |
| Price | About 70 EUR | - |
BLU G50
- Potentially lower price point
- Octa-core CPU may offer better multi-tasking in specific scenarios
- Likely similar battery capacity to G51
- Less efficient Cortex-A55 architecture
- Lower CPU clock speed
- Likely slower overall performance
BLU G51
- More efficient Helio A22 chipset
- Higher CPU clock speed for better responsiveness
- 12nm process node for improved efficiency
- Fewer CPU cores
- Potentially slightly higher price
- Still an entry-level chipset
Display Comparison
Neither BLU provides detailed display specifications. Given their price point, both likely utilize LCD panels with 720p+ resolutions. The absence of information regarding brightness, color gamut coverage, or refresh rates suggests a focus on cost reduction over display quality. Expect similar viewing experiences in typical indoor lighting conditions, but neither will excel in direct sunlight.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are expected to feature basic camera setups. Without specific sensor details, it's safe to assume both rely on entry-level sensors. Image quality will be heavily dependent on software processing, and performance in low-light conditions will likely be poor on both. The absence of OIS or advanced features suggests a focus on functionality over photographic excellence. Any 2MP macro or depth sensors are likely to offer minimal benefit.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The BLU G50 features an Octa-core 1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 CPU, while the G51 utilizes the Mediatek MT6761 Helio A22 with a Quad-core 2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 CPU. While the G50 has more cores, the A53 architecture in the G51 is more efficient and operates at a higher clock speed. This translates to better single-core performance, crucial for app launch times and general responsiveness. The Helio A22's 12nm process node also offers a slight efficiency advantage over the likely larger node used in the G50's chipset. The G51 will likely handle basic multitasking and app switching more smoothly.
Battery Life
Both phones are expected to have similar battery capacities, likely around 4000-5000mAh, given their market segment. However, the G51's more efficient chipset (Helio A22) could translate to slightly longer battery life during typical usage. Both devices are limited to 10W wired charging, meaning a full charge will take a considerable amount of time – likely exceeding 3 hours. Battery life will be a key strength for both, but the G51 has a slight edge in efficiency.
Buying Guide
Buy the BLU G50 if you prioritize absolute lowest cost and are primarily using the phone for very basic tasks like calls, texts, and light messaging. Buy the BLU G51 if you want a slightly more responsive experience for social media, web browsing, and occasional light gaming, and are willing to spend a little more for that performance boost.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the BLU G51 handle popular social media apps like Facebook and Instagram smoothly?
The Mediatek Helio A22 in the G51 is sufficient for running basic social media apps like Facebook and Instagram. While it won't offer a blazing-fast experience, it should provide a reasonably smooth experience for browsing feeds and posting updates. Expect some slowdown with multiple apps open simultaneously.
❓ How long will it take to fully charge either the BLU G50 or G51 with the 10W charger?
With both devices limited to 10W charging, a full charge from 0% to 100% will likely take between 3 to 4 hours. This is a common limitation for phones in this price range, so patience is required. It's best to charge overnight.
❓ Can the BLU G51 run games like PUBG Mobile or Call of Duty Mobile?
While technically possible to install, PUBG Mobile and Call of Duty Mobile will likely be unplayable on the BLU G51 at acceptable frame rates. The Helio A22 chipset lacks the graphical power to handle these demanding games. You might be able to run simpler, less graphically intensive games.
❓ Is the difference in CPU cores (Octa-core vs Quad-core) significant between the G50 and G51?
Not necessarily. The G51's Cortex-A53 cores are more powerful and efficient than the G50's Cortex-A55 cores. The higher clock speed and improved architecture of the A53 cores outweigh the benefit of having more cores in this specific comparison. Single-core performance is more important for everyday tasks.
