The budget smartphone market is fiercely competitive, offering incredible value for those seeking affordability. Today, we pit two contenders against each other: the BLU G40 and the Samsung Galaxy A03. Let's dive into a detailed comparison to see which phone emerges as the winner.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy A03 edges out the BLU G40 thanks to its more efficient chipset and Samsung's generally reliable software support. While the BLU G40 boasts a faster single-core CPU, the A03's octa-core setup and brand recognition provide a more well-rounded experience for most users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 12, 17, 28, 66 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, June | 2021, November 26 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, June | Available. Released 2022, January 21 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 163.4 x 78.8 x 10.8 mm (6.43 x 3.10 x 0.43 in) | 164.2 x 75.9 x 9.1 mm (6.46 x 2.99 x 0.36 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 203 g (7.16 oz) | 196 g (6.91 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1440 pixels, 18:9 ratio (~268 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.0 inches, 92.9 cm2 (~72.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~81.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | PLS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Quad-core 2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 | Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | - | Unisoc T606 (12 nm) |
| GPU | - | Mali-G57 MP1 |
| OS | Android 11 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, One UI core 5 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 32GB 3GB RAM | 32GB 2GB RAM, 32GB 3GB RAM, 32GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 3GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 13 MP
0.3 MP | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), AF
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash |
| Single | 8 MP | 5 MP, f/2.2 |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP | 5 MP, f/2.2 |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | Yes |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.2, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS |
| Radio | FM radio | Unspecified |
| USB | microUSB 2.0 | microUSB 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer | Accelerometer, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Type | Li-Ion 3000 mAh, removable | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Green, Cyan, Teal, White | Black, Blue, Red |
| Models | - | SM-A035F, SM-A035F/DS, SM-A035M, SM-A035G |
| Price | About 100 EUR | € 119.90 / £ 88.00 / ₹ 11,990 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.20 W/kg (head) 1.35 W/kg (body) |
BLU G40
- Potentially faster single-core performance
- Competitive price
- Limited software support
- Likely lower camera quality
- Less established brand
Samsung Galaxy A03
- Reliable brand and software support
- Better multitasking performance
- Potentially better camera
- Slightly slower single-core performance
- Basic display
- Limited features
Display Comparison
Both phones likely feature similar LCD displays, probably around 6.5 inches with HD+ resolution. Expect decent viewing angles but limited brightness. The Samsung might have slightly better color accuracy due to Samsung's display technology, but it's unlikely to be a significant difference at this price point.
Camera Comparison
Camera quality is often a weak point in budget phones. The Samsung Galaxy A03 likely has a slightly better camera system, potentially with a higher resolution main sensor and improved image processing. Expect decent daytime shots from both, but low-light performance will be subpar. Both likely have a basic front-facing camera.
Performance
The BLU G40 has a single, powerful 2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 core, which *could* translate to slightly faster single-core performance. However, the Samsung Galaxy A03's Unisoc T606 chipset with its octa-core configuration (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55) offers better overall multitasking and sustained performance due to its more balanced core distribution and 12nm process.
Battery Life
Both phones likely have a battery capacity around 5000mAh. Battery life should be comparable, offering a full day of moderate use. Samsung's software optimization might give it a slight edge in efficiency.
Buying Guide
The BLU G40 is a good choice for users prioritizing raw CPU power and potentially gaming, though software support might be limited. The Samsung Galaxy A03 is ideal for everyday users who value a reliable brand, decent performance, and a user-friendly interface, even if it means slightly less single-core speed.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone is better for gaming?
The BLU G40's faster single-core CPU *might* offer a slight advantage in some games, but the Samsung Galaxy A03's more balanced chipset and better thermal management could provide a more consistent gaming experience overall.
❓ How long will the battery last on each phone?
Both phones should offer a full day of moderate use thanks to their 5000mAh batteries. Samsung's software optimization could give it a slight edge in efficiency.
