The sub-$200 tablet market is heating up, with the Blackview Tab90WiFi and Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 vying for dominance. Both offer a large-screen experience at an accessible price, but they take different approaches to performance and longevity. This comparison dives deep into the specs to reveal which tablet best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 emerges as the better choice. Its faster Helio G85 chipset and 18W (International) charging provide a noticeably smoother experience and quicker top-ups, outweighing the Blackview Tab90WiFi’s impressive battery endurance.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | N/A | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | N/A | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | N/A | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 13, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| EDGE | No | - |
| GPRS | No | - |
| Speed | - | HSPA, LTE - cellular model only |
| Technology | No cellular connectivity | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2024, June | 2024, July 29 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, June | Available. Released 2024, August 08 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3) |
| Dimensions | 256.9 x 168.5 x 9.5 mm (10.11 x 6.63 x 0.37 in) | 211.6 x 125.5 x 8.8 mm (8.33 x 4.94 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | No | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM (cellular model only) |
| Weight | 540 g (1.19 lb) | 370 / 373 / 375 g (13.05 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Mohs level 7 | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 800 x 1280 pixels, 16:10 ratio (~138 ppi density) | 800 x 1340 pixels, 5:3 ratio (~179 ppi density) |
| Size | 10.92 inches, 345.8 cm2 (~79.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 8.7 inches, 214.9 cm2 (~80.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD, 1B colors, 90Hz, 600 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Unisoc T606 (12 nm) | Mediatek Helio G85 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MP1 | Mali-G52 MC2 |
| OS | Android 14, DokeOS_P 4.0 | Android 14, HyperOS |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash | LED flash |
| Single | 13 MP | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP | 5 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/5.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | No | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS - cellular model only |
| Radio | No | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer | Accelerometer, proximity (accessories only), compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 18W wired (Int'l)
10W wired (India) |
| Type | 8200 mAh | 6650 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Ink Grey, Frost Blue, Blush Pink | Aurora Green (Forest Green), Sky Blue (Ocean Blue), Graphite Gray (Urban Grey) |
| Models | - | 220233L2G |
| Price | - | About 120 EUR |
| SAR | - | 0.90 W/kg (head) 0.65 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.40 W/kg (head) 0.99 W/kg (body) |
| EU LABEL |
|---|
| Battery | 128:54h endurance, 800 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class D | - |
| Free fall | Class C (136 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class B | - |
Blackview Tab90WiFi
- Exceptional battery life (128.54h endurance)
- Long-term battery health (800 charge cycles)
- Potentially lower price point
- Slower processor (Unisoc T606)
- Slow charging speed (10W)
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7
- Faster processor (Helio G85)
- Faster charging (18W International)
- More responsive user experience
- Shorter battery life compared to Tab90WiFi
- Potentially higher price
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a particularly high-end display, but details are lacking to make a direct comparison. Both utilize 12nm chipsets, suggesting similar power constraints impacting display capabilities. We can assume both are LCD panels given the price point. The Redmi Pad SE’s 8.7-inch size is slightly more portable than a potential larger screen on the Tab90WiFi, but without specific brightness or color gamut data, it’s difficult to declare a clear winner.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is unlikely to be a deciding factor for either tablet. Both are positioned as budget devices, and detailed camera specs are unavailable. It’s safe to assume both feature basic camera setups suitable for casual snapshots and video calls, but not for serious photography. Without sensor size or aperture information, a meaningful comparison is impossible.
Performance
The Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 holds a clear advantage in processing power. Its Mediatek Helio G85, with 2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 cores, outperforms the Blackview Tab90WiFi’s Unisoc T606 (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75). While both utilize the same Cortex-A75 architecture for peak performance, the higher clock speed of the Helio G85 translates to faster app loading times and smoother multitasking. The T606’s Cortex-A55 cores are clocked at 1.6 GHz, while the G85’s are at 1.8 GHz, further widening the performance gap. This difference will be most noticeable in demanding applications and gaming.
Battery Life
The Blackview Tab90WiFi shines in battery endurance, boasting a claimed 128.54 hours of use. This is likely due to the less power-hungry Unisoc T606 chipset. However, the Redmi Pad SE 8.7 compensates with faster charging – 18W (International) versus the Tab90WiFi’s 10W. While the Tab90WiFi offers longer runtimes, the Redmi Pad SE’s quicker charging means less downtime. The 800 charge cycles claim for the Tab90WiFi suggests a focus on long-term battery health, but the slower charging speed is a trade-off.
Buying Guide
Buy the Blackview Tab90WiFi if you prioritize maximum battery life and are willing to accept slightly slower performance for extended use cases like offline video playback or reading. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 if you value a more responsive user experience, faster charging, and a generally more fluid interface, even if it means slightly less time between charges.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Unisoc T606 in the Blackview Tab90WiFi struggle with demanding games?
Yes, the Unisoc T606 is a budget-focused chipset. While it can handle casual gaming, more graphically intensive titles will likely require reduced settings and may still experience frame drops. The Redmi Pad SE 8.7’s Helio G85 offers a significantly better gaming experience.
❓ Is the 18W charging on the Redmi Pad SE 8.7 universally available, or is it region-dependent?
The 18W charging is available on the international version of the Redmi Pad SE 8.7. However, the Indian variant is limited to 10W charging. This is a crucial distinction for users in India, as it significantly impacts charging times.
❓ How does the 800 charge cycle claim for the Blackview Tab90WiFi translate to real-world battery lifespan?
The 800 charge cycle claim suggests the battery is designed to retain a significant portion of its capacity after 800 full charge-discharge cycles. This indicates a focus on long-term battery health, potentially extending the usable lifespan of the tablet compared to devices with lower cycle counts.
