The smartphone landscape is vast, offering options for every budget and preference. Today, we're pitting a budget-friendly contender, the BLU F92e, against a classic flagship, the Google Pixel 2 XL. Can the newer, more affordable BLU compete with the Pixel's legacy?
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Google Pixel 2 XL decisively wins this comparison. While the BLU F92e offers a modern chipset at a lower price, the Pixel 2 XL's superior camera, display, and overall software experience make it the better choice, despite its age. It's a classic for a reason.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 2, 4, 5, 12, 13, 17, 25, 26, 41, 66, 71 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 2, 5, 25, 41, 66, 71, 77 SA/NSA/Sub6 | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (3CA) Cat15 800/75 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, January 19 | 2017, October 04. Released 2017, October 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, January 19 | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum/glass back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 164.7 x 76 x 8.9 mm (6.48 x 2.99 x 0.35 in) | 157.9 x 76.7 x 7.9 mm (6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 202 g (7.13 oz) | 175 g (6.17 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) | 1440 x 2880 pixels, 18:9 ratio (~538 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~81.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.0 inches, 92.6 cm2 (~76.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.35 GHz Kryo & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) | Qualcomm MSM8998 Snapdragon 835 (10 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 540 |
| OS | Android 12 | Android 8.0 (Oreo), upgradable to Android 11 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | No |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 13 MP | 12.2 MP, f/1.8, 27mm (wide), 1/2.55", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
2 MP, f/2.4, 115˚ (ultrawide)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps (gyro-EIS), 1080p@30/60/120fps (gyro-EIS), 720p@240fps (gyro-EIS) |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 13 MP | 8 MP, f/2.4, 25mm (wide), 1/3.2", 1.4µm |
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 3.1 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), unspecified sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 10.5W wired (capped), PD2.0 |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Ion 3520 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Blue, Black, Lime | Just Black, Black & White |
| Models | - | G011C |
| Price | About 190 EUR | About 520 EUR |
| Tests |
|---|
| Audio quality | - |
Noise - 93.7 / Crosstalk - 79.7 |
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 88h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: ∞ |
| Loudspeaker | - |
Voice 66dB / Noise 70dB / Ring 78dB
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 206711 (v7)
GeekBench: 6055 (v4.4)
GFXBench: 13fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
BLU F92e
- Modern Chipset (Dimensity 700)
- Affordable Price
- Decent Battery Life
- Lower Display Quality (LCD likely)
- Less Powerful Camera
- Potentially Less Software Support
Google Pixel 2 XL
- Excellent Camera (Google Computational Photography)
- Superior Display (OLED)
- Compact Size
- Smooth Android Experience
- Older Device (Potential Battery Degradation)
- Slower Charging (10.5W)
- Limited Software Updates
Display Comparison
The Pixel 2 XL boasts a stunning OLED display with an infinite contrast ratio, delivering vibrant colors and deep blacks. The BLU F92e likely has a standard LCD panel, which will be adequate but won't match the Pixel's visual quality. The Pixel's display is noticeably superior.
Camera Comparison
This is where the Pixel 2 XL truly shines. Google's computational photography is legendary, producing exceptional image quality even in challenging lighting conditions. The BLU F92e's camera is likely decent but won't match the Pixel's detail, dynamic range, and overall image processing.
Performance
The Dimensity 700 in the BLU F92e is a capable chipset for everyday tasks and light gaming. However, the Snapdragon 835 in the Pixel 2 XL, while older, still holds up well and offers smoother performance, especially in demanding applications. The Pixel's optimization and software support contribute to a more fluid experience.
Battery Life
Both phones are reported to have an endurance rating of 88h, which is impressive. However, the Pixel 2 XL's battery is older and may have degraded over time, impacting real-world performance. The BLU F92e's newer battery should offer better longevity.
Buying Guide
The BLU F92e is ideal for budget-conscious users who prioritize a modern chipset and don't need top-tier camera performance. The Google Pixel 2 XL is perfect for those seeking a fantastic camera, smooth Android experience, and a compact form factor, even if it means dealing with an older device and potential battery degradation.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Google Pixel 2 XL still worth buying in 2024?
Yes, if you prioritize camera quality and a compact form factor, the Pixel 2 XL remains a compelling option, especially at its current price. However, be mindful of potential battery degradation and limited software updates.
❓ What are the main differences between the BLU F92e and the Pixel 2 XL?
The Pixel 2 XL excels in camera performance and display quality, while the BLU F92e offers a more modern chipset and a lower price point. The Pixel also has a more refined software experience.
