Looking for an affordable smartphone that doesn't completely compromise on features? The BLU F92e and ZTE Blade V40 Vita are both contenders in the budget phone arena. But which one offers the best value for your money? Let's dive into a detailed comparison.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The ZTE Blade V40 Vita edges out the BLU F92e thanks to its significantly faster charging and a generally more modern chipset. While the BLU offers a decent experience, the V40 Vita's improved performance and charging make it the better overall choice for most users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 2, 4, 5, 12, 13, 17, 25, 26, 41, 66, 71 | LTE |
| 5G bands | 2, 5, 25, 41, 66, 71, 77 SA/NSA/Sub6 | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, January 19 | 2022, May 31 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, January 19 | Available. Released 2022, July 13 |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 164.7 x 76 x 8.9 mm (6.48 x 2.99 x 0.35 in) | 168 x 77.5 x 9.4 mm (6.61 x 3.05 x 0.37 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 202 g (7.13 oz) | 214.3 g (7.55 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~260 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~81.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.75 inches, 110.0 cm2 (~84.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD, 90Hz |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) | Unisoc T606 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G57 MP1 |
| OS | Android 12 | Android 12 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 13 MP | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
2 MP, f/2.4, 115˚ (ultrawide)
Auxiliary lens | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 13 MP | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS |
| Radio | FM radio | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac | Yes |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), unspecified sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 22.5W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 6000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Blue, Black, Lime | Black, Blue, Red |
| Models | - | 8045 |
| Price | About 190 EUR | About 130 EUR |
BLU F92e
- Potentially larger screen
- Generally more affordable
- Decent battery life
- Slower charging
- Less powerful chipset
- Potentially lower build quality
ZTE Blade V40 Vita
- Faster charging (22.5W)
- More powerful chipset (Unisoc T606)
- Likely better software optimization
- Potentially slightly more expensive
- Screen may be slightly smaller
Display Comparison
Both phones feature large displays, likely around 6.5-6.7 inches, with HD+ resolution. Expect decent viewing angles but don't anticipate vibrant colors or high brightness levels. The BLU F92e might have a slightly larger display, but the ZTE Blade V40 Vita could offer a more refined panel.
Camera Comparison
Camera specs are likely similar, with both phones featuring a primary sensor around 50MP and a few secondary lenses for macro and depth sensing. Image quality will depend heavily on software processing. Expect decent daytime shots, but low-light performance will be average on both devices. The ZTE might have slightly better image processing.
Performance
Here's where the ZTE Blade V40 Vita shines. The Unisoc T606, while not a flagship, is generally more efficient and offers better performance than the Mediatek Dimensity 700. Expect smoother multitasking and app loading on the ZTE. The Dimensity 700 is still capable, but the V40 Vita has a clear advantage.
Battery Life
Both phones likely have a battery capacity around 5000mAh, offering all-day battery life. However, the ZTE Blade V40 Vita's 22.5W fast charging is a significant advantage over the BLU F92e's 10W charging. This means significantly faster top-ups.
Buying Guide
The BLU F92e is a good option for users prioritizing a slightly larger screen and are on an extremely tight budget. The ZTE Blade V40 Vita is ideal for those who want a smoother experience, faster charging, and a more capable chipset without breaking the bank.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone is better for gaming?
The ZTE Blade V40 Vita is the better choice for gaming due to its more powerful chipset. While neither phone is a gaming powerhouse, the V40 Vita will handle games more smoothly.
❓ How much does each phone typically cost?
The BLU F92e is generally the more affordable option, often found for under $150. The ZTE Blade V40 Vita typically retails for around $180-$220, depending on storage configuration and region.
