BLU F92e vs Nokia C20 Plus: A Deep Dive into Performance and Value

The BLU F92e and Nokia C20 Plus represent opposite ends of the ultra-budget smartphone spectrum. The F92e aims to deliver a surprisingly capable experience with its Mediatek Dimensity 700 chipset, while the C20 Plus focuses on providing the absolute lowest possible entry point to smartphone ownership with a Unisoc SC9863A. This comparison dissects their key differences to help you determine which best suits your needs.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For the average user prioritizing responsiveness and future-proofing, the BLU F92e is the clear winner. Its Dimensity 700 chipset provides a significantly smoother experience for everyday tasks and even light gaming. However, the Nokia C20 Plus remains a viable option for those on the tightest of budgets who prioritize basic functionality above all else.

PHONES
Phone Names BLU F92e Nokia C20 Plus
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsHSDPA 850 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100
4G bands2, 4, 5, 12, 13, 17, 25, 26, 41, 66, 711, 3, 5, 8, 34, 38, 29, 40, 41
5G bands2, 5, 25, 41, 66, 71, 77 SA/NSA/Sub6-
SpeedHSPA, LTE, 5GHSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps
TechnologyGSM / HSPA / LTE / 5GGSM / HSPA / LTE
Launch
Announced2023, January 192021, June 11
StatusAvailable. Released 2023, January 19Available. Released 2021, June 16
Body
Dimensions164.7 x 76 x 8.9 mm (6.48 x 2.99 x 0.35 in)165.4 x 75.9 x 9.4 mm (6.51 x 2.99 x 0.37 in)
SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight202 g (7.13 oz)204.7 g (7.23 oz)
Display
Resolution720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density)720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density)
Size6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~81.5% screen-to-body ratio)6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~81.3% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeIPS LCDIPS LCD
Platform
CPUOcta-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x1.2 GHz Cortex-A55)
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm)Unisoc SC9863A (28 nm)
GPUMali-G57 MC2IMG8322
OSAndroid 12Android 11 (Go edition)
Memory
Card slotmicroSDXCmicroSDXC
Internal128GB 4GB RAM32GB 3GB RAM
 -eMMC 5.1
Main Camera
Dual-8 MP Auxiliary lens
FeaturesLED flash, HDR, panoramaLED flash
Single13 MP5 MP
Triple50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF 2 MP, f/2.4, 115˚ (ultrawide) Auxiliary lens-
Video1080p@30fps720p@30fps
Selfie camera
Single13 MP5 MP
VideoYes720p
Sound
3.5mm jack YesYes
35mm jackYesYes
Loudspeaker YesYes
Comms
Bluetooth5.0, A2DP, LE4.2, A2DP
NFCNoNo
PositioningGPSGPS
RadioFM radioFM radio
USBUSB Type-C 2.0microUSB 2.0
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/acWi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n
Features
SensorsFingerprint (side-mounted), unspecified sensorsAccelerometer, proximity
Battery
Charging10W wired10W wired
TypeLi-Po 5000 mAhLi-Ion 4950 mAh, removable
Misc
ColorsBlue, Black, LimeOcean Blue, Graphite black
Models-TA-1388, TA-1380
PriceAbout 190 EURAbout 90 EUR

BLU F92e

  • Significantly faster processor (Dimensity 700)
  • More responsive user experience
  • Better suited for multitasking and gaming

  • May be slightly more expensive
  • 10W charging is slow

Nokia C20 Plus

  • Extremely affordable
  • Potentially longer battery life during light use
  • Simple and easy to use

  • Slow processor (Unisoc SC9863A)
  • Laggy user experience
  • Limited multitasking capabilities

Display Comparison

Neither device boasts a standout display. Both likely utilize LCD panels, a common trait in this price bracket. However, details regarding resolution and brightness are missing. The key differentiator lies under the hood: processing power to drive the display. The F92e’s Dimensity 700 will handle UI animations and video playback more smoothly, even if the panel specs are similar. The C20 Plus’s Unisoc SC9863A may exhibit noticeable lag when scrolling or switching between apps.

Camera Comparison

Camera performance is likely to be similar in real-world usage, given the focus on affordability for both devices. Details on sensor sizes and image processing are unavailable, but it’s safe to assume both phones feature basic camera systems. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on the C20 Plus is unlikely to provide meaningful improvements in image quality. The F92e’s more powerful chipset *could* enable slightly better image processing, but the overall experience will be limited by the quality of the sensors themselves. Expect acceptable results in good lighting conditions, but struggles in low light.

Performance

The performance gap is the most significant difference. The BLU F92e’s Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7nm) is a substantial upgrade over the Nokia C20 Plus’s Unisoc SC9863A (28nm). The Dimensity 700’s Cortex-A76 cores, clocked at 2.2 GHz, offer significantly higher single-core performance, crucial for app launch speeds and responsiveness. The C20 Plus’s four Cortex-A55 cores at 1.6 GHz and another four at 1.2 GHz are geared towards efficiency, not speed. This translates to a much smoother user experience on the F92e, especially when multitasking or running demanding applications. The 7nm fabrication process of the Dimensity 700 also contributes to better thermal efficiency, reducing the likelihood of throttling under sustained load.

Battery Life

Both devices feature 10W wired charging, indicating a similar charging experience – slow by modern standards. Battery capacity details are missing, but the Unisoc SC9863A’s lower power consumption in the C20 Plus could potentially result in slightly longer battery life during light usage. However, the Dimensity 700 in the F92e is more efficient under load, and its faster processing allows for quicker task completion, potentially offsetting the power difference. Real-world battery life will heavily depend on usage patterns.

Buying Guide

Buy the BLU F92e if you need a phone capable of handling multitasking, streaming video, and occasional gaming without significant lag. It's ideal for users who want a device that feels relatively modern and won't become obsolete quickly. Buy the Nokia C20 Plus if you prioritize extreme affordability and only require a phone for basic communication – calls, texts, and very light app usage. It's best suited for first-time smartphone users or as a temporary device.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Will the BLU F92e be able to run popular social media apps like TikTok and Instagram smoothly?
Yes, the Mediatek Dimensity 700 chipset in the BLU F92e is more than capable of handling social media apps like TikTok and Instagram without significant lag. The processor's Cortex-A76 cores provide the necessary processing power for smooth scrolling and video playback, unlike the Unisoc SC9863A in the Nokia C20 Plus which may struggle with these tasks.
❓ Is the Nokia C20 Plus suitable for someone who primarily uses their phone for calls and texts?
Absolutely. The Nokia C20 Plus is an excellent choice for users who primarily need a phone for basic communication – making calls and sending texts. Its Unisoc SC9863A chipset is sufficient for these tasks, and its focus on affordability makes it a very cost-effective option. However, it's not recommended for anything beyond basic functionality.
❓ Can I expect to play any mobile games on the BLU F92e?
The BLU F92e can handle light mobile gaming. While it won't run demanding titles at high settings, games like PUBG Mobile (at lower settings) and less graphically intensive games should be playable. The Dimensity 700's integrated GPU provides a noticeable advantage over the C20 Plus for gaming.
❓ How long will it take to fully charge both phones?
Given that both phones support only 10W wired charging, expect a full charge to take approximately 3-4 hours. The actual charging time will depend on the battery capacity (which is currently unknown for both devices) and the charger used.