The BLU C6L 2020 and Samsung Galaxy A01 Core represent the absolute bottom end of the smartphone market. Both aim to deliver basic smartphone functionality at the lowest possible price point, but they achieve this with different hardware approaches. This comparison dissects those differences to determine which device offers the most value for users prioritizing affordability.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user seeking a functional, if basic, smartphone experience, the Samsung Galaxy A01 Core edges out the BLU C6L 2020. The slightly higher clocked CPU and more efficient 28nm process provide a marginal, but noticeable, performance advantage in everyday tasks, justifying the often minimal price difference.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 12, 17, 28 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 21.1/5.76 Mbps, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, October. Released 2020, October | 2020, July 21. Released 2020, August 06 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 155 x 74.7 x 10.9 mm (6.10 x 2.94 x 0.43 in) | 141.7 x 67.5 x 8.6 mm (5.58 x 2.66 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Micro-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 167 g (5.89 oz) | 150 g (5.29 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1440 pixels, 18:9 ratio (~282 ppi density) | 720 x 1480 pixels, 18.5:9 ratio (~311 ppi density) |
| Size | 5.7 inches, 83.8 cm2 (~72.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 5.3 inches, 71.3 cm2 (~74.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | PLS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Quad-core 1.4 GHz Cortex-A53 | Quad-core 1.5 GHz Cortex-A53 |
| Chipset | - | Mediatek MT6739 (28 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-T820 | PowerVR GE8100 |
| OS | Android 10 (Go edition) | Android 10 (Go edition) |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 16GB 1GB RAM | 16GB 1GB RAM, 16GB 2GB RAM, 32GB 2GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash | LED flash |
| Single | 8 MP | 8 MP, f/2.2, AF |
| Video | 720p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP | 5 MP, f/2.4 |
| Video | 720p@30fps | - |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.0, A2DP | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | microUSB 2.0 | microUSB 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer | Accelerometer |
| Battery |
|---|
| Type | Li-Ion 3000 mAh | Li-Ion 3000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Red, Blue, Green | Black, Blue, Red |
| Models | - | SM-A013F, SM-A013F/DS, SM-A013G, SM-A013G/DS, SM-A013M |
| Price | About 50 EUR | About 150 EUR |
| SAR EU | - | 0.64 W/kg (head) 1.18 W/kg (body) |
BLU C6L 2020
- Potentially lower price point
- Simple Android experience
- Functional for basic tasks
- Slower processor
- Less efficient chipset
- Potentially less optimized software
Samsung Galaxy A01 Core
- Slightly faster processor
- More efficient chipset
- Samsung brand recognition
- May be slightly more expensive
- Limited camera capabilities
- Slow charging
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. Both are expected to utilize low-resolution panels, likely 720p+, given their price points. However, specific details like panel type (IPS vs. TFT) and brightness are unavailable. The focus here isn't on visual fidelity, but basic readability. The lack of information prevents a direct comparison, but both will likely struggle in direct sunlight.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance on both devices is expected to be extremely limited. Details regarding sensor size and image processing are unavailable, but both likely feature basic sensors. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on the A01 Core is largely marketing fluff; its limited resolution and lack of autofocus will result in subpar images. The primary camera on the A01 Core will likely offer slightly better image quality due to the more capable ISP within the MT6739 chipset, but expectations should remain low. Both phones are best suited for basic snapshots in good lighting conditions.
Performance
The Samsung Galaxy A01 Core’s Mediatek MT6739 chipset, fabricated on a 28nm process, holds a slight advantage over the BLU C6L 2020’s Quad-core 1.4 GHz Cortex-A53 CPU. While both utilize the Cortex-A53 architecture, the MT6739’s 1.5 GHz clock speed and more mature manufacturing process translate to slightly better sustained performance. This difference, though small, will be noticeable in app loading times and multitasking. The MT6739 also integrates a Mali-T720 MP2 GPU, offering a modest graphical boost over whatever GPU is paired with the C6L's CPU. Both phones will struggle with demanding games, but the A01 Core will likely offer a marginally smoother experience.
Battery Life
Battery capacity is not specified for either device. However, given their price points, both likely feature batteries in the 3000-4000 mAh range. The MT6739’s 28nm process offers a slight efficiency advantage over the Cortex-A53, potentially translating to marginally longer battery life on the A01 Core. Charging wattage is also unknown, but both are likely to ship with basic 5W chargers, resulting in slow charging times – expect several hours to reach a full charge.
Buying Guide
Buy the BLU C6L 2020 if you absolutely need the lowest possible upfront cost and are willing to accept slightly slower performance and potentially less optimized software. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A01 Core if you prioritize a marginally smoother user experience, benefit from Samsung’s brand recognition, and are willing to spend a little more for a slightly more refined package.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Samsung Galaxy A01 Core struggle with popular apps like WhatsApp and Facebook?
While the A01 Core can run these apps, expect slower loading times and occasional lag, especially when multitasking. The Mediatek MT6739 is a basic chipset, and these apps are not optimized for low-end hardware. Using 'Lite' versions of these apps is recommended.
❓ Is the BLU C6L 2020 a good choice for a first smartphone for a senior citizen?
The BLU C6L 2020 could be suitable for a senior citizen needing basic calling and messaging functionality. However, its slower performance might be frustrating for those unfamiliar with smartphones. A simpler user interface launcher is highly recommended.
❓ Can either of these phones play PUBG Mobile?
Playing PUBG Mobile on either device is not recommended. The processors and GPUs are far too weak to provide a playable experience, even at the lowest settings. Expect significant lag and frame rate drops.
❓ Do either of these phones support fast charging?
Neither phone is expected to support fast charging. They likely ship with basic 5W chargers, resulting in several hours to fully charge the battery.
