The budget smartphone market is fiercely competitive, offering incredible value for those seeking affordability. Today, we're pitting two contenders against each other: the BLU F92e and the Samsung Galaxy A03. Let's dive into a detailed comparison to see which phone emerges as the winner.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The BLU F92e takes the lead thanks to its significantly more powerful Dimensity 700 chipset. While the Galaxy A03 offers the Samsung brand and potentially a slightly better display, the F92e's performance advantage makes it the better choice for most users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 2, 4, 5, 12, 13, 17, 25, 26, 41, 66, 71 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 2, 5, 25, 41, 66, 71, 77 SA/NSA/Sub6 | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, January 19 | 2021, November 26 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, January 19 | Available. Released 2022, January 21 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 164.7 x 76 x 8.9 mm (6.48 x 2.99 x 0.35 in) | 164.2 x 75.9 x 9.1 mm (6.46 x 2.99 x 0.36 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 202 g (7.13 oz) | 196 g (6.91 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~81.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~81.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | PLS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) | Unisoc T606 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G57 MP1 |
| OS | Android 12 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, One UI core 5 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM | 32GB 2GB RAM, 32GB 3GB RAM, 32GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 3GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM |
| | - | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), AF
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash |
| Single | 13 MP | 5 MP, f/2.2 |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
2 MP, f/2.4, 115˚ (ultrawide)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 13 MP | 5 MP, f/2.2 |
| Video | Yes | Yes |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS |
| Radio | FM radio | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | microUSB 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), unspecified sensors | Accelerometer, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | - |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Blue, Black, Lime | Black, Blue, Red |
| Models | - | SM-A035F, SM-A035F/DS, SM-A035M, SM-A035G |
| Price | About 190 EUR | € 119.90 / £ 88.00 / ₹ 11,990 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.20 W/kg (head) 1.35 W/kg (body) |
BLU F92e
- Significantly faster processor
- Better multitasking performance
- Potentially better battery life
- 5G Connectivity
- Less established brand
- Potentially less refined camera
- Slower charging (10W)
Samsung Galaxy A03
- Samsung brand recognition
- Potentially better display calibration
- Likely more versatile camera system
- Samsung ecosystem integration
- Slower processor
- Laggy performance
- Less efficient chipset
Display Comparison
Both phones feature a 6.5-inch HD+ display, likely with similar color accuracy and brightness. The Samsung Galaxy A03 might have slightly better color calibration due to Samsung's display technology, but the difference will be minimal for most users. Expect a resolution of around 720 x 1600 pixels on both.
Camera Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A03 likely has a more versatile camera setup, potentially including a depth sensor alongside the main camera. While the megapixel count might be similar, Samsung's image processing algorithms often produce better results. The BLU F92e's camera is likely adequate but won't stand out.
Performance
This is where the BLU F92e shines. The Mediatek Dimensity 700 is a substantial upgrade over the Unisoc T606. Expect noticeably faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and better gaming performance on the F92e. The Unisoc chipset in the A03 will feel sluggish by comparison.
Battery Life
Both phones likely feature a 5000mAh battery, suggesting all-day battery life for moderate usage. However, the BLU F92e's more efficient chipset could give it a slight edge in battery endurance.
Buying Guide
The BLU F92e is ideal for users prioritizing performance and smooth multitasking, even on a budget. The Samsung Galaxy A03 might appeal to those heavily invested in the Samsung ecosystem or who prefer a more established brand, even if it means sacrificing some processing power.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone is better for gaming?
The BLU F92e is significantly better for gaming due to its more powerful chipset. It will handle games with higher frame rates and less lag.
❓ Is the Samsung Galaxy A03 worth buying just for the Samsung brand?
If brand loyalty is your top priority, then perhaps. However, the performance trade-off is substantial. Consider if the benefits of the Samsung ecosystem outweigh the slower performance.
