The BLU G5 Plus and C6L 2020 represent BLU’s commitment to affordable smartphones. While both aim for the budget-conscious consumer, a key differentiator lies in their processors. The G5 Plus boasts an octa-core CPU, while the C6L 2020 utilizes a quad-core design. This comparison will dissect the implications of this architectural difference and determine which device delivers superior performance for everyday tasks.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the BLU G5 Plus is the better choice. Its octa-core Cortex-A55 processor provides a noticeable performance uplift over the C6L 2020’s quad-core Cortex-A53, resulting in smoother multitasking and faster app loading times. While both phones target the ultra-budget segment, the G5 Plus offers a more responsive user experience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 - G0190UU |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 12, 17, 28 | 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 28 - G0190LL, G0190VV |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/11.5 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | - | 2, 4, 5, 12, 17 - G0190UU |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, October. Released 2020, October | 2019, July. Released 2019, July |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 155 x 74.7 x 10.9 mm (6.10 x 2.94 x 0.43 in) | 161.4 x 78 x 9.6 mm (6.35 x 3.07 x 0.38 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Micro-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 167 g (5.89 oz) | 181 g (6.38 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1440 pixels, 18:9 ratio (~282 ppi density) | 720 x 1440 pixels, 18:9 ratio (~268 ppi density) |
| Size | 5.7 inches, 83.8 cm2 (~72.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.0 inches, 92.9 cm2 (~73.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Quad-core 1.4 GHz Cortex-A53 | Octa-core 1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 |
| GPU | Mali-T820 | IMG8322 |
| OS | Android 10 (Go edition) | Android 9.0 (Pie) |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC |
| Internal | 16GB 1GB RAM | 32GB 2GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash | LED flash |
| Single | 8 MP | 13 MP, AF |
| Video | 720p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | LED flash |
| Single | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| Video | 720p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.0, A2DP | 4.1, A2DP |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | microUSB 2.0 | microUSB 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer | Accelerometer, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Stand-by | - | Up to 575 h (2G) / Up to 525 h (3G) |
| Talk time | - | Up to 20 h (2G) / Up to 15 h (3G) |
| Type | Li-Ion 3000 mAh | Li-Po 3000 mAh, removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Red, Blue, Green | Black, Red, Twilight, Chameleon Blue |
| Price | About 50 EUR | - |
BLU C6L 2020
- Potentially lower price point
- Simpler user experience for basic tasks
- May be more readily available in certain markets
- Significantly slower performance
- Struggles with multitasking
- Less responsive user interface
BLU G5 Plus
- Faster and more efficient processor
- Smoother multitasking and app loading
- Better overall user experience
- Likely slightly higher price
- May have limited RAM
- Camera performance likely still basic
Display Comparison
Given the limited data, we can assume both devices feature LCD panels typical of their price range. The absence of specifications like resolution or refresh rate suggests neither phone prioritizes display quality. Bezels are likely substantial on both, maximizing screen real estate within a compact form factor. Color accuracy is expected to be standard for budget devices, leaning towards warmer tones for perceived vibrancy.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, it’s safe to assume both phones feature basic camera setups geared towards casual photography. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on either device is likely more for marketing than practical use. Image quality will be heavily reliant on software processing, and low-light performance will likely be limited on both. The G5 Plus *may* have a slightly better image signal processor (ISP) integrated into its newer chipset, potentially leading to marginally improved image quality.
Performance
The core difference lies in the CPUs. The BLU G5 Plus’s octa-core 1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 processor represents a significant architectural improvement over the C6L 2020’s quad-core 1.4 GHz Cortex-A53. The Cortex-A55 boasts improved instructions per clock (IPC) and efficiency compared to the A53. This translates to faster processing speeds and better power management. The G5 Plus will handle multitasking, app switching, and moderately demanding apps with greater ease. While both likely have limited RAM (spec not provided), the G5 Plus’s CPU will manage memory more effectively. The G5 Plus will also likely have a better GPU, though specifics are unknown.
Battery Life
Battery capacity is not specified for either device. However, given their budget nature, both likely feature batteries in the 2500-3500 mAh range. Charging wattage is also unknown. The G5 Plus’s more efficient Cortex-A55 processor *could* translate to slightly longer battery life, even with a similar capacity battery. Without knowing charging speeds, it’s difficult to assess 0-100% charge times, but both are likely to take several hours.
Buying Guide
Buy the BLU C6L 2020 if your primary needs are basic communication – calls, texts, and light web browsing – and you prioritize absolute minimum cost. Buy the BLU G5 Plus if you want a more fluid experience for social media, occasional gaming, and multitasking, even if it means spending a bit more. The G5 Plus is the better option for anyone who doesn't want to constantly fight with lag.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the BLU G5 Plus handle popular social media apps like Facebook and Instagram smoothly?
Yes, the octa-core Cortex-A55 processor in the G5 Plus is well-suited for running social media apps. You should experience smoother scrolling, faster loading times, and fewer instances of lag compared to the C6L 2020.
❓ Is the difference in CPU cores noticeable in everyday use, or is it just a numbers game?
It's not *just* a numbers game. The Cortex-A55 architecture is more efficient than the Cortex-A53, meaning it can do more work per clock cycle. This, combined with having twice the number of cores, results in a tangible performance improvement in multitasking, app switching, and general responsiveness.
❓ Can the BLU G5 Plus handle basic mobile games?
The BLU G5 Plus should be capable of running basic mobile games, but don't expect high frame rates or graphics settings. The GPU is likely entry-level, so demanding titles may require reduced settings for playable performance.
❓ Which phone is better for someone who primarily uses their phone for calls and texts?
For basic communication, the BLU C6L 2020 is sufficient. The performance difference won't be noticeable for calls and texts, and it may be the more affordable option. However, even for basic use, the G5 Plus offers a more pleasant overall experience.
