BLU Bold N3 vs. Google Pixel 7a: A Detailed Comparison of Mid-Range Powerhouses
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing camera quality and software experience, the Google Pixel 7a remains the superior choice. However, the BLU Bold N3 offers compelling performance and significantly faster charging at a potentially lower price point, making it ideal for power users and gamers.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | BLU Bold N3 | Google Pixel 7a |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 2, 4, 5, 12, 13, 17, 25, 26, 41, 66, 71 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71 - GWKK3, G0DZQ |
| 5G bands | 2, 5, 25, 41, 66, 71, 77 SA/NSA/Sub6 | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GWKK3 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GHL1X, G82U8 | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, July | 2023, May 10 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, August | Available. Released 2023, May 10 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, aluminum frame, glass back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), aluminum frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 164.2 x 74.7 x 8.8 mm (6.46 x 2.94 x 0.35 in) | 152 x 72.9 x 9 mm (5.98 x 2.87 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 180 g (6.35 oz) | 193.5 g (6.84 oz) |
| - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~388 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~429 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~90.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.1 inches, 90.7 cm2 (~81.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz | OLED, HDR, 90Hz |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.85 GHz Cortex-X1 & 2x2.35 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7050 (6 nm) | Google Tensor G2 (5 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 | Mali-G710 MP7 |
| OS | Android 13 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, up to 5 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 64 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm |
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, Pixel Shift, Auto-HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 112˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, OIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3", 1.0µm | - |
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 13 MP, f/2.2, 20mm (ultrawide), 1.12µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 66W wired, 100% in 39 min | 18W wired, PD3.0 7.5W wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 4700 mAh | Li-Po 4385 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Sage Green | Charcoal, Snow, Sea, Coral |
| Models | - | GWKK3, GHL1X, G0DZQ, G82U8 |
| Price | About 250 EUR | € 179.90 / $ 150.00 / £ 170.00 / ₹ 25,980 |
BLU Bold N3
- Significantly faster 66W charging
- Potentially lower price point
- Strong multi-core performance with Dimensity 7050
- Likely inferior camera quality compared to Pixel 7a
- Less refined software experience
Google Pixel 7a
- Exceptional camera quality and image processing
- Smooth and optimized software experience
- Efficient Tensor G2 chipset
- Slow 18W charging
- Higher price compared to BLU Bold N3
Display Comparison
The Pixel 7a boasts a measured peak brightness of 1070 nits, ensuring excellent visibility even in direct sunlight. While the BLU Bold N3’s display specifications are not provided, it’s likely to be lower, potentially impacting outdoor usability. The Pixel 7a’s OLED panel, combined with Google’s image processing, delivers vibrant and accurate colors. The absence of LTPO technology on either device means neither offers adaptive refresh rates for power saving, but the Pixel 7a’s superior brightness is a clear advantage.
Camera Comparison
The Pixel 7a’s camera system is its standout feature, leveraging Google’s computational photography expertise. While specific sensor details aren’t provided, the Pixel 7a excels in dynamic range, detail, and low-light performance. The BLU Bold N3’s camera specifications are not detailed enough to make a direct comparison, but it’s unlikely to match the Pixel 7a’s image quality without Google’s software optimizations. The Pixel 7a’s video capabilities are also superior, offering excellent stabilization and dynamic range. Ignoring typical 2MP macro lenses, the Pixel 7a’s focus is on delivering consistently high-quality photos and videos.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets: the BLU Bold N3 utilizes the Mediatek Dimensity 7050 (6nm), while the Pixel 7a is powered by Google’s Tensor G2 (5nm). The Tensor G2, with its Cortex-X1 prime core clocked at 2.85 GHz, offers a performance edge in single-core tasks and AI-driven features. However, the Dimensity 7050’s Cortex-A78 cores at 2.6 GHz provide strong multi-core performance. The 5nm fabrication process of the Tensor G2 generally translates to better power efficiency and thermal management compared to the 6nm Dimensity 7050, potentially leading to less throttling during sustained workloads. The Pixel 7a’s advantage in AI processing also enhances features like voice recognition and image processing.
Battery Life
The Pixel 7a has an endurance rating of 76 hours, suggesting good battery life despite its relatively slow 18W charging. The BLU Bold N3, however, features 66W wired charging, capable of reaching 100% charge in just 39 minutes. This is a significant advantage for users who prioritize quick top-ups. While the BLU Bold N3’s battery capacity isn’t specified, the faster charging speed mitigates concerns about a potentially smaller battery. The Pixel 7a also supports 7.5W wireless charging, a feature absent on the BLU Bold N3.
Buying Guide
Buy the BLU Bold N3 if you need a phone that prioritizes processing power for gaming or demanding apps and values incredibly fast 66W charging. Buy the Google Pixel 7a if you prefer a best-in-class camera experience, seamless software updates, and a refined user interface, even if it means sacrificing charging speed and some raw performance.