Google Pixel 6a vs BLU F91: A Detailed Comparison of Performance and Value
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Google Pixel 6a is the superior choice. Its Google Tensor chip provides a noticeably smoother and more responsive experience, coupled with Google’s exceptional camera processing. While the BLU F91 offers good value, the Pixel 6a’s performance and software support justify the price difference.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | BLU F91 | Google Pixel 6a |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 2, 4, 5, 12, 13, 17, 25, 26, 41, 66, 71 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66, 71 - GX7AS, GB62Z (USA/Canada) |
| 5G bands | 2, 5, 25, 41, 66, 71, 77 SA/NSA/Sub6 | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GX7AS (USA/Canada) |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 28, 30, 40, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - G1AZG (International) | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, April 20 | 2022, May 11 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, April 20 | Available. Released 2022, July 21 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), aluminum frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 168.7 x 76.8 x 8.9 mm (6.64 x 3.02 x 0.35 in) | 152.2 x 71.8 x 8.9 mm (5.99 x 2.83 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 209 g (7.37 oz) | 178 g (6.28 oz) |
| - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~429 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.8 inches, 109.8 cm2 (~84.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.1 inches, 90.7 cm2 (~83.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | OLED, HDR |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.80 GHz Cortex-X1 & 2x2.25 GHz Cortex-A76 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 810 (6 nm) | Google Tensor (5 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G78 MP20 |
| OS | Android 11 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 15, up to 5 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 12.2 MP, f/1.7, 27mm, (wide), 1/2.55", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, 17mm, 114˚ (ultrawide), 1.25µm |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, Pixel Shift, Auto-HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide) 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 5 MP, f/2.2, 115˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | - |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0 | 8 MP, f/2.0, 24mm (wide), 1.12µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps; gyro-EIS, OIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0 | 8 MP, f/2.0, 24mm (wide), 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n/ac, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired 10W wireless Reverse wired | 18W wired, PD3.0 |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 4410 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Blue | Chalk, Charcoal, Sage |
| Models | - | GX7AS, GB62Z, G1AZG, GB17L |
| Price | About 280 EUR | $ 138.99 / C$ 228.74 / ₹ 23,999 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 94h |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
BLU F91
- Superior performance with Google Tensor chip
- Exceptional camera quality and image processing
- Guaranteed software updates and long-term support
- Higher price point
- No expandable storage
Google Pixel 6a
- More affordable price
- Wireless charging and reverse wired charging
- Decent performance for everyday tasks
- Less powerful processor
- Inferior camera quality
- Limited software update commitment
Display Comparison
The Pixel 6a boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching 876 nits measured, compared to the BLU F91’s unspecified brightness. This translates to better visibility outdoors. While both phones likely utilize OLED panels (implied by the Pixel 6a’s ‘Infinite’ contrast ratio), the Pixel 6a’s superior brightness and Google’s color calibration offer a more vibrant and accurate viewing experience. The lack of refresh rate information for the BLU F91 suggests it likely operates at a standard 60Hz, while the Pixel 6a is expected to have a 60Hz panel as well, focusing on color accuracy instead.
Camera Comparison
The Pixel 6a’s camera system is a major advantage. While specific sensor details are missing for the BLU F91, the Pixel 6a benefits from Google’s renowned computational photography. The Tensor chip’s image signal processor (ISP) enables features like Magic Eraser and Real Tone, delivering exceptional image quality, particularly in challenging lighting conditions. The Pixel 6a’s image processing style prioritizes realistic colors and dynamic range, while the BLU F91 likely relies on more conventional image processing techniques. The absence of OIS information for the BLU F91 suggests it may struggle with low-light photography and video stabilization.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Google Pixel 6a’s Google Tensor (5nm) is a clear step up from the BLU F91’s MediaTek Dimensity 810 (6nm). The Tensor’s Cortex-X1 prime core, clocked at 2.80 GHz, provides a substantial performance boost over the Dimensity 810’s Cortex-A76 cores at 2.4 GHz. The 5nm fabrication process of the Tensor also contributes to better power efficiency and thermal management, potentially reducing throttling during sustained workloads. While the Dimensity 810 is capable for everyday tasks, the Tensor excels in AI-driven features and demanding applications.
Battery Life
Both phones share an endurance rating of 94 hours, suggesting comparable battery life despite potential differences in battery capacity (not specified for the BLU F91). However, the Pixel 6a’s 18W charging with PD3.0 support offers faster and more efficient charging compared to the BLU F91’s 18W wired and 10W wireless charging. The BLU F91’s reverse wired charging is a unique feature, allowing it to charge other devices, but the Pixel 6a’s optimized power management and potentially larger battery (implied by endurance rating) provide a more consistent user experience.
Buying Guide
Buy the BLU F91 if you prioritize affordability and wireless charging, and are comfortable with a less refined software experience. It’s a solid option for users who need a functional smartphone without breaking the bank. Buy the Google Pixel 6a if you value performance, camera quality, and long-term software support. It’s ideal for users who rely on their phone for demanding tasks, photography, and staying up-to-date with the latest Android features.