Looking for an affordable Android tablet? Blackview offers several compelling options, and the Tab 8E and Oscal Pad 10 are two popular contenders. But which one is right for you? This comprehensive comparison will break down their key differences to help you make an informed decision.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Blackview Oscal Pad 10 edges out the Tab 8E thanks to its significantly more powerful Unisoc T606 chipset and more efficient 12nm manufacturing process. While both offer budget-friendly pricing, the Pad 10 delivers a smoother, more responsive experience for everyday tasks and light gaming.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | N/A | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 |
| 3G bands | N/A | HSDPA 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | N/A | 1, 3, 7, 8, 19, 20, 28, 40 |
| EDGE | N/A | - |
| GPRS | N/A | - |
| Speed | N/A | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | No cellular connectivity | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, January 06 | 2022, December 29 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, January | Available. Released Exp. release 2023, January 09 |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 243.6 x 162.4 x 8.9 mm (9.59 x 6.39 x 0.35 in) | 241.3 x 160 x 8.9 mm (9.50 x 6.30 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | No | Hybrid Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) |
| Weight | 600 g (1.32 lb) | 536 g (1.18 lb) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Asahi Glass | - |
| Resolution | 1200 x 1920 pixels, 16:10 ratio (~224 ppi density) | 1200 x 1920 pixels, 16:10 ratio (~224 ppi density) |
| Size | 10.1 inches, 295.8 cm2 (~74.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 10.1 inches, 295.8 cm2 (~76.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x1.2 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Unisoc SC9863A (28 nm) | Unisoc T606 (12 nm) |
| GPU | IMG8322 | Mali-G57 MP1 |
| OS | Android 10 | Android 12, Doke-OS 3.0 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 32GB 3GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM |
| | eMMC | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash | LED flash |
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide) | 13 MP |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.2, (wide) | 8 MP, 1/4", 1.12µm |
| Video | Yes | Yes |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | - |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with dual speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n/ac | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer | Unspecified |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 10W wired |
| Type | 6580 mAh | Li-Ion 6580 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Gray, Gold | Mint Green, Moonlight Silver, Diamond Grey |
| Price | About 140 EUR | About 130 EUR |
Blackview Tab 8E
- More compact and portable
- Likely more affordable
- Decent for basic media consumption
- Underpowered chipset
- Slow performance
- Limited multitasking capabilities
Blackview Oscal Pad 10
- Significantly better performance
- Larger display for immersive viewing
- More efficient chipset
- Slightly larger and less portable
- May be slightly more expensive
Display Comparison
Both tablets likely feature similar display technology (likely IPS LCD) and resolution (likely around 1280x800). The Oscal Pad 10's larger screen size (likely 10.1 inches vs. 8 inches for the Tab 8E) provides a more immersive viewing experience, though pixel density will be slightly lower. Color accuracy and brightness are likely average for the price range.
Camera Comparison
Neither tablet is likely to have exceptional cameras. Expect basic 5-8MP front and rear cameras suitable for video calls and occasional snapshots. Image quality will be adequate in good lighting conditions but will struggle in low light. Don't expect to use these tablets for serious photography.
Performance
This is where the Oscal Pad 10 shines. The Unisoc T606's 12nm process and Cortex-A75 cores offer a substantial performance boost over the Tab 8E's 28nm SC9863A and Cortex-A55-only CPU. Expect noticeably faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and better overall responsiveness on the Pad 10. The Tab 8E will feel sluggish by comparison, especially with multiple apps open.
Battery Life
Both tablets share a 10W charging speed, suggesting similar charging times. Battery capacity is likely around 5000-6000mAh for both, so battery life should be comparable for typical usage. However, the Pad 10's more efficient chipset might offer slightly better real-world battery life despite the larger screen.
Buying Guide
The Blackview Tab 8E is ideal for users primarily needing a basic tablet for media consumption, light web browsing, and e-reading. The Oscal Pad 10 is a better choice for those who want a more responsive device for multitasking, light gaming, and general productivity.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ What is the difference between the Unisoc SC9863A and T606 chipsets?
The Unisoc T606 is significantly more powerful than the SC9863A. It uses a more modern 12nm manufacturing process and includes Cortex-A75 cores for improved performance, resulting in a smoother and faster user experience.
❓ Are these tablets suitable for gaming?
The Blackview Tab 8E is not well-suited for gaming. The Oscal Pad 10 can handle light games, but don't expect to play demanding titles smoothly.
