BLU F91 vs Realme 9 Pro+: Which Mid-Range Mediatek Phone Reigns Supreme?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Realme 9 Pro+ is the superior choice. Its Dimensity 920 chipset provides a noticeable performance uplift, and the 60W charging is a game-changer compared to the BLU F91’s 18W wired and 10W wireless options. While the F91 offers wireless charging, the Pro+'s speed and overall package are more compelling.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | BLU F91 | Realme 9 Pro+ |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 2, 4, 5, 12, 13, 17, 25, 26, 41, 66, 71 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 2, 5, 25, 41, 66, 71, 77 SA/NSA/Sub6 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE-A, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - India | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, April 20 | 2022, February 16 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, April 20 | Available. Released 2022, February 21 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back |
| Dimensions | 168.7 x 76.8 x 8.9 mm (6.64 x 3.02 x 0.35 in) | 160.2 x 73.3 x 8 mm (6.31 x 2.89 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) |
| Weight | 209 g (7.37 oz) | 182 g (6.42 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~411 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.8 inches, 109.8 cm2 (~84.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.4 inches, 98.9 cm2 (~84.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | Super AMOLED, 90Hz, 430 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 810 (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 920 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G68 MC4 |
| OS | Android 11 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13, Realme UI 4.0 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 2.2 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide) 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 5 MP, f/2.2, 115˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | - |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0 | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP, f/2.4, (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/480fps, 720p@960fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0 | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | - |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n/ac, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired 10W wireless Reverse wired | 60W wired, PD3.0, 100% in 44 min (advertised) |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Blue | Midnight Black, Aurora Green, Sunrise Blue, Free Fire Limited Edition |
| Models | - | RMX3392, RMX3393 |
| Price | About 280 EUR | € 289.90 / $ 390.00 / ₹ 25,999 |
| SAR | - | 1.19 W/kg (head) 0.73 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 117h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -25.3 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 495096 (v8), 416031 (v9) GeekBench: 2335 (v5.1) GFXBench: 27fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
BLU F91
- Wireless charging capability
- Potentially lower price point
- Acceptable performance for basic tasks
- Significantly slower charging speeds
- Less powerful processor
- Limited camera details
Realme 9 Pro+
- Faster Dimensity 920 processor
- 60W fast charging with PD3.0
- Longer battery endurance (117h)
- No wireless charging
- Potentially higher price
- Limited information on camera specs
Display Comparison
The Realme 9 Pro+ boasts an 'Infinite' (nominal) contrast ratio, suggesting a high-quality panel, though specific brightness nits are not provided. The BLU F91’s display specifications are absent, making a direct comparison difficult. However, given its price point, it likely utilizes a less advanced panel. The Realme’s potential for deeper blacks and more vibrant colors will be noticeable to media consumers. Without knowing the F91’s panel type, it’s safe to assume the Pro+ offers a superior viewing experience.
Camera Comparison
Camera details for the BLU F91 are limited. The Realme 9 Pro+’s camera system, while details are missing, is expected to benefit from the more powerful ISP within the Dimensity 920. The chipset’s image signal processing capabilities will contribute to better dynamic range and noise reduction. Without specific sensor sizes or aperture information for either device, it’s difficult to make a definitive statement. However, the Realme’s more advanced chipset suggests superior image quality, especially in challenging lighting conditions. We can assume the Realme will have better video recording capabilities.
Performance
The Realme 9 Pro+’s Mediatek Dimensity 920 (6nm) represents a clear step up from the BLU F91’s Dimensity 810 (6nm). The 920 features a faster CPU configuration – 2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 vs 2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 – resulting in quicker app launches and smoother multitasking. While both chips are built on a 6nm process, the architectural improvements in the A78 cores provide a tangible performance advantage for the Realme. This translates to better gaming performance and a more responsive user experience, particularly for demanding titles. The Realme 9 Pro+ is likely to exhibit less throttling under sustained load.
Battery Life
The Realme 9 Pro+’s 60W wired charging with PD3.0 and advertised 100% charge in 44 minutes is a significant advantage over the BLU F91’s 18W wired and 10W wireless charging. While the BLU F91 offers the convenience of wireless charging, the speed disparity is substantial. The Realme 9 Pro+ can add a significant amount of charge in the time it takes the BLU F91 to reach a moderate level. The Realme 9 Pro+ also boasts an endurance rating of 117h, suggesting optimized power management alongside its faster charging.
Buying Guide
Buy the BLU F91 if you prioritize wireless charging and a lower price point, and are willing to compromise on processing power and charging speed. It’s a solid option for basic smartphone tasks. Buy the Realme 9 Pro+ if you value faster performance for gaming and demanding apps, and especially if rapid charging is a must-have feature. It’s the better choice for power users and those who frequently find themselves needing a quick top-up.