The BLU C6L 2020 and BLU C6 2019 represent BLU's commitment to providing affordable smartphones. While both target the ultra-budget market, a closer look reveals key differences in their underlying hardware, particularly in the CPU architecture and chipset manufacturing process. This comparison dissects these differences to determine which device offers the best value for users prioritizing basic smartphone functionality.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user needing a basic smartphone for calls, texts, and light app usage, the BLU C6L 2020 is the better choice. Its Cortex-A53 CPU, while still entry-level, benefits from a newer architecture than the C6 2019’s Cortex-A7, offering slightly improved efficiency and responsiveness.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 900 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 12, 17, 28 | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 21.1/5.76 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, October. Released 2020, October | 2019, October. Released 2019, October |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 155 x 74.7 x 10.9 mm (6.10 x 2.94 x 0.43 in) | 159.6 x 76.6 x 9.1 mm (6.28 x 3.02 x 0.36 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Micro-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 167 g (5.89 oz) | 185 g (6.53 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1440 pixels, 18:9 ratio (~282 ppi density) | 720 x 1440 pixels, 18:9 ratio (~268 ppi density) |
| Size | 5.7 inches, 83.8 cm2 (~72.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.0 inches, 92.9 cm2 (~76.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Quad-core 1.4 GHz Cortex-A53 | Quad-core 1.3 GHz Cortex-A7 |
| Chipset | - | Mediatek MT6580 (28 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-T820 | Mali-400 |
| OS | Android 10 (Go edition) | Android 8.1 Oreo (Go edition) |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC |
| Internal | 16GB 1GB RAM | 16GB 1GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash | LED flash |
| Single | 8 MP | 8 MP, 1/5.0", 1.12µm, AF |
| Video | 720p@30fps | 720p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | LED flash |
| Single | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| Video | 720p@30fps | 720p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.0, A2DP | 4.1, A2DP |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | microUSB 2.0 | microUSB 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Stand-by | - | Up to 675 h (2G) / Up to 575 h (3G) |
| Talk time | - | Up to 22 h (2G) / Up to 18 h (3G) |
| Type | Li-Ion 3000 mAh | Li-Po 2800 mAh battery |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Red, Blue, Green | Gradient Blue, Black, Red |
| Price | About 50 EUR | About 60 EUR |
BLU C6L 2020
- More modern Cortex-A53 CPU architecture
- Potentially better thermal management due to CPU architecture
- Likely longer software support lifecycle
- Detailed specifications are limited
- Still an entry-level processor
BLU C6 2019
- Potentially lower price point
- Proven Mediatek chipset
- Suitable for basic smartphone tasks
- Older Cortex-A7 CPU architecture
- Less efficient 28nm manufacturing process
- Potentially shorter software support
Display Comparison
Unfortunately, detailed display specifications are unavailable for either device. However, given their price points, it's safe to assume both utilize LCD panels with 720p resolution. The lack of information prevents a comparison of brightness, color accuracy, or viewing angles. Users should expect a basic viewing experience on both devices.
Camera Comparison
Camera specifications are not detailed enough to draw meaningful conclusions. Both phones likely feature basic camera setups geared towards casual photography. Without knowing sensor sizes, apertures, or image processing capabilities, it's impossible to determine which device captures better photos. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on either device is unlikely to significantly impact image quality, serving primarily as a marketing feature.
Performance
The core difference lies in the processors. The BLU C6L 2020 features a Quad-core 1.4 GHz Cortex-A53 CPU, while the BLU C6 2019 utilizes the Mediatek MT6580 with a Quad-core 1.3 GHz Cortex-A7 CPU. The Cortex-A53, despite the slightly higher clock speed, represents a more modern architecture. The MT6580 is built on a 28nm process, which is less efficient than newer nodes. This means the C6L 2020 will likely exhibit better thermal management and potentially longer battery life under sustained load, even with a similar battery capacity (which is not specified). The Cortex-A53 also benefits from improvements in instruction set efficiency, leading to slightly faster performance in everyday tasks.
Battery Life
Battery capacity is not specified for either device. However, given the low-power CPUs, both phones should offer at least a full day of battery life with moderate usage. Charging wattage is also unknown, meaning we cannot assess the speed of charging from 0-100%. Users should expect a relatively slow charging experience with both devices.
Buying Guide
Buy the BLU C6L 2020 if you need a slightly more modern processor for smoother multitasking and a potentially longer software support lifecycle. Buy the BLU C6 2019 if you prioritize finding the absolute lowest price point and are willing to accept a slightly older, less efficient chipset. Both phones are suitable for first-time smartphone users or as a reliable backup device.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the BLU C6L 2020 handle basic social media apps like Facebook and WhatsApp smoothly?
Yes, the Cortex-A53 processor in the BLU C6L 2020 is sufficient for running basic social media applications like Facebook and WhatsApp without significant lag. While it won't offer a high-end experience, it should provide a usable experience for casual browsing and messaging.
❓ Is the Mediatek MT6580 in the BLU C6 2019 still a viable option in 2024?
The Mediatek MT6580 is an older chipset, but it remains viable for users with extremely basic smartphone needs – primarily calls, texts, and very light app usage. However, it will struggle with more demanding tasks and may exhibit slower performance compared to newer devices.
❓ Can either of these phones run popular mobile games like PUBG Mobile or Call of Duty Mobile?
Neither the BLU C6L 2020 nor the BLU C6 2019 are suitable for playing demanding games like PUBG Mobile or Call of Duty Mobile. The processors lack the necessary power and the GPUs are too weak to deliver a playable frame rate, even on the lowest settings.
