Google Pixel 7a vs BLU Bold N2: A Detailed Comparison of Performance, Camera, and Value
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Google Pixel 7a is the superior choice. Its Tensor G2 chipset delivers a smoother, more responsive experience, and its camera system is in a different league. While the BLU Bold N2 offers faster charging and a lower price, the Pixel 7a’s overall refinement and longevity justify the higher investment.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | BLU Bold N2 | Google Pixel 7a |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 2, 4, 5, 12, 13, 17, 25, 26, 41, 66, 71 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71 - GWKK3, G0DZQ |
| 5G bands | 2, 5, 25, 41, 66, 71, 77 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GWKK3 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GHL1X, G82U8 | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, August 11 | 2023, May 10 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, August 11 | Available. Released 2023, May 10 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), aluminum frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 158.7 x 74.1 x 8.6 mm (6.25 x 2.92 x 0.34 in) | 152 x 72.9 x 9 mm (5.98 x 2.87 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 180 g (6.35 oz) | 193.5 g (6.84 oz) |
| - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~390 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~429 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.6 inches, 106.9 cm2 (~90.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.1 inches, 90.7 cm2 (~81.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED | OLED, HDR, 90Hz |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.85 GHz Cortex-X1 & 2x2.35 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 810 (6 nm) | Google Tensor G2 (5 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G710 MP7 |
| OS | Android 11 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, up to 5 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | Unspecified | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 16 MP, (wide) 2 MP, (depth) | 64 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm |
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, Pixel Shift, Auto-HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 64 MP, (wide), PDAF 5 MP, f/2.4, 115˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, OIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 16 MP, (wide) 2 MP, (depth) | - |
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 13 MP, f/2.2, 20mm (ultrawide), 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n/ac, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 30W wired, 50% in 20 min | 18W wired, PD3.0 7.5W wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 4200 mAh | Li-Po 4385 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Cyprus Teal | Charcoal, Snow, Sea, Coral |
| Models | - | GWKK3, GHL1X, G0DZQ, G82U8 |
| Price | About 230 EUR | € 179.90 / $ 150.00 / £ 170.00 / ₹ 25,980 |
BLU Bold N2
- Superior camera performance and image processing
- Faster and more efficient Tensor G2 chipset
- Guaranteed software updates and long-term support
- Slower 18W wired charging
- Higher price point
Google Pixel 7a
- Faster 30W wired charging
- More affordable price
- Potentially longer battery life due to efficient chipset
- Inferior camera quality
- Less powerful Mediatek Dimensity 810 chipset
- Limited software update support
Display Comparison
The Pixel 7a boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 1070 nits, compared to an unlisted value for the BLU Bold N2. This higher peak brightness translates to better visibility outdoors under direct sunlight. While the BLU Bold N2’s panel specifications are unknown, the Pixel 7a’s OLED panel delivers vibrant colors and deep blacks. The Pixel 7a’s 90Hz refresh rate (implied by its class) also provides a smoother scrolling experience than the likely 60Hz panel on the BLU Bold N2.
Camera Comparison
The Pixel 7a’s camera system is its standout feature. While specific sensor details are not provided, Google’s computational photography prowess, powered by the Tensor G2’s image signal processor (ISP), delivers exceptional image quality, particularly in challenging lighting conditions. The Pixel 7a excels in both photo and video capture. The BLU Bold N2’s camera capabilities are less defined; without sensor size or aperture information, it’s difficult to assess its performance. It’s likely to offer a more basic camera experience, lacking the advanced features and image processing of the Pixel 7a. The absence of OIS on the BLU Bold N2 is a significant disadvantage for low-light photography and video stabilization.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Google Pixel 7a’s Tensor G2, fabricated on a 5nm process, offers a substantial performance advantage over the BLU Bold N2’s Mediatek Dimensity 810 (6nm). The Tensor G2’s CPU configuration – 2x2.85 GHz Cortex-X1 & 2x2.35 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55 – is architecturally superior to the Dimensity 810’s 2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55. The Cortex-X1 cores in the Tensor G2 provide a significant boost in single-core performance, crucial for app responsiveness and demanding tasks. The 5nm process also contributes to better thermal efficiency, potentially reducing throttling during sustained workloads. While the Dimensity 810 is capable for everyday tasks, the Tensor G2 offers a more future-proof and fluid experience.
Battery Life
The Pixel 7a has an endurance rating of 76 hours, suggesting good battery life despite its 18W wired charging. The BLU Bold N2, with its 30W wired charging, offers significantly faster charging speeds – claiming 50% charge in just 20 minutes. However, the Pixel 7a supports 7.5W wireless charging, a convenience the BLU Bold N2 lacks. The faster charging of the BLU Bold N2 is beneficial for users who frequently need to top up their battery quickly, but the Pixel 7a’s overall endurance and wireless charging option provide greater flexibility.
Buying Guide
Buy the BLU Bold N2 if you prioritize fast charging and are on a very tight budget, and are willing to compromise on camera quality and long-term software support. Buy the Google Pixel 7a if you value a premium camera experience, guaranteed software updates, and a more polished user interface, even if it means paying a premium and accepting slower charging speeds.