The tablet market is booming, and budget options are increasingly appealing. Today, we're pitting two contenders against each other: the Blackview Tab 7 and the Xiaomi Redmi Pad. Both promise affordability, but which one delivers the best overall experience?
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Xiaomi Redmi Pad takes the crown. While the Blackview Tab 7 is a budget-friendly option, the Redmi Pad's superior chipset, brighter display, faster charging, and generally more polished software make it the clear winner for most users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | N/A |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 900 / 2100 | N/A |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 40 | N/A |
| EDGE | - | N/A |
| GPRS | - | N/A |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | - |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | No cellular connectivity |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, July 05 | 2022, October 04 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, July 05 | Available. Released 2022, October 05 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 241.3 x 160 x 8.9 mm (9.50 x 6.30 x 0.35 in) | 250.5 x 158.1 x 7.1 mm (9.86 x 6.22 x 0.28 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | No |
| Weight | 536 g (1.18 lb) | 465 g (1.03 lb) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Asahi Glass | - |
| Resolution | 800 x 1280 pixels, 16:10 ratio (~149 ppi density) | 1200 x 2000 pixels, 5:3 ratio (~220 ppi density) |
| Size | 10.1 inches, 295.8 cm2 (~76.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 10.61 inches, 320.4 cm2 (~80.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD, 1B colors, 90Hz, 400 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Quad-core (1x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 3x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Unisoc Tiger T310 (12 nm) | Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8300 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 11 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13, MIUI 14 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC |
| Internal | 32GB 3GB RAM | 64GB 3GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash | - |
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.0 | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide), AF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 2 MP, f/2.8 | 8 MP, f/2.3, 105° (ultrawide) |
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers (4 speakers) |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | No |
| Radio | FM Radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer | Accelerometer |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 18W wired |
| Type | 6580 mAh | Li-Po 8000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Grey, Blue, Silver | Graphite Gray, Moonlight Silver, Mint Green |
| Models | - | 22081283G |
| Price | About 140 EUR | About 250 EUR |
| SAR EU | - | 0.36 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1529:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-23.9 LUFS (Very good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 319077 (v9)
GeekBench: 1852 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 13fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Blackview Tab 7
- Very affordable
- Decent for basic tasks
- Relatively compact
- Weak performance
- Slow charging
- Likely lower display brightness
- Less polished software
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
- Stronger performance
- Brighter display
- Faster charging
- Better software experience
- Good value for money
- Can still be slow with demanding games
- Camera is not exceptional
Display Comparison
The Xiaomi Redmi Pad boasts a significantly brighter display (402 nits vs. likely lower on the Tab 7, though specific Tab 7 brightness is hard to confirm). Both offer a 1529:1 contrast ratio, but the Redmi Pad's higher brightness will result in a more vibrant and enjoyable viewing experience, especially outdoors. The Redmi Pad also likely has better color accuracy.
Camera Comparison
Camera quality is generally not a strong point for budget tablets. However, the Redmi Pad likely has a slightly better camera setup due to Xiaomi's generally better camera hardware. Expect passable image quality on both, but don't expect flagship-level results.
Performance
Here, the Redmi Pad pulls ahead considerably. Its Mediatek Helio G99 chipset (6nm) is a substantial upgrade over the Blackview Tab 7's Unisoc Tiger T310 (12nm). The G99 offers a more powerful CPU and GPU, resulting in smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and better gaming performance. The octa-core configuration of the Redmi Pad also contributes to its superior performance.
Battery Life
The Redmi Pad's 18W charging is a significant advantage. The Blackview Tab 7's 10W charging will take considerably longer to fully charge the device. Battery capacity is likely similar between the two, but the faster charging speeds of the Redmi Pad make it more convenient.
Buying Guide
The Blackview Tab 7 is best suited for users on a *very* tight budget who primarily need a tablet for basic tasks like web browsing and media consumption. The Xiaomi Redmi Pad is ideal for students, casual gamers, and anyone seeking a well-rounded tablet experience without breaking the bank.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Blackview Tab 7 good for gaming?
The Blackview Tab 7 is not ideal for gaming. Its chipset struggles with even moderately demanding games. The Xiaomi Redmi Pad offers a much better gaming experience.
❓ Which tablet has better battery life?
While battery capacity is likely similar, the Xiaomi Redmi Pad's faster charging makes it more convenient. Both should offer a full day of moderate use.
❓ What is the difference between the Unisoc Tiger T310 and the Mediatek Helio G99?
The Mediatek Helio G99 is significantly more powerful than the Unisoc Tiger T310. It offers better CPU and GPU performance, resulting in a smoother and more responsive user experience.
