The budget smartphone market is fiercely competitive, offering incredible value for your money. Today, we're pitting two contenders against each other: the BLU F92e and the TCL 40 XL. Both promise affordability, but which one delivers the better overall experience?
🏆 Quick Verdict
The TCL 40 XL takes the win thanks to its faster charging, potentially better camera (based on general TCL trends), and a slightly more modern design. While the BLU F92e boasts a more powerful chipset, the TCL's overall package offers a more compelling value proposition for most users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 - USA |
| 4G bands | 2, 4, 5, 12, 13, 17, 25, 26, 41, 66, 71 | 2, 4, 5, 12, 13, 25, 26, 41, 66, 71 - USA |
| 5G bands | 2, 5, 25, 41, 66, 71, 77 SA/NSA/Sub6 | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, January 19 | 2023, February 26 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, January 19 | Available. Released 2023, May |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 164.7 x 76 x 8.9 mm (6.48 x 2.99 x 0.35 in) | 167.9 x 76.5 x 8.8 mm (6.61 x 3.01 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 202 g (7.13 oz) | 195 g (6.88 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~260 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~81.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.75 inches, 110.0 cm2 (~85.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD, 90Hz |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) | Mediatek MT6765 Helio G37 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | PowerVR GE8320 |
| OS | Android 12 | Android 13, TCL UI |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 13 MP | 8 MP, (wide) |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
2 MP, f/2.4, 115˚ (ultrawide)
Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, (wide), PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 13 MP | 8 MP, (wide) |
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with dual speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), unspecified sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 18W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Ion 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Blue, Black, Lime | Dark Gray |
| Models | - | T608M |
| Price | About 190 EUR | About 140 EUR |
BLU F92e
- More powerful chipset (Dimensity 700)
- Potentially better gaming performance
- Likely good battery life due to efficient chipset
- Slow 10W charging
- Potentially less refined camera
- May lack advanced camera features
TCL 40 XL
- Faster 18W charging
- Potentially better camera quality (based on TCL trends)
- Larger display (likely)
- More modern design
- Less powerful chipset (Helio G37)
- Slower app loading times
- Potentially less smooth multitasking
Display Comparison
Both phones likely feature LCD displays, but the TCL 40 XL's 'XL' designation suggests a larger screen size (potentially 6.7 inches vs. the F92e's likely 6.5 inches). Expect similar color accuracy and brightness levels, typical for budget devices. The TCL might have a slightly higher resolution.
Camera Comparison
Camera quality is often a weak point in budget phones. While specific specs are limited, TCL generally delivers decent camera performance in its budget offerings. The TCL 40 XL likely features a multi-lens setup, potentially including a macro lens. The BLU F92e's camera is likely adequate but may lack advanced features.
Performance
The BLU F92e's Mediatek Dimensity 700 chipset is significantly more powerful than the TCL 40 XL's Helio G37. This translates to smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and better gaming performance. The Dimensity 700's 7nm process also contributes to better power efficiency, despite the slower charging.
Battery Life
The TCL 40 XL's 18W charging is a significant advantage over the BLU F92e's 10W charging. While both phones likely have similar battery capacities (around 5000mAh), the faster charging means the TCL will recharge much quicker. Battery life itself will likely be comparable, with the Dimensity 700 potentially offering slightly better efficiency.
Buying Guide
The BLU F92e is a good choice for users prioritizing raw processing power for gaming or demanding apps, and who don't mind slower charging. The TCL 40 XL is ideal for those seeking a well-rounded experience with faster charging, a potentially better camera, and a more polished design, making it a better everyday phone.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone is better for gaming?
The BLU F92e is the better choice for gaming due to its significantly more powerful Dimensity 700 chipset.
❓ How long does each phone take to charge?
The TCL 40 XL charges much faster with 18W charging compared to the BLU F92e's 10W charging.
❓ Which phone has a better camera?
While specific camera specs are limited, the TCL 40 XL is likely to have a better camera overall, based on TCL's general camera performance in budget devices.
