The Android tablet market offers a wide range of options, but narrowing down the field can be challenging. We're pitting the Blackview Tab 12, a budget-focused offering, against the Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro 12.4, a device aiming for a more premium experience. This comparison will focus on how their core specifications translate into real-world usability, particularly concerning performance and charging capabilities.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing performance and convenience, the Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro 12.4 is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 870 chipset delivers significantly faster processing speeds, and the 67W fast charging drastically reduces downtime. The Blackview Tab 12 remains a viable option for those on a very tight budget and with basic tablet needs.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | N/A |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 900 / 2100 | N/A |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 40 | N/A |
| EDGE | - | No |
| GPRS | - | No |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | - |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | No cellular connectivity |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, May 15 | 2022, August 11 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, May 31 | Available. Released 2022, August 24 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), aluminum frame, aluminum back |
| Dimensions | 238.5 x 157.5 x 7.4 mm (9.39 x 6.20 x 0.29 in) | 285 x 185.2 x 6.7 mm (11.22 x 7.29 x 0.26 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | No |
| Weight | 430 g (15.17 oz) | 620 g (1.37 lb) |
| | - | Stylus support (magnetic) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Asahi Glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1200 x 1920 pixels, 16:10 ratio (~224 ppi density) | 1600 x 2560 pixels, 16:10 ratio (~243 ppi density) |
| Size | 10.1 inches, 295.8 cm2 (~78.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 12.4 inches, 445.8 cm2 (~84.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD, 120Hz, HDR10, Dolby Vision, 500 nits |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x1.2 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) |
| Chipset | Unisoc SC9863A (28 nm) | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm) |
| GPU | IMG8322 | Adreno 650 |
| OS | Android 11 | Android 12, MIUI Pad 13 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | No |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash, HDR | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide) | - |
| Video | 1440p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.2, (wide) | 20 MP, f/2.2, 1/3.4", 0.8µm |
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers (4 speakers) |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS | No |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2 video output |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer | Accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 60% in 36 min, 100% in 68 min |
| Type | 6580 mAh | Li-Po 10000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Gray, Blue, Silver | Black, Silver, Green |
| Price | About 160 EUR | About 400 EUR |
Blackview Tab 12
- Significantly lower price point
- Potentially longer battery life due to less powerful processor
- Acceptable for basic tablet tasks
- Very slow charging speed (10W)
- Substantially weaker performance compared to the Xiaomi
- Older, less efficient chipset
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro 12.4
- Flagship-level performance with Snapdragon 870
- Ultra-fast 67W charging
- Superior image processing capabilities
- Higher price tag
- Potentially shorter battery life under heavy load
- May be overkill for basic tablet users
Display Comparison
While both tablets feature a 12.4-inch display, the specifics are not provided for the Blackview Tab 12. The Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro 12.4’s display benefits from the Snapdragon 870’s image signal processor, potentially offering better color calibration and dynamic range. The lack of detailed display specs for the Blackview Tab 12 makes a direct comparison difficult, but it’s likely to be a simpler IPS panel. The Xiaomi’s faster processor also allows for smoother animations and transitions, enhancing the visual experience.
Camera Comparison
Neither tablet is positioned as a photography powerhouse, but the Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro 12.4 likely has an advantage due to its more powerful image signal processor. Without specific camera specs for the Blackview Tab 12, it’s difficult to make a direct comparison. However, the Snapdragon 870’s ISP will enable better noise reduction and dynamic range in photos and videos. The absence of details regarding the Blackview Tab 12’s camera sensors suggests a more basic imaging experience.
Performance
The performance gap between these two tablets is substantial. The Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro 12.4’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (7nm) is a flagship-level chipset, boasting a Kryo 585 CPU configuration with a prime core clocked at 3.2 GHz. This contrasts sharply with the Blackview Tab 12’s Unisoc SC9863A (28nm) and its slower Cortex-A55 cores. The 7nm fabrication process of the Snapdragon 870 offers significantly improved power efficiency and thermal performance compared to the 28nm Unisoc chip, meaning the Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro 12.4 will sustain higher performance for longer periods without throttling. The Xiaomi’s superior GPU will also deliver a much smoother gaming experience.
Battery Life
The battery capacity isn’t specified for either device, but the charging capabilities highlight a major difference. The Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro 12.4’s 67W wired charging, supporting PD3.0 and QC4, is a game-changer, achieving 60% charge in 36 minutes and 100% in 68 minutes. The Blackview Tab 12’s 10W wired charging is significantly slower, implying a much longer recharge time. Even if the Blackview Tab 12 has a larger battery capacity, the Xiaomi’s faster charging will likely result in less downtime overall.
Buying Guide
Buy the Blackview Tab 12 if you need a basic tablet for light tasks like web browsing, video streaming, and reading, and your budget is the primary concern. It's suitable for casual users who don't demand high performance. Buy the Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro 12.4 if you prioritize smooth multitasking, gaming, and a faster overall experience. It’s ideal for professionals, students, or anyone who wants a tablet that can keep up with demanding workloads and offers a significantly quicker recharge time.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Unisoc SC9863A chipset in the Blackview Tab 12 sufficient for multitasking?
The Unisoc SC9863A is designed for basic tablet tasks. While it can handle some multitasking, expect slowdowns and lag when running multiple demanding applications simultaneously. It's best suited for single-app use or light multitasking with less resource-intensive apps.
❓ How much faster is the Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro 12.4's charging compared to the Blackview Tab 12?
The Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro 12.4's 67W charging is dramatically faster. It can reach 100% charge in approximately 68 minutes, while the Blackview Tab 12's 10W charging will take several hours to fully recharge, making it less convenient for users who need quick top-ups.
❓ Will the Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro 12.4 get hot during extended gaming sessions?
The Snapdragon 870 is a relatively efficient chipset, but it can generate heat during prolonged gaming. However, the Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro 12.4 likely incorporates thermal management solutions to mitigate overheating and prevent significant performance throttling. The 7nm process also contributes to better thermal efficiency compared to the Blackview Tab 12’s 28nm chip.
