The BLU C7 and BLU C6 2019 represent the ultra-budget end of the smartphone spectrum. While both aim to deliver basic smartphone functionality at an incredibly low price point, subtle differences in their underlying hardware can impact performance and user experience. This comparison dissects those differences to help you choose the best option for your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing a slightly more efficient chipset, the BLU C6 2019 emerges as the better choice. The Mediatek MT6580, built on a 28nm process, offers a marginal advantage in power efficiency over the BLU C7’s Cortex-A7, potentially leading to slightly longer battery life during sustained use.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 900 |
| Speed | HSPA 21.1/5.76 Mbps | HSPA 21.1/5.76 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA | GSM / HSPA |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, May 22. Released 2021, May 22 | 2019, October. Released 2019, October |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 165 x 76.5 x 8.9 mm (6.50 x 3.01 x 0.35 in) | 159.6 x 76.6 x 9.1 mm (6.28 x 3.02 x 0.36 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 186 g (6.56 oz) | 185 g (6.53 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) | 720 x 1440 pixels, 18:9 ratio (~268 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~80.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.0 inches, 92.9 cm2 (~76.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Quad-core 1.3 GHz Cortex-A7 | Quad-core 1.3 GHz Cortex-A7 |
| Chipset | - | Mediatek MT6580 (28 nm) |
| GPU | - | Mali-400 |
| OS | Android 10 (Go edition) | Android 8.1 Oreo (Go edition) |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC |
| Internal | 32GB 1GB RAM | 16GB 1GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 8 MP
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash | LED flash |
| Single | 8 MP | 8 MP, 1/5.0", 1.12µm, AF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 720p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | LED flash |
| Single | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| Video | 720p@30fps | 720p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.0, A2DP | 4.1, A2DP |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | microUSB 2.0 | microUSB 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Stand-by | - | Up to 675 h (2G) / Up to 575 h (3G) |
| Talk time | - | Up to 22 h (2G) / Up to 18 h (3G) |
| Type | Li-Po 4000 mAh | Li-Po 2800 mAh battery |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Green, Red | Gradient Blue, Black, Red |
| Price | About 60 EUR | About 60 EUR |
BLU C7
- Simple and straightforward user experience.
- Likely very affordable.
- Functional for basic communication tasks.
- Older CPU architecture.
- Potentially lower battery life.
- Limited performance for demanding apps.
BLU C6 2019
- More efficient chipset (MT6580).
- Potentially better graphics performance.
- Slightly improved power management.
- Still limited by the Cortex-A7 architecture.
- Camera quality likely remains basic.
- May not be significantly faster in everyday use.
Display Comparison
Both devices lack detailed display specifications in the provided data. Given their price point, it’s safe to assume both utilize low-resolution LCD panels. The absence of information regarding brightness, color gamut, or refresh rate suggests neither device is geared towards media consumption. Expect basic visibility under normal lighting conditions, but limited performance outdoors.
Camera Comparison
Camera details are absent for both devices. Given the target market, expect very basic camera modules. Image quality will likely be subpar, particularly in low-light conditions. The absence of any mention of optical image stabilization (OIS) or advanced features suggests these cameras are intended for casual snapshots only. Any 2MP or lower resolution cameras on either device should be considered largely ornamental.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipset. The BLU C7 features a quad-core 1.3 GHz Cortex-A7 CPU, while the BLU C6 2019 utilizes the Mediatek MT6580, also a quad-core 1.3 GHz Cortex-A7. However, the MT6580 is fabricated on a 28nm process, a more mature node than what the Cortex-A7 likely uses. This means the MT6580 generally exhibits better power efficiency, translating to less heat generation and potentially longer battery life. While both CPUs share the same architecture and clock speed, the MT6580’s integrated GPU and modem may offer slight improvements in graphics performance and connectivity.
Battery Life
Battery capacity is not specified for either device. However, the Mediatek MT6580’s 28nm process gives it a slight edge in power efficiency. This means the BLU C6 2019 could potentially offer longer battery life on a single charge, even if both phones have similar battery capacities. Charging wattage is also unknown, so expect relatively slow charging times with either device.
Buying Guide
Buy the BLU C7 if you need a phone for extremely basic tasks like calls, texts, and light web browsing, and are less concerned with app responsiveness. Buy the BLU C6 2019 if you prefer a device with a more modern chipset architecture, potentially offering better performance in slightly more demanding applications and a more efficient power draw, even if the core CPU speed remains the same.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the BLU C6 2019 handle basic social media apps like Facebook and WhatsApp smoothly?
The Mediatek MT6580 should be capable of running basic social media apps like Facebook and WhatsApp, but don't expect a fluid experience with heavy multitasking or complex features. The Cortex-A7 architecture is aging, so responsiveness will be limited compared to more modern processors.
❓ Is the difference in chipset architecture between the BLU C7 and BLU C6 2019 noticeable in everyday use?
The difference is subtle. Both phones use the same Cortex-A7 cores clocked at the same speed. However, the MT6580’s 28nm process provides a slight efficiency advantage, which may translate to marginally better battery life and less heat during prolonged use. You likely won't notice a dramatic performance difference in simple tasks.
❓ Can either of these phones play modern mobile games?
Neither phone is well-suited for modern mobile gaming. While simple 2D games might be playable at low settings, demanding 3D titles will likely experience significant lag and frame rate drops. The integrated GPUs in both chipsets are very basic.
